Effect of monochromatic induced aberrations on visual performance measured by adaptive optics technology

Journal of Refractive Surgery

Volumn 26, Issue 8, 2010, Pages 578-587

  Rouger, Hélène ^a   Benard, Yohann ^a   Legras, Richard ^a  

^a LABORATOIRE AIMÉ COTTON   (France)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; ASTIGMATISM; CASE REPORT; COMA; CONTRAST SENSITIVITY; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; EYE EXAMINATION; HUMAN; IMAGE QUALITY; MODULATION TRANSFER FUNCTION; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PREDICTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PUPIL; VISUAL ACUITY; VISUAL IMPAIRMENT; VISUAL SYSTEM;

ADULT; CONTRAST SENSITIVITY; CORNEAL WAVEFRONT ABERRATION; DIAGNOSTIC TECHNIQUES, OPHTHALMOLOGICAL; HUMANS; OPTICS AND PHOTONICS; REFRACTIVE ERRORS; VISUAL ACUITY; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 78449238914     PISSN: 1081597X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3928/1081597X-20090901-01     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. Applegate RA, Sarver EJ, Khemsara V. Are all aberrations equal? J Refract Surg. 2002;18:S556-S562.
2. Rocha KM, Vabre L, Harms F, Chateau N, Krueger RR. Effects of Zernike wavefront aberrations on visual acuity measured using electromagnetic adaptive optics technology. J Refract Surg. 2007;23:953-959. (Pubitemid 350175126)
3. Fernandez-Sanchez V, Ponce ME, Lara F, Montés-Micó R, Castejón-Mochón JF, López-Gil N. Effect of 3rd-order aberrations on human vision. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2008;34:1339-1344.
4. Marsack JD, Thibos LN, Applegate RA. Metrics of optical quality derived from wave aberrations predict visual performance. J Vis. 2004;4:322-328.
5. Cheng X, Bradley A, Thibos LN. Predicting subjective judgment of best focus with objective image quality metrics. J Vis. 2004;4:310-321.
6. Watson AB, Ahumada AJ Jr. Predicting visual acuity from wavefront aberrations. J Vis. 2008;8:17.1-19.
7. Martin JA, Roorda A. Predicting and assessing visual performance with multizone bifocal contact lenses. Optom Vis Sci. 2003;80:812-819. (Pubitemid 38010099)
8. Legras R, Rouger H. Calculations and measurements of the visual benefit of correcting the higher-order aberrations using adaptive optics technology. Journal of Optometry. 2008;1:22-29.
9. Applegate RA, Marsack JD, Ramos R, Sarver EJ. Interaction between aberrations can improve or reduce visual performance. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2003;29:1487-1495.
10. Legras R, Chateau N, Charman WN. A method for simulation of foveal vision during wear of corrective lenses. Optom Vis Sci. 2004;81:729-738. (Pubitemid 39223728)
11. Fernandez EJ, Vabre L, Hermann B, Unterhuber A, Pavazay B, Drexler W. Adaptive optics with a magnetic deformable mirror: applications in the human eye. Optics Express. 2006;20:8900-8917.
12. Bach M. The "Freiburg Visual Acuity Test" - automatic measurement of visual acuity. Optom Vis Sci. 1996;73:49-53. (Pubitemid 126448912)
13. Lieberman HR, Pentland AP. Microcomputer-based estimation of psychophysical thresholds: the best PEST. Behavior Research Methods & Instrumentation. 1982;14:21-25.
14. Atchison DA, Smith G. Chromatic dispersions of the ocular media of human eyes. J Opt Soc Am A Opt Image Sci Vis. 2005;22:29-37.
15. Thibos LN, Ye M, Zhang X, Bradley A. The chromatic eye: a new reduced-eye model of ocular chromatic aberration in humans. Appl Opt. 1992;31:3594-3600.
16. Rynders M, Lidkea B, Chisholm W, Thibos LN. Statistical distribution of foveal transverse chromatic aberration, pupil centration, and angle psi in a population of young adult eyes. J Opt Soc Am A Opt Image Sci Vis. 1995;12:2348-2357.
17. Applegate RA, Lakshminarayaman V. Parametric representation of Stiles-Crawford functions: normal variation of peak location and directionality. J Opt Soc Am A Opt Image Sci Vis. 1993;10:1611-1623.
18. Granger EM, Cupery KN. An optical merit function (SQF), which correlates with subjective image judgments. Photographic Science and Engineering. 1972;16:221-230.
19. Legras R, Chateau N, Charman WN. Assessment of just-noticeable differences for refractive errors and spherical aberration using visual simulation. Optom Vis Sci. 2004;81:718-728.
20. Legras R, Rouger H. Just-noticeable levels of aberration correction. J Optom. 2008;1:71-77.
21. Chen L, Singer B, Guirao A, Porter J, Williams DR. Image metrics for predicting subjective image quality. Optom Vis Sci. 2005;82:358-369. (Pubitemid 40664332)
22. Thibos LN, Hong X, Bradley A, Applegate RA. Accuracy and precision of objective refraction from wavefront aberrations. J Vis. 2004;4:329-351.
23. Williams DR. Visibility of interference fringes near the resolution limit. J Opt Soc Am A Opt Image Sci Vis. 1985;2:1087-1093.
24. Artal P, Chen L, Fernández EJ, Singer B, Manzanera S, Williams DR. Neural compensation for the eye's optical aberrations. J Vis. 2004;4:281-287. (Pubitemid 39057797)
25. Chen L, Artal P, Gutierrez D, Williams DR. Neural compensation for the best aberration correction. J Vis. 2007;7:1-9.