The Grammar of Q: Q-Particles, Wh-Movement, and Pied-Piping

The Grammar of Q: Q-Particles, Wh-Movement, and Pied-Piping

Volumn , Issue , 2010, Pages 1-320

  Cable, Seth ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MASSACHUSETTS   (United States)

Author keywords

Intervention effect; Left branch extraction; P stranding; Pied piping; Q particle; Superiority; Tlingit; Wh fronting; Wh questions

Indexed keywords

EID: 78449311919     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195392265.001.0001     Document Type: Book

References (189)

1. Abels, Klaus. 2003. Successive cyclicity, anti-locality, and adposition stranding. Doctoral dissertation. Storrs, CT: University of Connecticut.
2. Aissen, Judith. 1996. Pied piping, abstract agreement and functional projections in Tzotzil. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 14: 447-491.
3. Aoun, Joseph, Elabbas Benmamoun, and Dominique Sportiche. 1994. Agreement, word order and conjunction in some varieties of Arabic. Linguistic Inquiry 25: 195-220.
4. Aoun, Joseph, Elabbas Benmamoun, and Dominique Sportiche. 1999. Further remarks on first conjunct agreement. Linguistic Inquiry 30: 669-681.
5. Aronoff, Mark. 1976. Word formation in generative grammar. Cambridge, MA:MIT Press.
6. Arregi, Karlos. 2003a. Clausal pied-piping. Natural Language Semantics 11: 115-143.
7. Arregi, Karlos. 2003b. Focus on Basque movements. Doctoral dissertation. Cambridge, MA: Massachusetts Institute of Technology.
8. Babyonyshev, Maria. 1996. Structural connections in syntax and processing:Studies in Russian and Japanese. Doctoral dissertation. Cambridge, MA:Massachusetts Institute of Technology.
9. Baker, C. L. 1970. Notes on the description of English questions: The role of an abstract question morpheme. Foundations of Language 6: 197-219.
10. Baker, Mark. 1999. On the interplay of the universal and the particular: Case studies in Edo. In Proceedings of the 35th Annual Meeting of the Chicago Linguistics Society, ed. by Sabrina J. Billings, John P. Boyle, and Aaron M. Griffith. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
11. Barss, Andrew, Ken Hale, Ellavina Tsosie Perkins, and Margret Speas. 1991. Logical form and barriers and Navajo. In Logical structure and linguistic structure, ed. by C.-T. James Huang and Robert May. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic.
12. Beck, Sigrid. 1996. Quantified structures as barriers for LF movement. Natural Language Semantics 4: 1-56.
13. Beck, Sigrid. 2006. Intervention effects follow from focus interpretation. Natural Language Semantics 14: 1-56.
14. Bennett, Paul. 1995. A course in Generalized Phrase Structure Grammar. London: University College London Press.
15. Black, Lydia T., Nora Marks Dauenhauer, and Richard Dauenhauer. 2008. Classics of Tlingit oral literature, Volume 4: Anóoshi Lingít aaní ká, Russians in Tlingit America: The Battles of Sitka, 1802 and 1804. Juneau, AK: Sealaska Heritage Foundation.
16. Boas, Franz. 1917. Grammatical notes on the language of the Tlingit Indians. University of Pennsylvania University Museum Anthropological Publications 8:1.
17. Bobaljik, Jonathan. 2002. A-chains at the PF-interface: Copies and 'covert' movement. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 20: 197-267.
18. Boeckx, Cedric. 2009. On the locus of asymmetry in UG. Catalan Journal of Linguistics 8: 41-53.
19. Borsley, Robert. 1992. More on the difference between English restrictive and non-restrictive relative clauses. Journal of Linguistics 28: 139-148.
20. Bošković, Željko. 2005a. On the locality of left branch extraction and the structure of NP. Studia Linguistica 59: 1-45.
21. Bošković, Željko. 2005b. On the locality of Merge and Agree. Cambridge, MA:MIT Working Papers in Linguistics.
22. Bresnan, Joan. 1976. On the form and function of transformations. Linguistic Inquiry 7: 3-40.
23. Bresnan, Joan, and Jane Grimshaw. 1978. The syntax of free relatives in English. Linguistic Inquiry 9: 331-391.
24. Brody, Michael. 1997. Perfect chains. In Elements of grammar, ed. by Liliane Haegeman. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic.
