Observational constraints on cosmological models with the updated long gamma-ray bursts

Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics

Volumn 2010, Issue 8, 2010, Pages

  Wei, Hao ^a  

^a BEIJING INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (China)

Author keywords

Dark energy experiments; Dark energy theory; Gamma ray burst experiments; Supernova type ia Standard candles

Indexed keywords

EID: 78449305776     PISSN: 14757516     EISSN: 14757516     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1088/1475-7516/2010/08/020     Document Type: Article

References (101)

1. E.J. Copeland, M. Sami and S. Tsujikawa, Dynamics of dark energy, Int. J. Mod. Phys. D 15 (2006) 1753 [hep-th/0603057] [SPIRES];
2. J. Frieman, M. Turner and D. Huterer, Dark energy and the accelerating universe, Ann. Rev. Astron. Astrophys. 46 (2008) 385 [arXiv:0803.0982] [SPIRES];
3. S. Tsujikawa, Dark energy: investigation and modeling, arXiv: 1004.1493 [SPIRES].
4. B.E. Schaefer, The Hubble diagram to redshift > 6 from 69 gamma-ray bursts, Astrophys. J. 660 (2007) 16 [astro-ph/0612285] [SPIRES].
5. V. Bromm and A. Loeb, The expected redshift distribution of gamma-ray bursts, Astrophys. J. 575 (2002) 111 [astro-ph/0201400] [SPIRES];
6. J.-R. Lin, S.N. Zhang and T.P. Li, Dominant gamma-ray bursts production in the early universe, Astrophys. J. 605 (2004) 819 [astro-ph/0311363] [SPIRES].
7. G. Ghirlanda, G. Ghisellini and C. Firmani, Gamma ray bursts as standard candles to constrain the cosmological parameters, New J. Phys. 8 (2006) 123 [astro-ph/0610248] [SPIRES].
8. B. Zhang, Gamma-ray bursts in the swift era, Chin. J. Astron. Astrophys. 7 (2007) 1 [astro-ph/0701520] [SPIRES];
9. B. Zhang, Gamma-ray burst afteglows, Adv. Space Res. 40 (2007) 1186
10. [Erratum ibid. 41 (2008) 998] [astro-ph/0611774] [SPIRES].
11. P. Meszaros, Gamma-ray bursts, Rept. Prog. Phys. 69 (2006) 2259 [astro-ph/0605208] [SPIRES];
12. V. Bromm and A. Loeb, GRB cosmology, arXiv:0706.2445 [SPIRES];
13. S.E. Woosley and J.S. Bloom, The supernova -gamma-ray burst connection, Ann. Rev. Astron. Astrophys. 44 (2006) 507 [astro-ph/0609142] [SPIRES].
14. G. Ghirlanda, G. Ghisellini and C. Firmani, Gamma ray bursts as standard candles to constrain the cosmological parameters, New J. Phys. 8 (2006) 123 [astro-ph/0610248] [SPIRES].
15. G. Ghirlanda, G. Ghisellini, D. Lazzati and C. Firmani, Gamma ray bursts: new rulers to measure the universe, Astrophys. J. 613 (2004) L13 [astro-ph/0408350] [SPIRES].
16. C. Firmani, G. Ghisellini, G. Ghirlanda and V. Avila-Reese, A new method optimized to use gamma ray bursts as cosmic rulers, Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc. 360 (2005) L1 [astro-ph/0501395] [SPIRES].
17. H. Li et al., Overcoming the circulation problem for γ-ray bursts in cosmological global fitting analysis, Astrophys. J. 680 (2008) 92 [arXiv:0711.1792] [SPIRES].
18. E.-W. Liang and B. Zhang, Calibration of gamma-ray burst luminosity indicators, Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc. Lett. 369 (2006) L37 [astro-ph/0512177] [SPIRES].
