Hearing aid fitting outcome: Clinical application and psychometric properties of a Swedish translation of the international outcome inventory for hearing aids (IOI-HA)

Journal of the American Academy of Audiology

Volumn 21, Issue 8, 2010, Pages 512-521

  Brännström, K Jonas ^a,b   Wennerström, Ingegerd ^a  

^a LUND UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (Sweden)

^b LUND UNIVERSITY   (Sweden)

Author keywords

Conductive hearing loss; Hearing aids; Mixed hearing loss; Outcome; Satisfaction; Sensorineural hearing loss

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; FEMALE; HEARING AID; HEARING LOSS; HUMAN; INTERNATIONAL OUTCOME INVENTORY FOR HEARING AIDS; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MIXED HEARING LOSS; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PERCEPTION DEAFNESS; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PSYCHOMETRY; PURE TONE AUDIOMETRY; QUESTIONNAIRE; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY;

ADULT; AGE FACTORS; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; AUDITORY THRESHOLD; CROSS-CULTURAL COMPARISON; FEMALE; HEARING AIDS; HEARING LOSS, CONDUCTIVE; HEARING LOSS, SENSORINEURAL; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT (HEALTH CARE); PATIENT SATISFACTION; PROSTHESIS FITTING; PSYCHOMETRICS; QUESTIONNAIRES; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; SEX FACTORS; SWEDEN; TRANSLATING;

EID: 78549266452     PISSN: 10500545     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3766/jaaa.21.8.3     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. Altman DG. (1999) Practical Statistics for Medical Research. London: Chapman and Hall/CRC.
2. Cook JA, Hawkins DB. (2007) Outcome measurement for patients receiving hearing aid services. Laryngoscope 117:610-613.
3. Cox RM, Alexander GC. (2002) The International Outcome Inventory for Hearing Aids (IOI-HA): psychometric properties of the English version. Int J Audiol 41:30-35.
4. Cox RM, Alexander GC, Beyer CM. (2003) Norms for the International Outcome Inventory for Hearing Aids. J Am Acad Audiol 14: 403-413.
5. Cox R, Hyde M, Gatehouse S, et al. (2000) Optimal outcome measures, research priorities, and international cooperation. Ear Hear 21:106S-115S.
6. Cox RM, Stephens D, Kramer SE. (2002) Translations of the International Outcome Inventory for Hearing Aids (IOI-HA). Int J Audiol 41:3-26. (Pubitemid 36553872)
7. Dillon H. (2001) Hearing Aids. Sydney: Boomerang Press.
8. Heuermann H, Kinkel M, Tchorz J. (2005) Comparison of psychometric properties of the International Outcome Inventory for Hearing Aids (IOI-HA) in various studies. Int J Audiol 44: 102-109. (Pubitemid 40676030)
9. Hickson L, Worrall L, Scarinci N. (2006) Measuring outcomes of a communication program for older people with hearing impairment using the International Outcome Inventory. Int J Audiol 45: 238-246.
10. Humes LE, Wilson DL, Barlow NN, Garner C. (2002) Changes in hearing-aid benefit following 1 or 2 years of hearing-aid use by older adults. J Speech Lang Hear Res 45:772-782.
11. International Organization for Standardization (ISO). (1994) Reference equivalent threshold force levels for pure tones and bone vibrators. ISO 389-3. Part 3 of Acoustics: Reference Zero for the Calibration of Audiometric Equipment. Geneva: International Organization for Standardization.
12. International Organization for Standardization (ISO). (2000) Acoustics: Statistical Distribution of Hearing Thresholds as a Function of Age. ISO 7029. Geneva: International Organization for Standardization.
13. Kramer SE, Allessie GH, Dondorp AW, Zekveld AA, Kapteyn TS. (2005) A home education program for older adults with hearing impairment and their significant others: a randomized trial evaluating short- and long-term effects. Int J Audiol 44: 255-264.
14. Kramer SE, Goverts ST, Dreschler WA, Boymans M, Festen JM. (2002) International Outcome Inventory for Hearing Aids (IOI-HA): results from The Netherlands. Int J Audiol 41:36-41. (Pubitemid 36553875)
15. Larson VD, Williams DW, Henderson WG, et al. (2002) A multi-center, double blind clinical trial comparing benefit from three commonly used hearing aid circuits. Ear Hear 23: 269-276.
16. Meister H, Lausberg I, Kiessling J, von Wedel H, Walger M. (2005) Detecting components of hearing aid fitting using a self-assessment-inventory. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 262:580-586. (Pubitemid 41159122)
17. Metselaar M, Maat B, Krijnen P, Verschuure H, Dreschler WA, Feenstra L. (2009) Self-reported disability and handicap after hearing-aid fitting and benefit of hearing aids: comparison of fitting procedures, degree of hearing loss, experience with hearing aids and uni- and bilateral fittings. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 266:907-917.
18. Öberg M, Andersson G, Wänström G, Lunner T. (2008) The effects of a sound awareness pre-fitting intervention: a randomized controlled trial. Audiol Med 6:129-140. (Pubitemid 351883420)
19. Öberg M, Andersson G, Wänström G, Lunner T. (2009) The effects of a pre-fitting intervention on hearing aid benefit: a randomized controlled trial Audiol Med 7:211-225.
20. Öberg M, Lunner T, Andersson G. (2007) Psychometric evaluation of hearing specific self-report measures and their associations with psychosocial and demographic variables. Audiological Med 5:188-199. (Pubitemid 47537382)
21. Öberg M, Wänström G, Hjertman H, Lunner T, Andersson G. (2009) Development and initial validation of the 'Clinical Global Impression' to measure outcomes for audiological rehabilitation. Disabil Rehabil 17:1409-1417.
22. Smeds K, Leijon A. (2000) Hörapparatutprovning. Stockholm: CA Tegnér.
23. Smith SL, Noe CM, Alexander GC. (2009) Evaluation of the International Outcome Inventory for Hearing Aids in a veteran sample. J Am Acad Audiol 20:374-380.
24. Stark P, Hickson L. (2004) Outcomes of hearing aid fitting for older people with hearing impairment and their significant others. Int J Audiol 43:390-398. (Pubitemid 39214907)
25. Stephens D. (2002) The International Outcome Inventory for Hearing Aids (IOI-HA) and its relationship to the Client-Oriented Scale of Improvement (COSI). Int J Audiol 41:42-47.
26. Vestergaard MD. (2006) Self-report outcome in new hearing-aid users: longitudinal trends and relationships between subjective measures of benefit and satisfaction. Int J Audiol 45: 382-392.