Against the existence of pied-piping: Evidence from tlingit

Linguistic Inquiry

Volumn 41, Issue 4, 2010, Pages 563-594

  Cable, Seth ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MASSACHUSETTS   (United States)

Author keywords

Constraints on pied piping; Pied piping; Q particle; Tlingit

Indexed keywords

EID: 78449279207     PISSN: 00243892     EISSN: 00243892     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1162/LING_a_00013     Document Type: Article

References (41)

1. Boeckx, Cedric. 2009. On the locus of asymmetry in UG. Catalan Journal of Linguistics 8:41-53.
2. Bošković, Željko. 2005. On the locality of Move and Agree. University of Connecticut Occasional Papers in Linguistics 3. Cambridge, MA: MIT, MIT Working Papers in Linguistics.
3. Cable, Seth. 2007. The grammar of Q: Q-particles and the nature of wh-fronting, as revealed by the whquestions of Tlingit. Doctoral dissertation, MIT, Cambridge, MA.
4. Cable, Seth. 2008. Question particles and the nature of wh-fronting. In Quantification: A cross-linguistic perspective, ed. by Lisa Matthewson, 105-178. Bingley, UK: Emerald.
5. Cable, Seth. 2010. The grammar of Q: Q-particles, wh-movement, and pied-piping. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
6. Chomsky, Noam. 1995. The Minimalist Program. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
7. Chomsky, Noam. 2000. Minimalist inquiries: The framework. In Step by step: Essays on minimalism in honor of Howard Lasnik, ed. by Roger Martin, David Michaels, and Juan Uriagereka, 89-155. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
8. Coon, Jessica. 2009. Interrogative possessors and the problem with pied-piping in Chol. Linguistic Inquiry 40:165-175.
9. Cowper, Elizabeth. 1987. Pied-piping, feature percolation and the structure of the noun phrase. Canadian Journal of Linguistics 32:321-338.
10. Culicover, Peter. 1999. Syntactic nuts. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
11. Dauenhauer, Nora Marks, and Richard Dauenhauer. 1987. Classics of Tlingit oral literature. Vol. 1, Haa shuká, Our ancestors: Tlingit oral narratives. Juneau, AK: Sealaska Heritage Institute.
12. Dauenhauer, Nora Marks, and Richard Dauenhauer. 1990. Classics of Tlingit oral literature. Vol. 2, Haa tuwunáagu yís, For healing our spirit: Tlingit oratory. Juneau, AK: Sealaska Heritage Institute.
13. Dauenhauer, Nora Marks, and Richard Dauenhauer. 2000. Beginning Tlingit. Juneau, AK: Sealaska Heritage Institute.
14. Embick, David, and Alec Marantz. 2008. Architecture and blocking. Linguistic Inquiry 39:1-53.
15. Ginzburg, Jonathan, and Ivan Sag. 2000. Interrogative investigations: The form, meaning, and use of English interrogatives. Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications.
16. Grimshaw, Jane. 2000. Locality and extended projections. In Lexical specification and insertion, ed. by Peter Coopmans, Martin Everaert, and Jane Grimshaw, 115-134. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
17. Hagstrom, Paul. 1998. Decomposing questions. Doctoral dissertation, MIT, Cambridge, MA.
18. Heck, Fabian. 2008. On pied-piping: Wh-movement and beyond. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
19. Heck, Fabian. 2009. On certain properties of pied-piping. Linguistic Inquiry 40:75-111.
20. Horvath, Julia. 2000. Interfaces vs. the computational system in the syntax of focus. In Interface strategies, ed. by Hans Bennis, Martin Everaert, and Eric Reuland, 183-207. Amsterdam: Royal Netherlands Academy of Arts and Sciences.
21. Horvath, Julia. 2007a. Pied-piping. In The Blackwell syntax companion, ed. by Martin Everaert and Henk van Riemsdijk, 569-630. Oxford: Blackwell.
22. Horvath, Julia. 2007b. Separating 'focus movement' from focus. In Phrasal and clausal architecture: Syntactic derivation and interpretation; In honor of Joseph E. Emonds, ed. by Simin Karimi, Vida Samiian, and Wendy K. Wilkins, 108-145. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
23. Kayne, Richard. 1994. The antisymmetry of syntax. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
24. Kishimoto, Hideki. 2005. Wh-in-situ and movement in Sinhala questions. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 23:1-51.
25. Ko, Heejeong. 2005. Syntax of why-in-situ: Merge in [Spec, CP] in the overt syntax. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 23:867-916.
26. Koopman, Hilda J. 2000. Prepositions, postpositions, circumpositions and particles: The structure of Dutch PPs. In The syntax of specifiers and heads: Collected essays of Hilda J. Koopman, 204-260. London: Routledge.
27. Koopman, Hilda J., and Anna Szabolcsi. 2000. Verbal complexes. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
28. Kratzer, Angelika, and Junko Shimoyama. 2002. Indeterminate pronouns: The view from Japanese. In Proceedings of the 3rd Tokyo Conference on Psycholinguistics, ed. by Yukio Otsu, 1-25. Tokyo: Hituzi Syobo.
29. Lasnik, Howard, and Mamoru Saito. 1992. Move e: Conditions on its application and output. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
30. Leer, Jeff. 1991. The schetic categories of the Tlingit verb. Doctoral dissertation, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL.
31. Nyman, Elizabeth, and Jeff Leer. 1993. Gágiwdul.àt: Brought forth to reconfirm. The legacy of a Taku River Tlingit clan. Fairbanks, AK: Alaska Native Language Center.
32. Pesetsky, David, and Esther Torrego. 2007. The syntax of valuation and the interpretability of features. In Phrasal and clausal architecture: Syntactic derivation and interpretation; In honor of Joseph E. Emonds, ed. by Simin Karimi, Vida Samiian, and Wendy K. Wilkins, 262-294. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
33. Ross, John Robert. 1967. Constraints on variables in syntax. Doctoral dissertation, MIT, Cambridge, MA.
34. Sells, Peter. 1985. Pied-piping and the feature [WH]. Ms., Stanford University, Stanford, CA.
35. Sternefeld, Wolfgang. 2001. Partial movement constructions, pied-piping and higher order choice functions. In Audiatur vox sapientiae: A festschrift for Arnim von Stechow, ed. by Caroline Féry and Wolfgang Sternefeld, 473-486. Berlin: Akademie Verlag.
36. Szabolcsi, Anna. 1994. The noun phrase. In The syntactic structure of Hungarian, ed. by Ferenc Kiefer and Katalin É. Kiss, 179-274. San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
37. Watanabe, Akira. 1992. Wh-in-situ, Subjacency, and chain formation. MIT Occasional Papers in Linguistics 3. Cambridge, MA: MIT, MIT Working Papers in Linguistics.
38. Watanabe, Akira. 2006. The pied-piper feature. In Wh-movement: Moving on, ed. by Lisa Lai-Shen Cheng and Norbert Corver, 47-70. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
39. Webelhuth, Gert. 1992. Principles and parameters of syntactic saturation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
40. Yatsushiro, Kazuko. 2001. The distribution of mo and ka and its implications. In Formal Approaches to Japanese Linguistics 3, ed. by Mari{dotless}́a Cristina Cuervo, Daniel Harbour, Ken Hiraiwa, and Shinichiro Ishihara, 181-198. MIT Working Papers in Linguistics 41. Cambridge, MA: MIT, MIT Working Papers in Linguistics.
41. Yoshida, Keiko, and Tomoyuki Yoshida. 1996. Question marker drop in Japanese. ICU (International Christian University) Language Research Bulletin 11:37-54.