On certain properties of pied-piping

Linguistic Inquiry

Volumn 40, Issue 1, 2009, Pages 75-111

  Heck, Fabian ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF LEIPZIG   (Germany)

Author keywords

Agree; feature percolation; Minimalist program; Optimality theory; Phases; Pied piping; Successive cyclicity; Wh movement

Indexed keywords

EID: 59849117432     PISSN: 00243892     EISSN: 00243892     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1162/ling.2009.40.1.75     Document Type: Article

References (111)

1. Abels, Klaus. 2003. Successive cyclicity, anti-locality, and adposition stranding. Doctoral dissertation, University of Connecticut. Storrs.
2. Abney, Steven. 1986. Functional elements and licensing. Ms., MIT, Cambridge, MA.
3. Aissen, Judith. 1996. Pied piping, abstract agreement, and functional projections in Tzotzil. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 14:447-491.
4. Aoun, Joseph. 1986. Generalized binding, Dordrecht: Foris,
5. Aoun, Joseph, Norbert Hornstein, and Dominique Sportiche. 1981. On some aspects of wide scope interpretation. Journal of Linguistic Research 1:89-95.
6. Baker, Mark. 1988. Incorporation: A theory of grammatical function changing. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
7. Besten, Hans den. 1984. The ergative hypothesis and free word order in Dutch and German. In Studies in German grammar, ed. by Jindřich Toman, 23-64. Dordrecht: Foris.
8. Boeckx, Cedric. 2001. Mechanisms of chain formation. Doctoral dissertation. University of Connecticut. Storrs.
9. Boivin, Marie-Claude. 2005. Case theory, DP movement, and interpretation: A new approach to the distribution of French subnominal clitic en. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 23:543-593.
10. Borsley, Robert. 1992. More on the difference between English restrictive and nonrestrictive relative clauses. Journal of Linguistics 28:139-148.
11. Bošković. Željko. 2004. Be careful where you float your quantifiers. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 22:681-742.
12. Bouchard, Denis. 1982. On the content of empty categories. Doctoral dissertation, MIT, Cambridge, MA.
13. Broadwell, George Aaron. 2001. Optimal order and pied-piping in San Dionicio Zapotec. In Formal and empirical issues in optimality theoretic syntax, ed. by Peter Sells, 197-224. Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications.
14. Cable, Seth. 2007. The grammar of Q: Q-particles and the nature of wh-fronting, as revealed by the whqueslions of Tlingit. Doctoral dissertation, MIT, Cambridge, MA.
15. Cattell, Ray. 1976. Constraints on movement rules. Language 52:18-50.
16. Chomsky, Noam. 1973. Conditions on transformations. In A festschrift for Morris Halle, ed. by Stephen Anderson and Paul Kiparsky, 232-286. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
17. Chomsky, Noam. 1986. Barriers. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
18. Chomsky, Noam. 1995. The Minimalist Program. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
19. Chomsky, Noam. 2000. Minimalist inquiries: The framework. In Step by step: Essays on minimalist syntax in honor of Howard Lasnik, ed. by Roger Martin, David Michaels, and Juan Uriagereka, 89-155. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
20. Chomsky, Noam. 2001. Derivation by phase. In Ken Hale: A life in language, ed. by Michael Kenstowicz, 1-52. Cambridge. MA: MIT Press.
21. Christensen, Ken Ramshøj. 2003. Neg-shift and repair strategies: Pied piping versus preposition stranding. Ms., University of Aarhus.
22. Chung, Sandra. 1991. Functional heads and proper government in Chamorro. Lingua 85:85-134.
23. Chung, Sandra. 1998. The design of agreement. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
24. Cinque, Guglielmo, 1982. On the theory of relative clauses and markedness. The Linguistic Review 1: 247-294.
25. Cinque, Guglielmo. 1990. Types of Ā-dependencies. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
26. Collins, Chris. 1994. Economy of derivation and the Generalized Proper Binding Condition. Linguistic Inquity 25:45-61.
27. Collins, Chris. 1997. Local economy. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
