Genotype-by-environment interactions for female preference

Journal of Evolutionary Biology

Volumn 23, Issue 12, 2010, Pages 2550-2557

  Narraway, C ^a   Hunt, J ^a   Wedell, N ^a   Hosken, D J ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF EXETER   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Drosophila; Genotype by environment interaction; GxE; Isoline; Mate choice; Sexual selection

Indexed keywords

DISPLAY BEHAVIOR; FEMALE BEHAVIOR; FLY; GENETIC VARIATION; GENOTYPE-ENVIRONMENT INTERACTION; LIFE HISTORY TRAIT; MATE CHOICE; PREFERENCE BEHAVIOR; SEXUAL SELECTION;

ANIMAL; ARTICLE; DROSOPHILA MELANOGASTER; ENVIRONMENT; FEMALE; GENETICS; GENOTYPE; MALE; MATE CHOICE; PHYSIOLOGY;

ANIMALS; DROSOPHILA MELANOGASTER; ENVIRONMENT; FEMALE; GENOTYPE; MALE; MATING PREFERENCE, ANIMAL;

DROSOPHILA MELANOGASTER;

EID: 78449259242     PISSN: 1010061X     EISSN: 14209101     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1420-9101.2010.02113.x     Document Type: Article

References (73)

1. Acebes, A., Cobb, M. & Ferveur, J.-F. 2003. Species-specific effects of single sensillum ablation on mating position in Drosophila. J. Exp. Biol. 206: 3095-3100.
2. Agrawal, A.F. & Stinchcombe, J.R. 2009. How much do genetic covariance's alter the rate of adaptation? Proc. R. Soc. B 276: 1183-1191.
3. Andersson, M. 1994. Sexual Selection. Princeton University Press, Princeton.
4. Arnold, S.J. 1983. Sexual selection: the interface of theory and empiricism. In: Mate Choice (P. Bateson, ed.), pp. 67-107. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
5. Avent, T.D., Price, T.A.R. & Wedell, N. 2008. Age-based female preference in the fruitfly Drososphila pseudoobscura. Anim. Behav. 75: 1413-1421.
6. Bakker, T.C.M. & Pomiankowski, A. 1995. The genetic basis of female mate preferences. J. Evol. Biol. 8: 129-171.
7. Becker, W.A. 1984. Manual of Quantitative Genetics. Washington State University, Pullman.
8. Bussière, L.F., Hunt, J., Stolting, K.N., Jennions, M.D. & Brooks, R. 2008. Mate choice for genetic quality when environments vary: suggestions for empirical progress. Genetica 143: 69-78.
9. Casares, P., Carracedo, M.C., Pineiro, R., San Miguel, E. & Garica-Florez, L. 1992. Genetic basis for female receptivity in Drosophila melanogaster: a diallel study. Heredity 69: 400-411.
10. Champion de Crespigny, F.E. & Wedell, N. 2006. Wolbachia infection reduces sperm competitive ability in an insect. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 273: 1455-1458.
11. Chenoweth, S.F. & Blows, M.W. 2005. Contrasting mutual sexual selection on homologous signal traits in Drosophila serrata. Am. Nat. 165: 281-289.
12. Cronin, H. 1991. The Ant and the Peacock. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
13. Darwin, C. 1871. The Decent of Man and Selection in Relation to Sex. John Murray, London.
14. David, J.R., Gibert, P., Legout, H., Pétavy, G., Capy, P. & Moreteau, B. 2005. Isofemale lines in Drosophila: an empirical approach to quantitative trait analysis in natural populations. Heredity 94: 3-12.
15. Eberhard, W.G. 2002. The function of female resistance behavior: intromission by male coercion vs. female cooperation in sepsid flies (Diptera: Sepsidae). Rev. Biol. Trop. 52: 485-505.
16. Etges, W.J., De Oliveira, C.C., Gragg, E., Ortiz-Barriiento, D., Noor, M.A.F. & Ritchie, M.G. 2007. Genetics of incipient speciation in Drosophila mojavensis. I. Male courtship song, mating success and genotype x environment interactions. Evolution 61: 1106-1119.
17. Falconer, D.S. 1981. Introduction to Quantitative Genetics. Longman, London.
18. Falconer, D.S. & Mackay, T.F.C. 1996. Introduction to Quantitative Genetics. Longman, London.
19. Frank, S.A. & Slatkin, M. 1990. Evolution in a variable environment. Am. Nat. 136: 244-260.
20. Gay, L., Eady, P.E., Vasudev, R., Hosken, D.J. & Tregenza, T. 2009. Does reproductive isolation evolve faster in larger populations via sexually antagonistic selection? Biol. Lett. 5: 693-696.
21. Gowaty, P.A., Steinichen, R. & Andersson, W.W. 2002. Mutual interest between the sexes and reproductive success in Drosophila pseudoobscura. Evolution 56: 2537-2540.