25. Bury, Dirk, and Ad Neeleman. 1999. Projection of free relatives. Manuscript. University College London.
26. Cable, Seth. 2006a. The interrogative words of Tlingit: An informal grammatical study. Manuscript. University of Massachusetts, Amherst. Retrieved July 25, 2009, from http://people.umass.edu/scable/papers/Tlingit-Interrogatives-Grammar.pdf.
27. Cable, Seth. 2006b. Syncope in the verbal prefixes of Tlingit: Meter and surface phonotactics. Muenchen: Lincom Europa.
28. Cable, Seth. 2007. The grammar of Q: Q-particles and the nature of whfronting, as revealed by the wh questions of Tlingit. Doctoral dissertation. Cambridge, MA: Massachusetts Institute of Technology.
29. Cable, Seth. 2008. Question particles and the nature of wh-fronting. In Quantification: A cross-linguistic perspective, ed. by Lisa Matthewson. North Holland Linguistic Series, Linguistic Variations, Vol. 64. Bingly, UK: Emerald.
30. Campbell, Lyle. 1997. American Indian languages: The historical linguistics of Native America. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
31. Carlson, Gregory N., and Francis Jeffry Pelletier. 1995. The generic book. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
32. Cheng, Lisa Lai-Shen. 1991. On the typology of wh-questions. Doctoral dissertation. Cambridge, MA: Massachusetts Institute of Technology.
33. Cheung, Lawrence Y.-L. 2003. On certain (non-)violations of coordinate structure constraints. Snippets 12: 9-11.
34. Chomsky, Noam. 1973. Conditions on transformations. In A festschrift for Morris Halle, ed. by Stephen Anderson and Paul Kiparsky. New York: Holt, Reinhart & Winston.
35. Chomsky, Noam. 1975. Questions of form and interpretation. Linguistic Analysis 1: 75-109.
36. Chomsky, Noam. 1995. The Minimalist Program. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
37. Chomsky, Noam. 2000. Minimalist inquiries: The framework. In Step by step:Essays on minimalism in honor of Howard Lasnik, ed. by Roger Martin, David Michaels, and Juan Uriagereka. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
38. Citko, Barbara. 2009. What don't wh-questions, free relatives and correlatives have in common? In Correlatives Cross-Linguistically, ed. by Anikó Lipták. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing.
39. Cole, Peter, and Gabriella Hermon. 1981. Subjecthood and islandhood:Evidence from Quechua. Linguistic Inquiry 12: 1-30.
40. Cole, Peter, and Gabriella Hermon. 1998. The typology of wh-movement: Whquestions in Malay. Syntax 1: 221-258.
41. Comorovski, Ileana. 1996. Interrogative phrases and the syntax-semantics interface. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic.
42. Coon, Jessica. 2009. Interrogative possessors and the problem with piedpiping in Chol. Linguistic Inquiry 40: 165-175.
43. Corver, Norbert. 1990. The syntax of left branch extractions. Katholieke Universiteit Brabant.
44. Corver, Norbert. 1992. Left branch extraction. In Proceedings of the Northeast Linguistics Society 22. Amherst, MA: Graduate Linguistic Student Publications.
45. Corver, Norbert. 2007. Subextraction. In The Blackwell syntax companion (SYNCOM), ed. by Martin Everaert and Henk van Riemsdijk. Oxford:Blackwell.
46. Cowper, Elizabeth. 1987. Pied-piping, feature percolation and the structure of the noun phrase. Canadian Journal of Linguistics 32: 321-338.
47. Culicover, Peter. 1999. Syntactic nuts. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
48. Dauenhauer, Nora Marks, and Richard Dauenhauer. 1981. Because we cherish you: Sealaska elders speak to the future. Juneau, AK: Sealaska Heritage Institute.
49. Dauenhauer, Nora Marks, and Richard Dauenhauer. 1987. Classics of Tlingit oral literature, Volume 1: Haa shuká, Our ancestors: Tlingit oral narratives. Juneau, AK: Sealaska Heritage Institute.
50. Dauenhauer, Nora Marks, and Richard Dauenhauer. 1990. Classics of Tlingit oral literature, Volume 2: Haa tuwunáagu yís, For healing our spirit: Tlingit oratory. Juneau, AK: Sealaska Heritage Institute.
