Towards an adaptive POD/SVD surrogate model for aeronautic design

Computers and Fluids

Volumn 40, Issue 1, 2011, Pages 195-209

  Braconnier, T ^a   Ferrier, M ^a   Jouhaud, J C ^a   Montagnac, M ^a   Sagaut, P ^b  

^a CERFACS   (France)

^b INSTITUT JEAN LE ROND D ALEMBERT   (France)

Author keywords

Aerodynamic design; Error estimation; Model reduction; Proper Orthogonal Decomposition; Sampling; Singular Value Decomposition

Indexed keywords

AERODYNAMIC DESIGNS; ERROR ESTIMATION; MODEL REDUCTION; PROPER ORTHOGONAL DECOMPOSITIONS; SINGULAR VALUES;

AERODYNAMICS; COMBINATORIAL OPTIMIZATION; COMPUTER SIMULATION; DESIGN; ESTIMATION; FLIGHT SIMULATORS; FUEL ADDITIVES; NAVIER STOKES EQUATIONS; TRANSONIC FLOW;

SINGULAR VALUE DECOMPOSITION;

EID: 78549251697     PISSN: 00457930     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.compfluid.2010.09.002     Document Type: Article

References (42)

1. Lumley J.L. Stochastic tools in turbulence 1971, Academic Press, New-York.
2. Berkooz G., Holmes P., Lumley J.L. The proper orthogonal decomposition in the analysis of turbulent flows. Annu Rev Fluid Mech 1993, 25:539-575.
3. Couplet M., Basdevant C., Sagaut P. Calibrated reduced-order POD-Galerkin system for fluid flow modelling. J Comput Phys 2005, 207(1):192-220.
4. Couplet M., Sagaut P., Basdevant C. Intermodal energy transfers in a proper orthogonal decomposition-Galerkin representation of a turbulent separated flow. J Fluid Mech 2003, 491:275-284.
5. Ito K., Ravindran S.S. A reduced-order method for simulation and control of fluid flows. J Comput Phys 1998, 143(2):403-425.
6. Cusumano J.P., Sharkady M.T., Kimble B.W. Experimental measurement of dimensionality and spatial coherence in the dynamics of a flexible-beam impact oscillator. Philos Trans Roy Soc Lond 1994, 347:421-438.
7. Feeny B.F., Kappagantu R. On the physical interpretation of proper orthogonal modes in vibrations. J Sound Vib 1998, 211:607-616.
8. Saranli U, Buehler M, Koditschek D. Design, modeling and preliminary control of a compliant hexapod robot. In: Proceeding of IEEE ICRA, San Francisco, CA; 2000.
9. Kosambi D.D. Statistics in function space. J Ind Math Soc 1943, 7:76-88.
10. Everson R., Sirovich L. The Karhunen-Loeve procedure for gappy data. J Opt Soc Am 1995, 12:1657-1664.
11. My-Ha D., Lim K.M., Khoo B.C., Willcox K. Real-time optimization using proper orthogonal decomposition: free surface shape prediction due to underwater bubble dynamics. Comput Fluids 2007, 36(3):499-512.
12. Bui-Thanh T., Damodaran M., Willcox K. Aerodynamic data reconstruction and inverse design using proper orthogonal decomposition. AIAA J 2004, 42(8):1505-1516.
13. Lieu T., Farhat C. Adaptation of aeroelastic reduced-order models and application to an F-16 configuration. AIAA J 2007, 45(6):1244-1257.
14. Amsallem D., Farhat C. Interpolation method for adapting reduced-order models and application to aeroelasticity. AIAA J 2008, 46(7):1803-1813.
15. Bui-Thanh T., Willcox K., Ghattas O. Model reduction for large-scale systems with high-dimensional parametric input space. SIAM J Sci Comput 2008, 30(6):3270-3288.
16. Wilcox D.C. Simulation of transition with a two-equation turbulence model. AIAA J 1994, 32(2):247-255.
17. Cambier L, Veuillot, J-P. Status of the elsA CFD Software for flow simulation and multi-disciplinary applications. In: 46th Aerospace sciences meeting and exhibit, AIAA, Paper 2008-664; 2008.