28. Coon, Jessica. 2009. Interrogative possessors and the problem with pied-piping in Chol. Linguistic Inquiry 40.1 (this issue).
29. Corver, Norbert. 1990. The syntax of left branch constructions. Doctoral dissertation. Tilburg University.
30. Cowper, Elizabeth. 1987. Pied piping, feature percolation, and the structure of the noun phrase. Canadian Journal of Linguistics 32:321-338.
31. Déprez, Viviane. 1990. Two ways of moving the verb in French. In Papers on wh-movement, ed. by Lisa L. S. Cheng and Hamida Demirdache, 47-85. MIT Working Papers in linguistics 13. Cambridge. MA: MIT, MIT Working Papers in Linguistics.
32. Di Sciullo, Anna Maria, and Edwin Williams. 1987. On the definition of word. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
33. Epée, Roger. 1976. On some rules that are not successive cyclic in Duala. Linguistic Inquiry 7:193-198.
34. Fabb, Nigel. 1990. The difference between Lnglish restrictive and non-restrictive relative clauses. Journal of Linguistics 26:57-77.
35. Fanselow, Gisbert. and Damir Ćavar. 2002. Distributed deletion. In Theoretical approaches to universals, ed. by Artemis Alexiadou, 65-107. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
36. Fanselow, Gisbert. and Anoop Mahajan. 2000. Towards a minimalist theory of wh-expletives, wh-copying, and successive cyclicity. In Wh-scope marking, ed. by Uli Lutz, Gereon Müller. and Arnim von Stechow, 195-230. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
37. Fiengo, Robert. 1977. On trace theory. Linguistic Inquity 8:35-61.
38. Fleischer. Jürg. 2002. Die Syntax von Pronominaladverbien in den Dialekten des Deutschen. Stuttgart: Steiner.
39. Gallmann, Peter. 1996. Die Steuerung der Flexion in der DP. Linguistische Berichte 164:283-314.
40. Giorgi, Alessandra, and Giuseppe Longobardi. 1991. The syntax of noun phrases. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
41. Godard, Danièle. 1985. French relative clauses with dont: A'-chains and binding principles. In Grammatical representation, ed. by Jacqueline Guéron, Hans-Georg Obenauer. and Jean-Yves Pollock, 19-41. Dordrecht: Eoris.
42. Godard, Danièle. 1988. La syntaxe des relatives en français. Paris: Editions du CNRS.
43. Gouskova, Maria. 2001. Split scrambling: Barriers as violable constraints. In WCCFL 20: Proceedings of the 20th West Coast Conference on Formal Linguistics, ed. by Karine Megerdoomian and Leora Anne Bar-el. 220-233. Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Press.
44. Grewendorf, Günther. 1986. Relativsätze im Deutschen: Die Rattenfanger-Konstruktion. Linguistische Berichie 105:409-434.
45. Grimshaw, Jane. 1991. Extended projections. Ms., Brandeis University. Waltham, MA.
46. Grimshaw, Jane. 2000. Locality and extended projection. In Lexical specification and insertion, ed. by Peter Coopmans, Martin Everaert, and Jane Grimshaw, 115-133. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
47. Grohmann, Kleanthes. 2003. Prolific domains: On the anti-locality of movement dependencies. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
48. Grosu, Alexander. 1994. Three studies in locality and case. London: Routledge.
49. Guiraud, Pierre. 1966. Le système du relatif en français populate. Langages 3:40-48.
50. Haider, Hubert. 1985. Der Rattenfängerei muß ein Ende gemacht werden. Wiener Linguistische Gazette 35/36:27-50.
51. Haider, Hubert, 1988. Zur Struktur der deutschen Nominalphrasc. Zeitschrift für Sprachwissenschaft 7:32-59.
52. Heck, Fabian. 2004. A theory of pied-piping. Doctoral dissertation, Universität Tübingen.
53. Heck, Fabian, and Gereon Müller. 2000. Successive cyclicity. long-distance superiority, and local optimization. In WCCFL 19: Proceedings of the 19th West Coast Conference on Formal Linguistics, ed. by Roger Billerey and Brook Danielle Lillehaugen, 218-231. Somervillc, MA: Cascadilla Press.
54. Heck, Fabian, and Gereon Müller. 2003. Derivational optimization of wh-movement. In Dynamic interfaces, ed. by Kleanthes Grohmann. special issue, Linguistic Analysis 33:97-148.
55. Hirschbühler, Paul. 1978. The semantics and syntax of wh-constructions. Doctoral dissertation, University of Massachusetts, Amherst.
