A method for simulation of foveal vision during wear of corrective lenses

Optometry and Vision Science

Volumn 81, Issue 9, 2004, Pages 729-738

  Legras, Richard ^a   Chateau, Nicolas ^b   Charman, W Neil ^c  

^a UNIVERSITÉ PARIS SACLAY   (France)

^b Imagine Eyes   (France)

^c UNIVERSITY OF MANCHESTER   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Aberrations; Blur; Eye model; Shack Hartmann; Simulation

Indexed keywords

ABERRATIONS; COMPUTER SIMULATION; ERROR ANALYSIS; LENSES; REFRACTIVE INDEX;

FOVEAL VISION; MONOCHROMATIC ABERRATION; VISUAL EFFECTS;

VISION;

ARTICLE; COLOR VISION DEFECT; MATHEMATICAL ANALYSIS; MEASUREMENT; MONOCHROMATIC ABERRATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PUPIL; RETINA FOVEA; RETINA IMAGE; SCORING SYSTEM; SHACK HARTMANN MEASUREMENT; SPECTACLES; VALIDATION PROCESS; VISUAL DISORDER; VISUAL IMPAIRMENT; VISUAL STIMULATION;

ADULT; EYEGLASSES; FIXATION, OCULAR; FOVEA CENTRALIS; HUMANS; MODELS, BIOLOGICAL; PUPIL; VISION;

EID: 4544351467     PISSN: 10405488     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/01.opx.0000144752.18836.1b     Document Type: Article

References (32)

1. Ogle KN, Schwartz JT. Depth of focus of the human eye. J Opt Soc Am 1959;49:273-80.
2. Tucker J, Charman WN. Depth of focus and accommodation for sinusoidal gratings as a function of luminance. Am J Optom Physiol Opt 1986;63:58-70.
3. Plakitsi A, Charman WN. Comparison of the depths of focus with the naked eye and with three types of presbyopic contact lens correction. J Br Contact Lens Assoc 1995;18:119-25.
4. Baude D. Caractérisation, optimisation et réalisation de composants optiques multifocaux diffractifs et réfractifs. PhD thesis. Université de Paris-Sud-France, 1990.
5. Borish IM. Pupil dependency of bifocal contact lenses. Am J Optom Physiol Opt 1988;65:417-23.
6. Erickson P, Robboy M, Apollonio A, Jones WF. Optical design considerations for contact lens bifocals. J Am Optom Assoc 1988;59:198-202.
7. Charman WN, Saunders B. Theoretical and practical factors influencing the optical performance of contact lenses for the presbyope. J Br Contact Lens Assoc 1990;13:67-75.
8. Baude D, Miège C. Presbyopia compensation with contact lenses - a new aspheric progressive lens. J Br Contact Lens Assoc 1992;15:7-15.
9. Birren JE, Casperson RC, Botwinick J. Age changes in pupil size. J Gerontol 1950;5:216-21.
10. Kadlecova V, Peleska M, Vasko A. Dependence on age of the diameter of the pupil in the dark. Nature 1958;182:1520-1.
11. Loewenfeld IE. Pupillary changes related to age. In: Thompson HS, ed. Topics in Neuro-ophthalmology. Baltimore: Williams & Wilkins, 1979:124-50.
12. Thompson HS. The pupil. In: Adler FH, Moses RA, eds. Adler's Physiology of the Eye: Clinical Application. 7th ed. St Louis: Mosby, 1981:326-56.
13. Fernandez EJ, Manzanera S, Piers P, Artal P. Adaptive optics visual simulator. J Refract Surg 2002;18:S634-8.
14. Lyons K, Mouroulis P, Cheng D. Effect of instrumental spherical aberration on visual image quality. J Opt Soc Am (A) 1996;8:193-205.
15. Giles MK. Aberration tolerances for visual optical systems. J Opt Soc Am 1977;67:634-43.
16. Burton GJ, Haig ND. Effects of the Seidel aberrations on visual target discrimination. J Opt Soc Am (A) 1984;1:373-85.
17. Haig ND, Burton GJ. Effects of wavefront aberration on visual instrument performance, and a consequential test technique. Appl Optics 1987;26:492-500.
18. Peli E, Lang A. Appearance of images through a multifocal intraocular lens. J Opt Soc Am (A) 2001;18:302-9.
19. Applegate RA, Sarver EJ, Khemsara V. Are all aberrations equal? J Refract Surg 2002;18:5556-62.
20. Applegate RA, Ballentine C, Gross H, Sarver EJ, Sarver CA. Visual acuity as a function of Zernike mode and level of root mean square error. Optom Vis Sci 2003;80:97-105.
21. Applegate RA, Marsack JD, Ramos R, Sarver EJ. Interaction between aberrations to improve or reduce visual performance. J Cataract Refract Surg 2003;29:1487-95.
22. Mouroulis P, Zhang HP. Visual instrument image quality metrics and the effects of coma and astigmatism. J Opt Soc Am (A) 1992;9:34-42.
23. Mouroulis P, Woo GC. Chromatic aberration and accommodation in visual instruments. Optik (Stuttgart) 1988;80:161-6.
24. Mouroulis P, Lyons KP, Zhao G. Aberration balancing in the design of visually coupled lens systems. In: Fischer RE, Smith WJ, eds. Proceedings of SPIE Volume: 2000. Current Developments in Optical Design and Optical Engineering III. Bellingham, WA: SPIE Press, 1993:15-27.
25. Sekiguchi N, Williams DR, Brainard DH. Efficiency in detection of isoluminant and isochromatic interference fringes. J Opt Soc Am A 1993;10:2118-33.
26. Van Meeteren A. Calculations on the optical modulation transfer function of the human eye for white light. Optica Acta 1974;21:395-412.
27. Chateau N, Baude D. Simulated in situ optical performance of bifocal contact lenses. Optom Vis Sci 1997;74:532-9.
28. Thibos LN, Ye M, Zhang XX, Bradley A. The chromatic eye: a new reduced-eye model of ocular chromatic aberration in humans. Appl Optics 1992;31:3594-600.
29. Rynders M, Lidkea B, Chisholm W, Thibos LN. Statistical distribution of foveal transverse chromatic aberration, pupil centration, and angle psi in a population of young adult eyes. J Opt Soc Am (A) 1995;12:2348-57.
30. Porter J, Guirao A, Cox IG, Williams DR. Monochromatic aberrations of the human eye in a large population. J Opt Soc Am (A) 2001;18:1793-803.
31. Applegate RA, Lakshminarayanan V. Parametric representation of Stiles-Crawford functions: normal variation of peak location and directionality. J Opt Soc Am (A) 1993;10:1611-23.
32. Bland JM, Altman DG. Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. Lancet 1986;1:307-10.