51. Dauenhauer, Nora Marks, and Richard Dauenhauer. 1994. Classics of Tlingit oral literature, Volume 3: Haa kusteeyí, Our culture: Tlingit life stories. Juneau, AK: Sealaska Heritage Institute.
52. Dauenhauer, Nora Marks, and Richard Dauenhauer. 2000. Beginning Tlingit. Juneau, AK: Sealaska Heritage Institute.
53. Dauenhauer, Nora Marks, and Richard Dauenhauer. 2002. Lingít x'éináx sá! Say it in Tlingit: A Tlingit phrase book. Juneau, AK: Sealaska Heritage Institute.
54. Dauenhauer, Nora Marks, and Richard Dauenhauer. Forthcoming. Intermediate Tlingit. Juneau, AK: Sealaska Heritage Institute.
55. Davis, Christopher. 2006. Evidence against movement in Japanese relative clauses. Handout from a talk presented at 2006 ECO5. University of Massachusetts, Amherst. Retrieved July 25, 2009 from: http://people.umass.edu/cmdavis/papers/davis-eco5-handout.pdf.
56. Dayal, Veneeta. 1996. Locality in wh-quantification: Questions and relative clauses in Hindi. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic.
57. Dryer, Matthew. 1985. Tlingit: An object-initial language? Canadian Journal of Linguistics 30: 1-13.
58. Dürr, Michael, and Egon Renner. 1995. The history of the Na-Dene controversy: A sketch. In Language and culture in native North America:Studies in honor of Heinz-Jürgen Pinnow, ed. by Michael Dürr, Egon Renner, and Wolfgang Oleschinski. Muenchen: Lincom Europa.
59. Edwards, Keri. Forthcoming. Tlingit verb dictionary project. University of Alaska, Fairbanks.
60. Edwards, Keri, John Marks, Nora Marks Dauenhauer, and Richard Dauenhauer. 2005. Lingít x'éináx áx! Hear it in Tlingit: A Tlingit mini phrase book & CD. Juneau, AK: Sealaska Heritage Institute.
61. Embick, David, and Alec Marantz. 2008. Architecture and blocking. Linguistic Inquiry 39: 1-53.
62. Emonds, Joseph. 1976. A transformational approach to English syntax. New York: Academic Press.
63. Emonds, Joseph. 1979. Appositive relatives have no properties. Linguistic Inquiry 10: 211-243.
64. Enrico, John. 2003. Haida syntax. Lincoln, NE: University of Nebraska Press.
65. Fabb, Nigel. 1990. The difference between English restrictive and nonrestrictive relative clauses. Journal of Linguistics 26: 57-77.
66. Falk, Yehuda N. 2001. Lexical-Functional Grammar: An introduction to parallel constraint-based syntax. Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications.
67. Fanselow, Gisbert. 1991. Minimale syntax. Habilitation thesis. University of Passau.
68. Fanselow, Gisbert. 1997. Minimal link effects in German (and other languages)." Manuscript. University of Potsdam.
69. Featherston, Sam. 2005. Magnitude estimation and what it can do for your syntax: Some wh-constraints in German. Lingua 115: 1525-1550.
70. Fiengo, Robert, C.-T. James Huang, Howard Lasnik, and Tanya Reinhart. 1988. The syntax of wh-in-situ. In Proceedings of the Seventh West Coast Conference on Formal Linguistics (WCCFL 7), ed. by Hagit Borer. Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications.
71. Fodor, Janet Dean, and Ivan A. Sag. 1982. Referential and quantificational indefinites. Linguistics and Philosophy 5: 355-398.
72. Fox, Danny. 2000. Economy and semantic representation. Cambridge, MA:MIT Press.
73. Gazdar, Gerald, Ewan Klein, Geoffrey Pullum, and Ivan Sag. 1985. Generalized phrase structure grammar. Oxford: Blackwell.
74. Ginzburg, Jonathan, and Ivan Sag. 2000. Interrogative investigations:The form, meaning, and use of English interrogatives. Stanford, CA: CLSI Publications.
75. Gordon, Raymond G., Jr. 2005. Ethnologue: Languages of the world, 15th ed. Dallas, TX: SIL International.
76. Grimshaw, Jane. 1981. Form, function and the language acquisition device. In The logical problem of language acquisition, ed. by C. L. Baker and John McCarthy. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
77. Grimshaw, Jane. 2000. Locality and extended projections. In Lexical specification and insertion, ed. by Peter Coopmans, Marin Everaert, and Jane Grimshaw. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing.