19. N. Liang, W.K. Xiao, Y. Liu and S.N. Zhang, A cosmology independent calibration of gamma-ray burst luminosity relations and the Hubble diagram, Astrophys. J. 685 (2008) 354 [arXiv:0802.4262] [SPIRES].
20. Y. Kodama et al., Gamma-ray bursts in 1.8 < z < 5.6 suggest that the time variation of the dark energy is small, Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc. 391 (2008) L1 [arXiv:0802.3428] [SPIRES].
21. N. Liang and S.N. Zhang, Cosmology-independent distance moduli of 42 gamma-ray bursts between redshift of 1.44 and 6.60, AIP Conf. Proc. 1065 (2008) 367 [arXiv:0808.2655] [SPIRES];
22. T.-S. Wang and N. Liang, Constraints on Cardassian universe from gamma ray bursts, arXiv:0910.5835 [SPIRES];
23. N. Liang, P. Wu and S.N. Zhang, Constraints on cosmological models and reconstructing the acceleration history of the universe with gamma-ray burst distance indicators, Phys. Rev. D 81 (2010) 083518 [arXiv:0911.5644] [SPIRES];
24. H. Gao, N. Liang and Z.-H. Zhu, Calibration of GRB luminosity relations with cosmography, arXiv: 1003.5755 [SPIRES].
25. H. Wei and S.N. Zhang, Reconstructing the cosmic expansion history up to redshift z = 6.29 with the calibrated gamma-ray bursts, Eur. Phys. J. C 63 (2009) 139 [arXiv:0808.2240] [SPIRES].
26. iso correlation of gamma-ray bursts, Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc. 391 (2008) 577 [arXiv:0805.0377] [SPIRES].
27. iso correlation and Fermi gamma-ray bursts, arXiv: 1002.2232 [SPIRES].
28. L. Amati, F. Frontera and C. Guidorzi, Spectrum-energy correlations in gamma-ray bursts confront extremely energetic Fermi GRBs, Astron. Astrophys. 508 (2009) 173 [arXiv:0907.0384] [SPIRES].
29. We are grateful to L. Amati for providing us the numerical data of 14 unpublished GRBs in private communication and kindly allowing us to use them in our relevant papers. Note that there is an additional GRB 091024 beyond the 13 GRBs mentiond in [17].
30. R. Amanullah et al., Spectra and light curves of six type Ia supernovae at 0.511 < z < 1.12 and the Union2 compilation, Astrophys. J. 716 (2010) 712 [arXiv: 1004.1711] [SPIRES]. The numerical data of the full Union2 sample are available at http://supernova.lbl.gov/Union.
31. E. Komatsu et al., Seven-year Wilkinson Microwave Anisotropy Probe (WMAP) observations: cosmological interpretation, arXiv: 1001.4538 [SPIRES].
32. SDSS collaboration, M. Tegmark et al., Cosmological parameters from SDSS and WMAP, Phys. Rev. D 69 (2004) 103501 [astro-ph/0310723] [SPIRES];
33. The 3D power spectrum of galaxies from the SDSS, Astrophys. J. 606 (2004) 702 [astro-ph/0310725] [SPIRES];
34. SDSS collaboration, U. Seljak et al., Cosmological parameter analysis including SDSS Ly-α forest and galaxy bias: constraints on the primordial spectrum of fluctuations, neutrino mass and dark energy, Phys. Rev. D 71 (2005) 103515 [astro-ph/0407372] [SPIRES];
35. SDSS collaboration, M. Tegmark et al., Cosmological constraints from the SDSS luminous red galaxies, Phys. Rev. D 74 (2006) 123507 [astro-ph/0608632] [SPIRES].
36. SDSS collaboration, D.J. Eisenstein et al., Detection of the baryon acoustic peak in the large-scale correlation function of SDSS luminous red galaxies, Astrophys. J. 633 (2005) 560 [astro-ph/0501171] [SPIRES].