56. Huang, C.-T. James. 1982. Logical relations in Chinese and the theory of grammar. Doctoral dissertation, MIT, Cambridge. MA.
57. Kayne, Richard. 1975. French syntax: The transformational cycle. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
58. Kayne, Richard. 1976. French relative que. In Current studies in Romance linguistics, ed. by Marta Luján and Fritz Hensey, 255-299. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.
59. Kayne, Richard. 1983. Connectedness. Linguistic Inquiry 14:223-249.
60. Kayne, Richard. 1984. Connectedness and binary branching, Dordrecht: Foris.
61. Kayne, Richard. 1994. The antisymmetry of syntax. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
62. Lasnik, Howard, and Mamoru Saito. 1992. Move α. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
63. Lie, Svein. 1982. Discontinuous questions and subjacency in Norwegian. In Readings on unbounded dependencies in Scandinavian languages, ed. by Elisabeth Engdahl and Eva Ejerhed, 193-203. Stockholm: Umeå.
64. Lieber, Rochelle. 1980. On the organization of the lexicon. Doctoral dissertation, MIT. Cambridge. MA.
65. Lutz, Uli. and Susanne Trissler. 1997. On some cases of complex pied piping in German. Ms., Universität Tübingen.
66. May, Robert. 1985. Logical Form: Its structure and derivation. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
67. McCawley, James D. 1982. Parentheticals and discontinuous structure. Linguistic Inquiry 13:91-106.
68. McCloskey. James. 2002. Resumption, successive cyclicily, and the locality of operations. In Derivation and explanation in the Minimalist Program, ed. by Samuel David Epstein and T. Daniel Seely, 184-228. Oxford: Blackwell.
69. Moritz, Luc, and Daniel Valois. 1994. Pied-piping and specifier-head agreement. Linguistic Inquiry 25: 667-707.
70. Müller, Gereon. 2000. Das Pronominaladverb als Reparaturphanomen. Linguistische Berichte 182:139-178.
71. Müller, Gereon. 2004. Phrase impenetrability and wh-intervention. In Minimality effects in syntax, ed. by Arthur Stepanov, Gisbert Fansclow, and Ralph Vogel, 289-325. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
72. Muriungi, Peter Kinyua. 2003. wh-questions in Kitharaka. Master's thesis, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg.
73. Nakamura, Masanori. 2002. On feature movement. In Dimensions of movement, ed. by Artemis Alexiadou, Elena Anagnostopoulou, Sjef Barbiers, and Hans-Martin Gärtner, 243-268. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
74. Nanni, Debbie L., and Justine T. Stillings. 1978. Three remarks on pied piping. Linguistic Inquiry 9:310-318.
75. Oppenrieder, Wilhelm. 1991. Preposition-Stranding im Deutschen? Da will ich nichts von hören. In Strukturen und Merkmale syntaktischer Kategorien, ed. by Gisbert Fanselow and Sascha Felix, 159-173. Tübingen: Narr.
76. Ortiz de Urbina, Ion. 1990. Operator feature percolation and clausal pied-piping. In Papers on wh-movement. ed. by Lisa L. S. Cheng and Hamida Demirdache. 193-208. MIT Working Papers in linguistics 13. Cambridge, MA: MIT. MIT Working Papers in Linguistics.
77. Pollock, Jean-Yves. 1986. Sur la syntaxe de en et le paramètre du sujet nul. In La grammaire modulaire. ed. by Mitsou Ronat and Daniel Couquaux, 211-246. Paris: Editions de Minuit.
78. Pollock. Jean-Yvcs. 1993, Opérateurs nuls, dont, questions indircctcs et théorie de la quantification. In Hommages à Nicolas Ruwet, cd. by Lilianc Tasmowski and Anne Zribi-Hertz. 440-463. Ghent: Communication and Cognition.
79. Prince, Alan, and Paul Smolensky. 2004. Constraint interaction in generative grammar. In Optimality Theory in phonology: A reader, ed. by John J. McCarthy, 3-71. Oxford: Blackwell.
80. Rappaport, Gilbert. 1995. Wh-movement-in-Comp in Slavic syntax and in Logical Form. Journal of Slavic Linguistics 3:308-356.
81. Reinhart, Tanya. 1983. Anaphora and semantic interpretation. London: Croom Helm.
82. Reis, Marga. 1995. Extractions from verb-second clauses in German? In On extraction and extraposition in German, ed. by Uli Lutz and Jürgen Pafel. 45-88. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