78. Groenendijk, Jeroen, and Martin Stokhof. 1982. Semantic analysis of WHcomplements. Linguistics and Philosophy 5: 175-233.
79. Groenendijk, Jeroen, and Martin Stokhof. 1984. Studies on the semantics of questions and the pragmatics of answers. Doctoral dissertation. University of Amsterdam.
80. Groos, Anneke, and Henk van Riemsdijk. 1981. Matching effects in free relatives: A parameter of core grammar. In Theory of markedness in generative grammar, ed. by Andrea Belletti. Pisa: Scuola Normale Superiora.
81. Hagstrom, Paul. 1998. Decomposing questions. Doctoral dissertation. Cambridge, MA: Massachusetts Institute of Technology.
82. Hamblin, C. L. 1958. Questions. Australasian Journal of Philosophy 36: 159-168.
83. Hamblin, C. L. 1973. Questions in Montague English. Foundations of Language 10: 41-53.
84. Haraguchi, Shosuke. 1973. "Dragging" reconsidered. Linguistic Inquiry 4: 95-97.
85. Heck, Fabian. 2004. A Theory of Pied Piping. Doctoral dissertation. Universität Tübingen.
86. Heck, Fabian. 2008. On pied-piping: Wh-movement and beyond. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
87. Heck, Fabian. 2009. On certain properties of pied-piping. Linguistic Inquiry 40: 75-111.
88. Heim, Irene. 1994. Interrogative semantics and Karttunen's semantics for 'know.' In Proceedings of the 9th Annual Conference of the Israel Association for Theoretical Linguistics, ed. by Rhonna Buchall and Anita Mittwoch. Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Press.
89. Heim, Irene, and Angelika Kratzer. 1998. Semantics in generative grammar. Oxford: Blackwell.
90. Holmberg, Anders. 2008. The syntax of the Finnish question particle. Manuscript. University of Newcastle. Retrieved July 25, 2009, from http://ling.auf.net/lingbuzz/000596.
91. Horvath, Julia. 1986. FOCUS in the theory of grammar and the syntax of Hungarian. Dordrecht: Foris.
92. Horvath, Julia. 2000. Interfaces vs. the computational system in the syntax of focus. In Interface strategies, ed. by Hans Bennis, Martin Everaert, and Eric Reuland. Amsterdam: Royal Netherlands Academy of Arts and Sciences.
93. Horvath, Julia. 2007a. Pied-piping. In The Blackwell syntax companion (SYNCOM), ed. by Martin Everaert and Henk van Riemsdijk. Oxford:Blackwell.
94. Horvath, Julia. 2007b. Separating 'focus movement' from focus. In Phrasal and Clausal Architecture: Syntactic Derivation and Interpretation; In Honor of Joseph E. Emonds, ed. by Simin Karimi, Vida Samiian and Wendy K. Wilkins. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing.
95. Huddleston, Rodney D. and Geoffrey K. Pullum. 2002. The Cambridge Grammar of the English Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
96. Ishihara, Roberta. 1984. Clausal pied-piping: A problem for GB. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 2: 397-418.
97. Jackendoff, Ray. 1977. X-bar syntax: A study of phrase structure. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
98. Jacobson, Pauline. 1995. On the quantificational force of English free relatives. In Quantificational in natural languages, ed. by Emmon Bach, Eloise Jelinek, Angelika Kratzer, and Barbara Partee. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic.
99. Jelinek, Eloise. 1984. Empty categories, case and configurationality. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 2: 39-76.
100. Karttunen, Lauri. 1977. Syntax and semantics of questions. Linguistics and Philosophy 1: 3-44.
101. Kayne, Richard. 1983. Connectedness. Linguistic Inquiry 14: 223-249.
102. Kayne, Richard. 1994. The antisymmetry of syntax. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
103. Kayne, Richard. 2000. Parameters and universals. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
104. Kennedy, Christopher, and Jason Merchant. 2000. Attributive comparative deletion. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 18: 89-146.
105. Kishimoto, Hideki. 2005. Wh-in-situ and movement in Sinhala questions. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 23: 1-51.
106. Kiss, Katalin E. 1995. Discourse configurational languages. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
107. Ko, Heejeong. 2005. Syntax of why-in-situ: Merge in [Spec, CP] in the overt syntax. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 23: 867-916.
