Temporary worker alienation and job performance: The impact of rating source

Journal of Leadership and Organizational Studies

Volumn 17, Issue 3, 2010, Pages 287-297

  Clark, Sara K ^a   Halbesleben, Jonathon R B ^b   Lester, Scott W ^a   Heintz, Robert ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN EAU CLAIRE   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF ALABAMA   (United States)

Author keywords

Alienation; Performance; Temporary work

Indexed keywords

EID: 78449258513     PISSN: 15480518     EISSN: 19397089     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/1548051810368679     Document Type: Article

References (43)

1. Allison, N.K. (1978). A psychometric development of a test for consumer alienation from the marketplace. Journal of Marketing Research, 15, 565-575.
2. Ashford, S.J., & Black, J.S. (1996). Proactivity during organizational entry: The role of desire for control. Journal of Applied Psychology, 81, 199-214.
3. Barker, K. (1995). Contingent work: Research and the lens of moral exclusion. In L. E. Tetrick & J. Barling (Eds.). Changing employment relations: Behavioral and social perspectives (pp. 31-60). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
4. Boyce, A.S., Ryan, A.M., & Imus, A.L. (2007). Temporary workers, permanent losers? A model of the stigmatization of temporary workers. Journal of Management, 33, 5-29.
5. Bureau of Labor Statistics. (2005a). Temporary help agency workers. Retrieved from http://www.bls.gov/opub/ted/2005/aug/wk1/art02.htm.
6. Bureau of Labor Statistics. (2005b). BLS releases 2004-2014 employment projections. Retrieved from http://www.bls.gov/news.release/History/ecopro_12072005.txt.
7. Cammann, C., Fichman, M., Jenkins, D., & Klesh, J. (1979). The Michigan Organizational Assessment Questionnaire. Unpublished manuscript, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor.
8. Chambel, M.J., & Castanheira, F. (2006). Different temporary work status, different behaviors in organizations. Journal of Business and Psychology, 20, 351-367.
9. Chen, P.Y., Popovich, P.M., & Kogan, M. (1999). Let's talk: Patterns and correlates of social support among temporary employees. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 4, 55-62.
10. Connelly, C.E., & Gallagher, D.G. (2004). Emerging trends in contingent work research. Journal of Management, 30, 959-983.
11. Dean, D.G. (1961). Alienation: Its meaning and its measurement. American Sociological Review, 26, 753-758.
12. Demerouti, E., Bakker, A.B., Vardakou, I., & Kantas, A. (2003). The convergent validity of two burnout instruments: A multitraitmultimethod analysis. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 18, 296-307.
13. DeHart-Davis, L., & Pandey, S.K. (2005). Red tape and public employees: Does perceived rule dysfunction alienate managers? Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 15, 133-148.
14. Gibelman, M. (2005). Social workers for rent: The contingency human services labor force. Families in Society, 86, 457-469.
15. Gioia, D.A., & Longenecker, C.O. (1994). Delving into the dark side: The politics of executive appraisal. Organizational Dynamics, 22, 47-58.
16. Golden, T.D., & Veiga, J.F. (2005). The impact of extent of tele-commuting on job satisfaction: Resolving inconsistent findings. Journal of Management, 31, 301-318.
17. Halbesleben, J.R.B. (2005, November). The experience of alienation among temporary workers in high-skill jobs: A qualitative analysis of temporary firefighters. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the Southern Management Association, Charleston, SC.
18. Halbesleben, J.R.B., & Demerouti, E. (2005). Assessing the construct validity of an alternative measure of burnout: Investigating the Oldenburg Burnout Inventory. Work & Stress, 19, 208-220.
19. Hayashi, Y. (2008, January 7). Growing reliance on temps hold back Japan's rebound; firms increasingly add part-time workers; spending power lags. The Wall Street Journal, p. A1.
20. HR Focus. (2006, January). More contingent workers are a blessing and sometimes a challenge for HR. HR Focus, 83, S1-S2.