22. Greenfield, M.D. & Rodriguez, R. 2004. Genotype-environment interaction and the reliability of mating signals. Anim. Behav. 68: 1461-1468.
23. Head, M.L., Hunt, J., Jennions, M.D. & Brooks, R. 2005. The indirect benefits of mating with attractive males outweigh the direct costs. PLoS Biol. 3: e33.
24. Heisler, L. 1984. Inheritance of female mating preference for yellow locus in genotypes of Drosophila melanogaster. Genet. Res. 44: 133-149.
25. Heisler, I.L. 1994. Quantitative genetic models of the evolution of mating behaviour. In: Quantitative Genetic Studies of Behavioral Evolution (C.R.B. Boake, ed.), pp. 101-125. University of Chicago Press, Chicago.
26. Heisler, L., Andersson, M., Arnold, S.J., Boake, C.R., Borgia, G., Hausfater, G., Kirkpatrick, M., Lande, R., Maynard Smith, J., O'Donald, P., Thornhill, R. & Weissing, F. 1987. Evolution of mating preferences and sexually selected traits. In: Sexual Selection: Testing the Alternatives (J.W. Bradbury & M. Andersson, eds), pp. 97-118. John Wiley & Sons, New York.
27. Higginson, A.D. & Reader, T. 2009. Environmental heterogeneity, genotype by environment interactions and the reliability of sexual traits as indicators of mate quality. Proc. R. Soc. B 276: 1153-1159.
28. Hoffmann, A.A. 1999. Is the heritability for courtship and mating speed in Drosophila (fruit fly) low? Heredity 82: 158-162.
29. Hoffmann, A.A. & Parsons, P.A. 1988. The analysis of quantitative variation in natural populations with isofemale strains. Genet. Sel. Evol. 20: 87-98.
30. Hosken, D.J., Taylor, M.L., Hoyle, K., Higgins, S. & Wedell, N. 2008. Attractive males have greater success in sperm competition. Curr. Biol. 18: R553-R554.
31. Hosken, D.J., Martin, O.Y., Wigby, S., Chapman, T. & Hodgson, D.J. 2009. Sexual conflict and reproductive isolation in flies. Biol. Lett. 5: 697-699.
32. Houde, A.E. & Torio, A.J. 1992. Effect of parasitic infection on male color patterns and female mate choice in guppies. Behav. Ecol. 3: 346-351.
33. Hunt, J., Bussière, L.F., Jennions, M.D. & Brooks, R. 2004. What is genetic quality. Trends Ecol. Evol. 19: 329-333.
34. Ingleby, F.C., Hunt, J. & Hosken, D.J. 2010. The role of genotype-by-environment interactions in sexual selection. J. Evol. Biol., doi:.
35. Jennions, M.D. & Petrie, M. 1997. Variation in mate choice and mating preferences: a review of causes and consequences. Biol. Rev. 72: 283-327.
36. Jia, F.Y., Greenfield, M.D. & Collins, R.D. 2000. Genetic variance of sexually selected traits in waxmoths: maintenance by genotype x environment interactions. Evolution 54: 953-967.
37. Jones, T.M. & Quinnell, R.J. 2002. Testing predictions for the evolution of lekking in the sandfly, Lutzomyia longipalpis. Anim. Behav. 63: 605-612.
38. Kirkpatrick, M. 1987. Sexual selection by female choice in polygynous animals. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 18: 43-70.
39. Kirkpatrick, M., Rand, A.S. & Ryan, M.J. 2006. Mate choice rules in animals. Anim. Behav. 72: 1215-1225.
40. Kyriacou, C.P. & Hall, J.C. 1986. Interspecific genetic control of courtship song production and reception in Drosophila. Science 232: 494-497.
41. Lande, R. 1980. Sexual dimorphism, sexual selection and adaptation in polygenic characters. Evolution 34: 292-305.
42. Lande, R. 1981. Models of speciation by sexual selection on polygenic traits. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 78: 3721-3725.
43. Lewontin, R.C. 1955. The effects of population density and composition on viability in Drosophila melanogaster. Evolution 9: 27-41.
44. Martin, O.Y. & Hosken, D.J. 2003. The evolution of reproductive isolation through sexual conflict. Nature 423: 979-982.
45. McCart, C., Buckling, A. & Ffrench-Constant, R.H. 2005. DDT resistance in flies carries no cost. Curr. Biol. 15: R587-R589.
46. McGuigan, K., Van Homrigh, A. & Blows, M.W. 2008. Genetic analysis of female preference functions as function-valued traits. Am. Nat. 172: 194-202.
47. Mead, L.S. & Arnold, S.J. 2004. Quantitative models of sexual selection. Trends Ecol. Evol. 19: 264-271.