108. Koopman, Hilda. 2000. Prepositions, postpositions, circumpositions and particles: The structure of Dutch PPs. In The Syntax of Specifiers and Heads:Collected Essays of Hilda J. Koopman. London: Routledge.
109. Koopman, Hilda, and Anna Szabolcsi. 2000. Verbal complexes. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
110. Kratzer, Angelika. 1991. The representation of focus. In Semantics: An international handbook of contemporary research, ed. by Arnim von Stechow and Dieter Wunderlich. New York: Walter de Gruyter.
111. Kratzer, Angelika. 1998. Scope or psuedoscope? Are there widescope indefinites? In Events in Grammar, ed. by Susan Rothstein. Dordrecht:Kluwer.
112. Kratzer, Angelika. 2006. Exhaustive questions. Handout from a talk presented at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology on May 12, 2006. University of Massachusetts, Amherst.
113. Kratzer, Angelika, and Junko Shimoyama. 2002. Indeterminate pronouns:The view from Japanese. In Proceedings of the 3rd Tokyo Conference on Psycholinguistics, ed. by Yukio Otsu. Tokyo: Hituzi Syobo.
114. Kuno, Susumu, and Jane J. Robinson. 1972. Multiple wh-questions. Linguistic Inquiry 3: 463-487.
115. Lasnik, Howard, and Mamoru Saito. 1992. Move-alpha: Conditions on its application and output. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
116. Leer, Jeff. 1991. The schetic categories of the Tlingit verb. Doctoral dissertation. University of Chicago.
117. Leer, Jeff. 1993. The Tlingit anaphoric system and its roots in Na-Dene. Manuscript. Fairbanks, AK: Alaska Native Language Center.
118. Leer, Jeff. 2000. The negative/irrealis category in Athabaskan-Eyak-Tlingit. In The Athabaskan languages: Perspectives on a Native American language family, ed. by Theodore Fernald and Paul Platero. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
119. Leer, Jeff, Doug Hitch, and John Ritter. 2001. Interior Tlingit noun dictionary:The dialects spoken by Tlingit elders of Carcross and Teslin, Yukon, and Atlin, British Columbia. Whitehorse: Yukon Native Language Centre.
120. Lewis, David. 1970. General semantics. Synthese 22: 18-67.
121. Li, Charles N. 1976. Subject and topic. New York: Academic Press.
122. Matsumoto, Yoshiko. 1997. Noun modifying constructions in Japanese. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing.
123. Matthewson, Lisa. 1998. Determiner systems and quantificational strategies:Evidence from Salish. The Hague: Holland Academic Graphics.
124. Matthewson, Lisa. 1999. On the interpretation of wide-scope indefinites. Natural Language Semantics 7: 79-134.
125. May, Robert. 1985. Logical form: Its structure and derivation. Cambridge, MA:MIT Press.
126. Mithun, Mariane. 1999. The languages of native North America. Cambridge:Cambridge University Press.
127. Naish, Constance. 1966. A syntactic study of Tlingit. Language data:Amerindian Series 6. Dallas, TX: SIL International.
128. Nanni, Deborah, and Justine Stillings. 1978. Three remarks on pied piping. Linguistic Inquiry 9: 310-318.
129. Newman, Paul, and Martha Ratliff. 2001. Linguistic fieldwork. Cambridge Cambridge University Press.
130. Nichols, Johanna. 1986. Head-marking and dependent-marking grammar. Language 62: 56-119.
131. Nishigauchi, Taisuke. 1990. Quantification in the theory of grammar. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic.
132. Nyman, Elizabeth, and Jeff Leer. 1993. Gágiwdul.àt: Brought forth to reconfirm. The legacy of a Taku River Tlingit clan. Fairbanks, AK: Alaska Native Language Center.
133. Pesetsky, David. 1982. Paths and categories. Doctoral dissertation. Cambridge, MA: Massachusetts Institute of Technology.
134. Pesetsky, David. 1987. Wh-in-Situ: Movement and unselective binding. In The representation of (in)definiteness, ed. by Eric Reuland and Alice G. B. ter Meulen. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
135. Pesetsky, David. 2000. Phrasal movement and its kin. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
136. Pesetsky, David, and Esther Torrego. 2001. T-to-C movement:Causes and consequences. In Ken Hale: A life in language, ed. by Michael Kenstowicz. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
137. Pesetsky, David, and Esther Torrego. 2007. The syntax of valuation and the interpretability of features. In Phrasal and clausal architecture: Syntactic derivation and interpretation, ed. by Simin Karimi, Vida Samiian, and Wendy K. Wilkins. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing.