21. Jex, S.M., & Gudanowski, D.M. (1992). Efficacy beliefs and work stress: An exploratory study. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 13, 509-517.
22. Judge, T.A., Thoresen, C.J., Bono, J.E., & Patton, G.K. (2001). The job satisfaction-job performance relationship: A qualitative and quantitative review. Psychological Bulletin, 127, 376-407.
23. Kanungo, R.N. (1992). Alienation and empowerment: Some ethical imperatives in business. Journal of Business Ethics, 11, 413-422.
24. Kirsch, M., & Lengermann, J.J. (1972). An empirical test of Robert Blauner's ideas on alienation in work as applied to different types jobs in a white-collar setting. Sociology and Social Research, 56, 180-194.
25. Major, B., Quinton, W.J., McCoy, S.K., & Schmader, T. (2000). Reducing prejudice: The target's perspective. In S. Okasmp (Ed.), Reducing prejudice and discrimination (pp. 211-238). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
26. McCarty, P.A. (1986). Effects of feedback on the self-confidence of men and women. Academy of Management Journal, 29, 840-847.
27. Morrison, E.W. (1993). Newcomer information seeking: exploring types, modes, sources, and outcomes. Academy of Management Journal, 36, 557-589.
28. Plewes, T.J. (1988). Understanding the data on part-time and temporary employment. In K. Christiansen & M. Murphee (Eds), Flexible workstyles: A look at contingent labor (pp. 9-13). Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Labor, Women,s Bureau.s
29. Polivka, A.E., & Nardone, T. (1989). On the definition of contingent work. Monthly Labor Review, 112, 9-16.
30. Postuma, R.A., Campion, M.A., & Varas, A.L. (2005). Predicting counterproductive behaviors among temporary workers: A note. Industrial Relations, 44, 550-554.
31. Redpath, L., Hurst, D., & Devine, K. (2007). Contingent knowledge workers challenges. Human Resource Planning, 30, 33-38.
32. Renn, R.W., & Fedor, D.B. (2001). Development and field test of a feedback seeking, self-efficacy, and goal setting model of work performance. Journal of Management, 27, 563-583.
33. Rogers, J.K. (1995). Just a temp: Experience and structure of alienation in temporary clerical employment. Work and Occupations, 22, 137-166.
34. Seeman, M. (1959). On the meaning of alienation. American Sociological Review, 24, 783-791.
35. Seeman, M. (1975). Alienation studies. Annual Review of Sociology, 1, 91-123.
36. Slater, M.D., Henry, K.L., Swaim, R.C., & Cardador, J.M. (2004). Vulnerable teens, vulnerable times: How sensation seeking, alienation, and victimization moderate the violent media content- aggressiveness relation. Communication Research, 31, 642-668.
37. Smith, R. (2008). Legal protections and advocacy for contingent or casual workers in the United States: A case study in day labor. Social Indicators Research, 88, 197-213.
38. von Hippel, C., Mangum, S.L., Greenberger, D.B., Heneman, R.L., & Skoglind, J.D. (1997). Temporary employment: Can organizations and employees both win? Academy of Management Executive, 11, 93-103.
39. Vosko, L. (2008). Transnational labor regulation: SER-centrism and the risk of exacerbating gendered precariousness. Social Indicators Research, 88, 131-145.
40. Weiss, H.M., & Cropanzano, R. (1996). Affective events theory: A theoretical discussion of the structure, causes, and consequences of affective experiences at work. Research in Organizational Behavior, 18, 1-74.
41. Wheeler, A.R., & Buckley, M.R. (2001). Examining the motivation process of temporary employees: A holistic model and research framework. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 16, 339-354.
42. Wheeler, A.R., Buckley, M.R., & Halbesleben, J.R. (2002). The basics of the contingent workforce. In G. R. Ferris, M. R. Buckley, & D. B. Fedor (Eds.) Human resource management: Perspectives, context, functions, and outcomes (pp. 155-164). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
43. Williams, L.J., & Anderson, S.E. (1991). Job satisfaction and organizational commitment as predictors of organizational citizenship and in-role behaviors. Journal of Management, 17, 601-617.