A surrogate-model based multidisciplinary shape optimization method with application to a 2D subsonic airfoil

Computers and Fluids

Volumn 36, Issue 3, 2007, Pages 520-529

  Jouhaud, J C ^a   Sagaut, P ^b   Montagnac, M ^a   Laurenceau, J ^a  

^a CERFACS   (France)

^b SORBONNE UNIVERSITÉ   (France)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

AERODYNAMICS; COMPUTER SIMULATION; FORCE CONTROL; INTERPOLATION; OPTIMIZATION;

AERODYNAMIC FORCES; AERODYNAMIC FORCES CONTROL; DYNAMIC KRIGING METHOD; MULTIDISCIPLINARY SHAPE OPTIMIZATION; SUBSONIC AIRFOIL;

AIRFOILS;

AERODYNAMICS; AIRFOILS; COMPUTER SIMULATION; FORCE CONTROL; INTERPOLATION; OPTIMIZATION;

EID: 33845274502     PISSN: 00457930     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.compfluid.2006.04.001     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. Marsden A.L., Wang M., Dennis J.E., and Moin P. Optimal aeroacoustic shape design using the surrogate management framework. Optim Eng 5 2 (2004) 235-262 Special Issue on Surrogate Optimization
2. Marsden AL, Wang M, Koumoutsakos P. Optimal aeroacoustic shape design using approximation modeling. Annual Research Briefs, Center for Turbulence Research, 2002, p. 201-13.
3. El-Beltagy M.A., and Keane A.J. Evolutionary optimization for computationally expensive problems using Gaussian processes. In: Arabnia H. (Ed). Proc. int. conf. artificial intelligence IC-Al'2001 (2001), CSREA Press, Las Vegas 708-714
4. Booker A.J., Dennis Jr. J.E., Frank P.D., Serafini D.B., Torczon V., and Trosset M.W. A rigourous framework for optimization of expensive functions by surrogates. Struct Optim 17 1 (1999) 1-13
5. Buche D., Schraudolph N.N., and Koumoutsakos P. Accelerating evolutionary algorithms with Gaussian process fitness function models. IEEE Trans Systems, Man Cybern. Part C 35 2 (2005) 183-194
6. Simpson TW, Mauery TM, Korte JJ, Mistree F. Comparaison of response surface and Kriging models for multidisciplinary design optimization. In: 7th AIAA/USAF/NASA/ISSMO symposium on multidisciplinary analysis and optimization, St. Louis, USA, AIAA Paper 98-4758, 1998.
7. Torczon V, Trosset MW. Using approximations to accelerate engineering design optimization, ICASE Report No. 98-33, Tech. Rep., NASA Langley Research Center Hampton, VA 23681-2199, 1998.
8. Jin Y., Olhofer M., and Sendhoff B. A framework for evolutionary optimization with approximate fitness functions. IEEE Trans Evol Comput 6 5 (2002) 481-494
9. Jin Y. A comprehensive survey of fitness approximation in evolutionary computation. Soft Comput 9 1 (2005) 3-12
10. Cambier L, Gazaix M. elsA: an efficient object-oriented solution to CFD complexity. In: 40th AIAA aerospace science meeting and exhibit, Reno, AIAA Paper 2002-0108, 2002.
11. Wilcox D.C. Simulation of transition with a two-equation turbulence model. AIAA J 32 2 (1994) 247-255
12. Jameson A, Schmidt W, Turkel E. Numerical solutions of the Euler equations by finite volume methods using Runge-Kutta time-stepping schemes, AIAA Paper 81-1259, 1981.
13. Jameson A. Steady state solutions of the Euler equations for transonic flow by a multigrid method. Advances in scientific comp (1982), Academic Press 37-70
14. Yoon S, Jameson A. An LU-SSOR scheme for the Euler and Navier-Stokes equations, AIAA Paper 87-0600, 1987.
15. Krige D.G. A statistical approach to some basic mine valuations problems on the witwatersrand. J Chem, Metal Mining Soc South Africa 52 (1951) 119-139
16. Oliver M.A., and Webster R. Kriging: a method of interpolation for geographical information system. Int J Geograph Informat Systems 4 3 (1990) 313-332
17. Journel A.G., and Huijbregts C.J. Mining geostatistics (1978), Academic Press
18. Christakos G., and Hristopulos D.T. Spatiotemporal environmental health modeling (1988), Kluwer
19. Anderson E., Bai Z., Bischof C., Blackford S., Demmel J., Dongarra J., et al. LAPACK users' guide. 3rd ed. (1999), Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics
20. Hosder S, Schetz JA, Grossman B, Mason WH. Airframe noise modeling appropriate for multidisciplinary design and optimization. In: 42nd AIAA aerospace science meeting and exhibit, Reno, Nevada, January 5-8, 2004.
21. Quirk JJ. An adaptive grid algorithm for computational shock hydrodynamics. Ph.D. Thesis, Cranfield Institute of Technology, College of Aeronautics, 1991.
22. Jouhaud J.-C., Montagnac M., and Tourrette L. A multigrid adaptive mesh refinement strategy for 3D aerodynamics design. Int J Numer Meth Fluids 47 (2005) 367-385
23. Sacks J., Welch W.J., Mitchell T.J., and Wynn H.P. Design and analysis of computer experiments. Statist Sci 4 (1989) 409-435