138. Postal, Paul. 1972. Two remarks on dragging. Linguistic Inquiry 3: 130-136.
139. Quinn, Steven. 2007. Perseverance to do 'Macbeth' in Tlingit." Associated Press article. Retrieved July 25, 2009, from http://www.sealaskaheritage.org/news/news_article_tlingit_macbeth_2_2007.htm.
140. Reinhart, Tanya. 1992. Wh-in-situ: An apparent paradox. In Proceedings of the Eighth Amsterdam Colloquium, ed. by Paul Dekker and Martin Stokhof. Amsterdam: ILLC.
141. Reinhart, Tanya. 1995. Interface strategies. Utrecht: OTS Working Papers in Linguistics.
142. Reinhart, Tanya. 1997. Quantifier scope: How labor is divided between QR and choice functions. Linguistics and Philosophy 20: 335-397.
143. Reinhart, Tanya. 2006. Interface strategies: optimal and costly computations. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
144. Richards, Norvin. 1997. What moves where in which language? Doctoral dissertation. Cambridge, MA: Massachusetts Institute of Technology.
145. Rizzi, Luigi. 1997. The fine structure of the left periphery. In Elements of grammar, ed. by Liliane Haegeman. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic.
146. Rooryck, Johan. 1994. Generalized transformation and the wh-cycle: Free relatives as bare wh-CPs. Groninger Arbeiten zur Germanistischen Linguistik 37: 195-208.
147. Rooth, Mats. 1985. Association with focus. Doctoral Dissertation. University of Massachusetts, Amherst.
148. Rooth, Mats. 1992. A theory of focus interpretation. Natural Language Semantics 1: 75-116.
149. Ross, John Robert. 1967. Constraints on variables in syntax. Doctoral dissertation. Cambridge, MA: Massachusetts Institute of Technology.
150. Ross, John Robert. 1979. Wem der Kasus schlagt. Linguistiche Berichte 63: 26-32.
151. Rullmann, Hotze, Lisa Matthewson, and Henry Davis. 2008. Modals as distributive indefinites. Natural Language Semantics 16: 317-357.
152. Ruys, Eddy. 1992. The Scope of Indefinites. Doctoral dissertation. University of Utrecht.
153. Ruys, Eddy. 2000. Weak crossover as a scope phenomenon. Linguistic Inquiry 31: 513-539.
154. Safir, Kenneth. 1986. Relative clauses in a theory of binding and levels. Linguistic Inquiry 17: 663-689.
155. Safir, Kenneth. 2009. Viable syntax: Rethinking minimalist architecture. Manuscript. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University.
156. Sag, Ivan A., Inbal Arnon, Bruno Estigarribia, Philip Hofmeister, T. Florian Jaeger, Jeanette Pettibone, and Neal Snider. 2006. Processing accounts for Superiority effects. Manuscript. Stanford University. Retrieved July 25, 2009, from http://lingo.stanford.edu/sag/papers/squib.pdf.
157. Samarin, William J. 1967. Field linguistics: A guide to linguistic fieldwork. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.
158. Sauerland, Uli, and Fabian Heck. 2003. LF-intervention effects in pied-piping. In Proceedings of NELS 33, ed. by Makoto Kadowaki and Shigeto Kawahara. Amherst, MA: GLSA.
159. Schwarzschild, Roger. 2002. Singleton indefinites. Journal of Semantics 19: 289-314.
160. Sells, Peter. 1985. Pied-piping and the feature [WH]. Manuscript. Stanford University.
161. Sealaska Heritage Institute. 2003. Sealaska Heritage Institute website. Retrieved July 25, 2009, from http://www.sealaskaheritage.org.
162. Sharvit, Yael. 1998. Possessive wh-expressions and reconstruction. In Proceedings of NELS 28, ed. by Pius Tamanji and Kiyomi Kusumoto. Amherst, MA: GLSA.