83. Reis, Marga. 2000. On the parenthetical features of German was. w-constructions and how to account for them. In Wh-scope marking, ed. by Uli Lutz, Gereon Miiller, and Arnim von Stechow, 357-407. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
84. Riemsdijk, Henk van. 1978. A case study in syntactic markedness: The binding nature of prepositional phrases. Dordrecht: Foris.
85. Riemsdijk, Henk van. 1985. On pied piped infinitives in German relative clauses. In Studies in German grammar, ed. by Jindřich Toman, 165-192. Dordrecht: Foris.
86. Riemsdijk, Henk van. 1989. Movement and regeneration. In Dialectal variation and the theory of grammar, ed. by Paola Benincà, 105-1.36. Dordrecht: Foris.
87. Rizzi, Luigi. 1996. Residual verb second and the Wh-Critcrion. In Parameters and functioned heads: Essays in comparative syntax, ed. by Adriana Beheld and Luigi Rizzi. 63-90. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
88. Roeper, Tom. 2003. Multiple grammars, feature attraction, pied-piping, and the question: Is AGR inside TP? In (In) vulnerable domains in multilingualism, ed. by Natascha Müller, 335-360. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
89. Ross, John Robert. 1967. Constraints on variables in syntax. Doctoral dissertation, MIT. Cambridge, MA.
90. Ross, John Robert. 1986. Infinite syntax! Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
91. Ruwet, Nicolas. 1972. La syntaxe du pronom en et la transformation de montée du sujet. In Théorie syntaxique et syntaxe du français, ed. by Nicolas Ruwet, 48-86. Paris: Editions du Seuil.
92. Safir, Ken. 1986. Relative clauses in a theory of binding and levels. Linguistic Inquiry 17:663-689.
93. Sells, Peter. 1985. Pied piping and the feature [wh]. Ms., Stanford University. Stanford, CA.
94. Smith-Stark, Thomas. 1988. 'Pied-piping' con inversion en preguntas parciales. Ms., Centra de estudios lingüísticos y literarios, Colegio de México y Seminario de lenguas indígenas, Mexico City.
95. Sportiche, Dominique. 1998. Partitions and atoms of clause structure. London: Routledge.
96. Starke, Michal. 2001. Move dissolves into Merge: A theory of locality. Doctoral dissertation, Université de Genève.
97. Stemefeld, Wolfgang. 1991. Syntaktische Grenzen. Opladen: Westdeutscher Verlag.
98. Svenonius, Peter. 2003. On the edge. Ms., Universitetet i Tromsø.
99. Takahashi, Daiko. 1997. Move-f and null operator movement. The Linguistic Review 14:181-196.
100. Tellier, Christine. 1990. Subjacency and Subject Condition violations in French. Linguistic Inquiry 21: 306-311.
101. Tellier, Christine. 1991. Licensing theory and French parasitic gaps. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
102. Torrence, Harold. 2005. Asking questions quietly: The syntax of silent wh-words in Wolof. Ms., University of Kansas, Lawrence.
103. Trissler, Susanne. 1993. P-Stranding bei R-PPen im Deutschen. Ms., Universität Tübingen.
104. Trissler, Susanne. 1999. Syntaktische Bedingungen für tv-Merkmale: Zur Bildung interrogativer w-Phrasen im Deutschen. Doctoral dissertation. Universität Tübingen.
105. Valois, Daniel, and Fernando Dupuis. 1992. On the status of (verbal) traces in French: The case of stylistic inversion. In Romance languages andlinguistic theory, ed. by Paul Hirschbühler and Konrad Koerner, 325-338. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
106. Vergnaud, Jean-Roger. 1974. French relative clauses. Doctoral dissertation. MIT, Cambridge, MA.
107. Vikner, Sten. 1995. Verb movement and expletive subjects in the Germanic languages, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
108. Vries, Mark de. 2005. Possessive relatives and (heavy) pied-piping. Journal of Comparative Germanic Linguistics 9:1-52.
109. Watanabe, Akira. 1992. wh-in-situ, subjacency, and chain formation. MIT Occasional Papers in Linguistics 2. Cambridge, MA: MIT, MIT Working Papers in Linguistics.
110. Webelhuth, Gert. 1992. Principles and parameters of syntactic saturation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
111. Wexler, Kenneth, and Peter W. Culicover. 1980. Formal principles of language acquisition. Cambridge. MA: MIT Press.