37. L. Amati et al., Intrinsic spectra and energetics of BeppoSAX gamma-ray bursts with known redshifts, Astron. Astrophys. 390 (2002) 81 [astro-ph/0205230] [SPIRES].
38. iso correlation in GRBs: updated, observational status, re-analysis and main implications, Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc. 372 (2006) 233 [astro-ph/0601553] [SPIRES].
39. iso correlation for GRB, Astrophys. J. 614 (2004) L13 [astro-ph/0405014] [SPIRES];
40. A. Levinson and D. Eichler, The difference between the Amati and Ghirlanda relations, Astrophys. J. 629 (2005) L13 [astro-ph/0504125] [SPIRES].
41. R. Yamazaki, K. Ioka and T. Nakamura, Peak energy-isotropic energy relation in the off-axis gamma-ray burst model, Astrophys. J. 606 (2004) L33 [astro-ph/0401044] [SPIRES];
42. iso correlation in a multiple subjet model of gamma-ray bursts, Astrophys. J. 635 (2005) 481 [astro-ph/0504624] [SPIRES].
43. M.J. Rees and P. Meszaros, Dissipative photosphere models of gamma-ray bursts and X-ray flashes, Astrophys. J. 628 (2005) 847 [astro-ph/0412702] [SPIRES].
44. T. Isobe, E.D. Feigelson, M.G. Akritas and G.J. Babu, Linear regression in astronomy, Astrophys. J. 364 (1990) 104 [SPIRES].
45. S. Nesseris and L. Perivolaropoulos, Comparison of the legacy and gold SnIa dataset constraints on dark energy models, Phys. Rev. D 72 (2005) 123519 [astro-ph/0511040] [SPIRES];
46. L. Perivolaropoulos, Constraints on linear-negative potentials in quintessence and phantom models from recent supernova data, Phys. Rev. D 71 (2005) 063503 [astro-ph/0412308] [SPIRES].
47. E. Di Pietro and J.-F. Claeskens, Quintessence models faced with future Supernovae data, Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc. 341 (2003) 1299 [astro-ph/0207332] [SPIRES].
48. Y. Wang and P. Mukherjee, Robust dark energy constraints from supernovae, galaxy clustering and three-year Wilkinson Microwave Anisotropy Probe observations, Astrophys. J. 650 (2006) 1 [astrc-ph/0604051] [SPIRES].
49. J.R. Bond, G. Efstathiou and M. Tegmark, Forecasting cosmic parameter errors from microwave background anisotropy experiments, Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc. 291 (1997) L33 [astro-ph/9702100] [SPIRES].
50. S. Nesseris and L. Perivolaropoulos, A comparison of cosmological models using recent supernova data, Phys. Rev. D 70 (2004) 043531 [astro-ph/0401556] [SPIRES].
51. M. Chevallier and D. Polarski, Accelerating universes with scaling dark matter, Int. J. Mod. Phys. D 10 (2001) 213 [gr-qc/0009008] [SPIRES];
52. E.V. Linder, Exploring the expansion history of the universe, Phys. Rev. Lett. 90 (2003) 091301 [astro-ph/0208512] [SPIRES].
53. R. Lazkoz, S. Nesseris and L. Perivolaropoulos, Exploring cosmological expansion parametrizations with the gold SnIa dataset, JCAP 11 (2005) 010 [astro-ph/0503230] [SPIRES].
54. H. Wei, N.-N. Tang and S.N. Zhang, Reconstruction of hessence dark energy and the latest type-Ia supernovae gold dataset, Phys. Rev. D 75 (2007) 043009 [astro-ph/0612746] [SPIRES].
55. G.R. Dvali, G. Gabadadze and M. Porrati, 4D gravity on a brane in 5D Minkowski space, Phys. Lett. B 485 (2000) 208 [hep-th/0005016] [SPIRES].