48. Miller, G.T. & Pitnick, S. 2002. Sperm-female coevolution in Drosophila. Science 298: 1230-1233.
49. Moore, A.J. 1989. Sexual selection in Nauphoeta cineria: inherited mating preference. Behav. Genet. 19: 717-724.
50. Murphy, P.A., Giesel, J.T. & Manlove, M.N. 1983. Temperature effects on life history variation in Drosophila simulans. Evolution 37: 1181-1192.
51. Parsons, P.A. 2005. Environments and evolution: interactions between stress, resource inadequacy and energetic efficiency. Biol. Rev. 80: 589-610.
52. Peng, J., Chen, S., Büsser, S., Lui, H., Honegger, T. & Kubli, E. 2005. Gradual release of sperm bound sex-peptide controls female postmating behaviour in Drosophila. Curr. Biol. 15: 207-213.
53. Pitnick, S., Markow, T.A. & Spicer, G. 1995. Delayed maturity is a cost of producing large sperm in Drosophila. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 92: 10614-10618.
54. Radwan, J. 2008. Maintenance of genetic variation in sexual ornaments: a review of mechanisms. Genetica 134: 113-127.
55. Ritchie, M.G., Halsey, E.J. & Gleason, J.M. 1999. Drosophila song as a species-specific mating signal and the behavioural importance of Kyriacou & Hall cycles in D. melanogaster. Anim. Behav. 58: 649-657.
56. Rodríguez, R.L. & Greenfield, M.D. 2003. Genetic variance and phenotypic plasticity in a component of female mate choice in an ultrasonic moth. Evolution 57: 1304-1313.
57. Roff, D.A. & Preziosi, R. 1994. The estimation of the genetic correlation: the use of the jacknife. Heredity 73: 544-548.
58. Schluter, D. 2000. The Ecology of Adaptive Radiation. Oxford University Press, Oxford.
59. Shackleton, M.A., Jennions, M.D. & Hunt, J. 2005. Fighting success and attractiveness as predictors of male mating success in the black field cricket, Teleogryllus commodus: the effectiveness of no-choice tests. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 58: 1-8.
60. Sharma, M.D., Tregenza, T. & Hosken, D.J. 2010. Female mate preferences in Drosophila simulans: evolution and costs. J. Evol. Biol. 23: 1672-1679.
61. Shuster, S.M. & Wade, M.J. 2003. Mating Systems & Strategies. Princeton University Press, Princeton.
62. Simmons, L.W. & Ward, P.I. 1991. The heritability of sexually dimorphic traits in the yellow dung fly Scathophaga stercoraria (L.). J. Evol. Biol. 4: 593-601.
63. Speith, H. 1974. Courtship behaviour in Drosophila. Annu. Rev. Entomol. 19: 385-405.
64. Taylor, M.L., Wedell, N. & Hosken, D.J. 2007. The heritability of attractiveness. Curr. Biol. 17: R959-R960.
65. Taylor, M.L., Wedell, N. & Hosken, D.J. 2008. Sexual selection and female fitness in Drosophila simulans. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 62: 721-728.
66. Taylor, M.L., Sharma, M.D. & Hosken, D.J. 2009. Sexual selection in flies: a comparison of Drosophila simulans and D. melanogaster. Anim. Biol. 59: 391-402.
67. Tomkins, J.L., Radwan, J., Kotiaho, J.S. & Tregenza, T. 2004. Genic capture and resolving the lek paradox. Trends Ecol. Evol. 19: 323-328.
68. Tregenza, T., Simmons, L.W., Wedell, N. & Zuk, M. 2006. Female preference for male courtship song and its role as a signal of immune function and condition. Anim. Behav. 72: 809-818.
69. Via, S. & Lande, R. 1985. Genotype-environment interaction and the evolution of phenotypic plasticity. Evolution 39: 505-522.
70. Wade, M.J. 2000. Epistasis as a genetic constraint within populations and an accelerant of adaptive divergence among them. In: Epistasis and the Evolutionary Process (J.B. Wolf, E.D. Brodie III & M.J. Wade, eds), pp. 213-231. Oxford University Press, Oxford.
71. Watson, M.J.O. & Hoffmann, A.A. 1996. Acclimation, cross-generation effects, and the response to selection for increased cold resistance in Drosophila. Evolution 50: 1182-1192.
72. West-Eberhard, M.J. 1983. Sexual selection, social competition, and speciation. Q. Rev. Biol. 58: 155-183.
73. Widemo, F. & Saether, S.A. 1999. Beauty is in the eye of the beholder: causes and consequences of variation in mating preferences. Trends Ecol. Evol. 14: 26-31.