Comparison of psychometric of the International Outcome Inventory for Hearing Aids (IOI-HA) in various

International Journal of Audiology

Volumn 44, Issue 2, 2005, Pages 102-109

  Heuermann, Heike ^a,c   Kinkel, Martin ^a   Tchorz, Jürgen ^b  

^a KIND Hörgeräte   (Germany)

^b Phonak AG   (Switzerland)

^c SIEMENS AG   (Germany)

Author keywords

Hearing aid fitting; IOI HA; Outcome measures; Psychometric Properties

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; COMPARATIVE STUDY; CONSUMER; CORRELATION ANALYSIS; FACTORIAL ANALYSIS; FEMALE; GERMANY; HEARING AID; HUMAN; INSTRUMENT; INTERNATIONAL OUTCOME INVENTORY FOR HEARING AIDS; LANGUAGE; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; NETHERLANDS; PATIENT SATISFACTION; POSTAL MAIL; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PSYCHOMETRY; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY; SCORING SYSTEM; UNITED KINGDOM; UNITED STATES; ACOUSTICS; CULTURAL FACTOR; MIDDLE AGED; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PROSTHESIS; PSYCHOLOGICAL ASPECT; QUESTIONNAIRE; REPRODUCIBILITY; STATISTICS;

ACOUSTICS; ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; CROSS-CULTURAL COMPARISON; FEMALE; GERMANY; HEARING AIDS; HUMANS; LANGUAGE; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT (HEALTH CARE); PATIENT SATISFACTION; PROSTHESIS FITTING; PSYCHOMETRICS; QUESTIONNAIRES; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS;

EID: 18744399899     PISSN: 14992027     EISSN: 17088186     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/14992020500031223     Document Type: Article

References (11)

1. Bortz, J. & Döring, N. 1995. Forschungsmethoden und Evaluation. (2nd ed) Berlin, Springer.
2. Cox, R.M. & Alexander, G.C. 2002. The International Outcome Inventory for Hearing Aids (IOI-HA): psychometric properties of the English version. Intern J Audiol, 41, 30-35.
3. Cox, R.M., Hyde, M., Gatehouse, S., Noble, W., Dillon, H., et al. 2000. Optimal Outcome Measures, Research Priorities, and International Cooperation. Ear Hear, 21, 106S-115S.
4. Cox, R.M., Stephens, D. & Kramer, S.E. 2002. Translations of the International Outcome Inventory for Hearing Aids (IOI-HA). Intern J Audiol, 41, 3-26.
5. Fisseni, J. 1990. Lehrbuch der psychologischen Diagnostik. Hogrefe: Göttingen.
6. Holube, I. & Kollmeier, B. 1994. Modifikation eines Fragebogens zur Erfassung des subjektiven Hörvermögens und dessen Beziehung zur Sprachverständlichkeit in Ruhe und unter Störgeräuschen. Audiol Akust, 33, 22-35.
7. Kortekaas, R. & Baumann, J. 2003. Evaluierung der interaktiven Anpassung in der Praxis. Presentation to the 6th annual conference of the German Society of Audiology (DGA), Würzburg, Germany.
8. Kramer, S.E., Goverts, S.T., Dreschler, W.A., et al. 2002. International Outcome Inventory for Hearing Aids (IOI-HA): results from The Netherlands. Intern J Audiol, 41, 36-41.
9. Office of Hearing Services 2002. Client Satisfaction Survey (October 2002). [Internet] Australian Government Department of Health and Ageing. Available from http://www.health.gov.au/hear/press.htm.
10. Stephens, D. 2002. The International Outcome Inventory for Hearing Aids (IOI-HA) and its relationship to the Client-oriented Scale of Improvement (COSI). Intern J Audiol, 41, 42-47.
11. Walden, T.C. & Walden, B.E. 2003. Predicting Hearing Aid Usefulness. San Antonio, TX: Presentation to the Annual Convention of the American Academy of Audiology.