56. C. Deffayet, Cosmology on a brane in Minkowski bulk, Phys. Lett. B 502 (2001) 199 [hep-th/0010186] [SPIRES];
57. C. Deffayet, G.R. Dvali and G. Gabadadze, Accelerated universe from gravity leaking to extra dimensions, Phys. Rev. D 65 (2002) 044023 [astro-ph/0105068] [SPIRES].
58. A. Lue, The phenomenology of Dvali-Gabadadze-Porrati cosmologies, Phys. Rept. 423 (2006) 1 [astro-ph/0510068] [SPIRES].
59. H. Wei, Growth index of DGP model and current growth rate data, Phys. Lett. B 664 (2008) 1 [arXiv:0802.4122] [SPIRES].
60. H. Wei and R.-G. Cai, Cosmological constraints on new agegraphic dark energy, Phys. Lett. B 663 (2008) 1 [arXiv:0708.1894] [SPIRES].
61. H. Wei and R.-G. Cai, A new model of agegraphic dark energy, Phys. Lett. B 660 (2008) 113 [arXiv:0708.0884] [SPIRES].
62. G. 't Hooft, Dimensional reduction in quantum gravity, gr-qc/9310026 [SPIRES];
63. L. Susskind, The world as a hologram, J. Math. Phys. 36 (1995) 6377 [hep-th/9409089] [SPIRES].
64. R. Bousso, The holographic principle, Rev. Mod. Phys. 74 (2002) 825 [hep-th/0203101] [SPIRES].
65. J.D. Bekenstein, Black holes and entropy, Phys. Rev. D 7 (1973) 2333 [SPIRES];
66. Generalized second law of thermodynamics in black hole physics, Phys. Rev. D 9 (1974) 3292 [SPIRES];
67. A universal upper bound on the entropy to energy ratio for bounded systems, Phys. Rev. D 23 (1981) 287 [SPIRES];
68. Entropy bounds and black hole remnants, Phys. Rev. D 49 (1994) 1912 [gr-qc/9307035] [SPIRES].
69. S.W. Hawking, Particle creation by black holes, Commun. Math. Phys. 43 (1975) 199
70. [Erratum ibid. 46 (1976) 206] [SPIRES];
71. Black holes and thermodynamics, Phys. Rev. D 13 (1976) 191 [SPIRES].
72. A.G. Cohen, D.B. Kaplan and A.E. Nelson, Effective field theory, black holes and the cosmological constant, Phys. Rev. Lett. 82 (1999) 4971 [hep-th/9803132] [SPIRES].
73. M. Li, A model of holographic dark energy, Phys. Lett. B 603 (2004) 1 [hep-th/0403127] [SPIRES].
74. X. Zhang and F.-Q. Wu, Constraints on holographic dark energy from latest supernovae, galaxy clustering and cosmic microwave background anisotropy observations, Phys. Rev. D 76 (2007) 023502 [astro-ph/0701405] [SPIRES].
75. H. Wei and S.N. Zhang, Age problem in the holographic dark energy model, Phys. Rev. D 76 (2007) 063003 [arXiv:0707.2129] [SPIRES].
76. M. Li, X.-D. Li and X. Zhang, Comparison of dark energy models: a perspective from the latest observational data, arXiv:0912.3988v1 [SPIRES].
77. M. Li, X.-D. Li, S. Wang and X. Zhang, Holographic dark energy models: a comparison from the latest observational data, JCAP 06 (2009) 036 [arXiv:0904.0928] [SPIRES].
78. C. Gao, X. Chen and Y.-G. Shen, A holographic dark energy model from Ricci scalar curvature, Phys. Rev. D 79 (2009) 043511 [arXiv:0712.1394] [SPIRES].
79. R.-G. Cai, B. Hu and Y. Zhang, Holography, UV/IR relation, causal entropy bound and dark energy, Commun. Theor. Phys. 51 (2009) 954 [arXiv:0812.4504] [SPIRES].
80. A.R. Liddle, Information criteria for astrophysical model selection, Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc. Lett. 377 (2007) L74 [astro-ph/0701113] [SPIRES];