18. Jameson A. Steady state solutions of the euler equations for transonic flow by a multigrid method. Advances in scintific comp. 1982, Academic Press, pp. 37-70.
19. Jameson A, Schmidt W, Turkel E. Numerical solutions of the euler equations by finite volume methods using Runge-Kutta time-stepping schemes. AIAA Paper 81-1259; 1981.
20. Yoon S, Jameson A. An LU-SSOR Scheme for the Euler and Navier-Stokes equations. AIAA Paper 87-0600; 1987.
21. Jouhaud J.C., Sagaut P., Labeyrie B. A Kriging approach for CFD/wind tunnel data comparison. ASME J Fluids Eng 2006, 128:847-855.
22. Jouhaud J.C., Sagaut P., Montagnac M., Laurenceau J. A surrogate-model based multi-disciplinary shape optimization method with application to a 2D subsonic airfoil. Comput Fluids 2007, 36(3):520-529.
23. Sirovich L. Turbulence and the dynamics of coherent structures. Part 1: coherent structures. Q Appl Math 1987, 45(3):561-571.
24. Golub G.H., Van Loan C.F. Matrix computations 1996, The Johns Hopkins University Press.
25. Rencher AC. Linear models in statistics. Wiley series in probability and statistics; 2000.
26. Ahlberg H., Nielson E., Walsh J. The theory of splines and their applications 1967, Academic Press.
27. Dreyfus G. Neural networks: methodology and applications 2005, Springer-Verlag.
28. Jordan M.I., Jacobs R.A. Hierarchical mixtures of experts and the EM algorithm. Neural Comput 1994, 6:181-214.
29. Krige D.G. A statistical approach to some basic mine valuations problems on the witwatersrand. J Chem Metal Min Soc S Afr 1951, 52:119-139.
30. Sacks J., Welch W.J., Mitchell T.J., Wynn H.P. Design and analysis of computer experiments. Statistical Science 1989, 4(4):409-435.
31. Laurenceau J., Sagaut P. Building efficient response surfaces of aerodynamic functions with Kriging and cokriging. AIAA J 2008, 46(2):498-507.
32. Geisser S. Predictive inference: an introduction 1993, Chapman and Hall.
33. Brand M. Fast low-rank modifications of the thin singular value decomposition. Linear Algebra Appl 2006, 415(1):20-30.
34. Finkel R., Bentley J.L. Quad trees: a data structure for retrieval on composite keys. Acta Inform 1974, 4(1):1-9.
35. Melenchon J., Iriondo I., Meler L. Simultaneous and causal appearance learning and tracking. Electron Lett Comput Vis Image Anal 2005, 5(3):44-54.
36. Cook PH, McDonald MA, Firmin MCP. Aerofoil RAE 2822-pressure distributions and boundary layer and wake measurements. AGARD AR 138; 1977.
37. Michalewicz Z. Genetic algorithms+data structures=evolution programs 1992, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Heidelberg, New-York.
38. Gentle J.E. Random number generation and Monte Carlo methods. Statistics and computing 2003, Springer-Verlag.
39. Sobol I.M., Turchaninov V.I., Levitan Yu L., Shukhman B.V. Quasi-random sequence generators. Keldysh institute of applied mathematics 1992, Russian Academy of Sciences, Moscow.
40. McKay M.D., Beckman R.J., Conover W.J. A comparison of three methods for selecting values of input variables in the analysis of output from a computer code. Technometrics 2000, 42(1):55-61.
41. Scheffer T., Wrobel S. Finding the most interesting patterns in a database quickly by using sequential sampling. J Mach Learn Res 2003, 3(1):833-862.
42. Patera AT, Rozza G. Reduced basis approximation and a posteriori error estimation for parametrized partial differential equations. Version 1.0, Copyright MIT 2006-2007, to appear in (tentative rubric) MIT Pappalardo Graduate Monographs in Mechanical Engineering.