163. Shimoyama, Junko. 2001. Wh-constructions in Japanese. Doctoral dissertation. University of Massachusetts, Amherst.
164. Sternefeld, Wolfgang. 2001. Partial movement constructions, pied-piping and higher order choice functions. In Audiatur vox wapientiae-A festschrift for Arnim von Stechow, ed. by Caroline Fery and Wolfgang Sternefeld. Berlin:Akademie Verlag.
165. Story, Gillian. 1966. A morphological study of Tlingit. Language data:Amerindian Series 7. Dallas, TX: SIL International.
166. Story, Gillian. 1995. An analyzed Tlingit procedural text. In Language and culture in native North America: Studies in honor of Heinz-Jürgen Pinnow, ed. by Michael Dürr, Egon Renner, and Wolfgang Oleschinski. Muenchen: Lincom Europa.
167. Story, Gillian, and Constance Naish. 1973. Tlingit verb dictionary. Fairbanks, AK: Alaska Native Language Center.
168. Story, Gillian, Constance Naish, Henry Davis, and Jeff Leer. 1976. Tlingit noun dictionary. Fairbanks, AK: Sheldon Jackson College.
169. Swanton, John, R. 1909. Tlingit myths and texts. Washington, DC: Bureau of American Ethnology. Reprinted 1970. Hamburg, MI: Native American Book Publishers.
170. Swanton, John R. 1911. Tlingit. In Handbook of American Indian languages, Part 1, ed. by Franz Boas. Washington, DC: Bureau of American Ethnology.
171. Szabolcsi, Anna. 1994. The noun phrase. In The syntactic structure of Hungarian, ed. by Ferenc Kiefer, Katalin E. Kiss, and Lyn Frazier. San Diego:Academic Press.
172. Tanaka, Hidekazu. 1998. Conditions on logical form derivations and representations. Doctoral dissertation. Montreal: McGill University.
173. Tanaka, Hidekazu. 1999. LF wh-islands and the minimal scope principle. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 17: 371-402.
174. Thompson, Chad. 1996. The Na-Dene middle voice: An impersonal source of the D-element. International Journal of American Linguistics 62: 351-378.
175. Uriagereka, Juan. 1988. On government. Doctoral dissertation. Storrs, CT:University of Connecticut.
176. Vajda, Edward. 2009. A Siberian link with the Na-Dene. Archeological Papers of the University of Alaska 6: 75-156.
177. van Riemsdijk, Henk. 1978. A case study in syntactic markedness: The binding nature of prepositional phrases. Lisse: Peter de Ridder Press.
178. van Riemsdijk, Henk. 2007. Free relatives. In The Blackwell syntax companion (SYNCOM), ed. by Martin Everaert and Henk van Riemsdijk. Oxford: Blackwell.
179. Velten, Henry. 1939. Two southern Tlingit tales. International Journal of American Linguistics 5: 65-74.
180. Velten, Henry. 1944. Three Tlingit stories. International Journal of American Linguistics 10: 168-180.
181. Veniaminov, Ioann. 1846. Zamechaniya o Koloshenskom i kad'yakskom Yasykakh. St. Petersburg: Academia Nauk.
182. von Stechow, Arnim. 1996. Against LF pied piping. Natural Language Semantics 4: 57-110.
183. Watanabe, Akira. 1992. Wh-in-situ, subjacency and chain formation. Cambridge, MA: MIT Working Papers in Linguistics.
184. Watanabe, Akira. 2006. The pied-piper feature. In Wh-movement: Moving on, ed. by Lisa Lai-Shen Cheng, and Norbert Corver. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
185. Webelhuth, Gert. 1992. Principles and parameters of syntactic saturation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
186. Williams, Frank, Emma Williams, and Jeff Leer. 1978. Tongass texts. Fairbanks, AK: Alaska Native Language Center.
187. Winter, Yoad. 1997. Choice functions and the scopal semantics of indefinites. Linguistics and Philosophy 20: 399-467.
188. Yatsushiro, Kazuko. 2001. The distribution of mo and ka and its implications. In Formal approaches to Japanese linguistics 3, ed. by Maria Christina Cuervo, Daniel Harbour, Ken Hiraiwa, and Shinichiro Ishihara. MIT Working Papers in Linguistics 41. Cambridge, MA: MIT Working Papers in Linguistics.
189. Yoshida, Keiko, and Tomoyuki Yoshida. 1996. Question marker drop in Japanese. ICU Language Research Bulletin 11: 37-54.