81. Statistical methods for cosmological parameter selection and estimation, Ann. Rev. Nucl. Part. Sci. 59 (2009) 95 [arXiv:0903.4210] [SPIRES].
82. G. Schwarz, Estimating the dimension of a model, Ann. Statist. 6 (1978) 461.
83. H. Akaike, A new look at the statistical model identification, IEEE Trans. Automatic Control 19 (1974) 716.
84. W. Godlowski and M. Szydlowski, Which cosmological model with dark energy - phantom or ACDM, Phys. Lett. B 623 (2005) 10 [astro-ph/0507322] [SPIRES];
85. Which cosmological models - with dark energy or modified FRW dynamics?, Phys. Lett. B 633 (2006) 427 [astro-ph/0509415] [SPIRES];
86. M. Szydlowski, A. Kurek and A. Krawiec, Top ten accelerating cosmological models, Phys. Lett. B 642 (2006) 171 [astro-ph/0604327] [SPIRES];
87. 6 corrections, Phys. Rev. D 77 (2008) 043530 [arXiv:0706.0283] [SPIRES];
88. M. Szydlowski and A. Kurek, AIC, BIC, Bayesian evidence and a notion on simplicity of cosmological model, arXiv:0801.0638 [SPIRES].
89. bolo are explicitly given in [17] (and [16, 18, 19]) which are more convenient for our computing, we choose to use these 109 long GRBs instead. One can easily extend our work with a larger GRBs sample.
90. N.R. Butler, D. Kocevski, J.S. Bloom and J.L. Curtis, A complete catalog of swift GRB spectra and durations: demise of a physical origin for pre-swift high-energy correlations, Astrophys. J. 671 (2007) 656 [arXiv:0706.1275] [SPIRES];
91. N.R. Butler, J.S. Bloom and D. Poznanski, The cosmic rate, luminosity function and intrinsic correlations of long GRBs, Astrophys. J. 711 (2010) 495 [arXiv: 0910.3341] [SPIRES].
92. N.M. Lloyd, V. Petrosian and R.S. Mallozzi, Cosmological versus intrinsic: the correlation between intensity and the peak of the vF(v) spectrum of gamma ray bursts, Astrophys. J. 534 (2000) 227 [astro-ph/990819l] [SPIRES].
93. We thank the the anonymous referee for pointing out this issue.
94. E. Nakar and T. Piran, Outliers to the isotropic energy-peak energy relation in GRBs, Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc. 360 (2005) 73 [astro-ph/0412232] [SPIRES];
95. D.L. Band and R.D. Preece, Testing the gamma-ray burst energy relationships, Astrophys. J. 627 (2005) 319 [astro-ph/0501559] [SPIRES];
96. A.S. Friedman and J.S. Bloom, Towards a more standardized candle using GRB energetics and spectra, Astrophys. J. 627 (2005) 1 [astro-ph/0408413] [SPIRES];
97. N.R. Butler, D. Kocevski and J.S. Bloom, Tests for selection effects in GRB high-energy correlations, Astrophys. J. 694 (2009) 76 [arXiv:0802.3396] [SPIRES];
98. A. Shahmoradi and R.J. Nemiroff, The possible impact of GRB detector thresholds on cosmological standard candles, arXiv:0904.1464 [SPIRES].
99. S. Basilakos and L. Perivolaropoulos, Testing GRBs as standard candles, Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc. 391 (2008) 411 [arXiv:0805.0875] [SPIRES].
100. H. Wei, Revisiting the cosmological constraints on the interacting dark energy models, Phys. Lett. B 691 (2010) 173 [arXiv: 1004.0492] [SPIRES];
101. Cosmological constraints on the modified entropie force model, Phys. Lett. B in press [arXiv: 1005.1445] [SPIRES].