Predicting visual acuity from wavefront aberrations

Journal of Vision

Volumn 8, Issue 4, 2008, Pages

  Watson, Andrew B ^a   Ahumada Jr , Albert J ^a  

^a NASA AMES RESEARCH CENTER   (United States)

Author keywords

Autorefraction; Letter identification; Pattern recognition; Sloan letters; Zemike polynomials

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; COMPARATIVE STUDY; EYE REFRACTION; HUMAN; PATHOPHYSIOLOGY; PHYSIOLOGY; PROGNOSIS; REFRACTION ERROR; STATISTICAL MODEL; VISUAL ACUITY;

HUMANS; MODELS, STATISTICAL; PROGNOSIS; REFRACTION, OCULAR; REFRACTIVE ERRORS; VISUAL ACUITY;

EID: 42549169348     PISSN: None     EISSN: 15347362     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1167/8.4.17     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. American National Standards Institute (ANSI). (2004). American national standard for ophthalmics - Methods for reporting optical aberrations of eyes (vol. ANSI Z80.28). Washington, D. C.
2. Applegate, R. A., Marsack, J. D., Ramos, R., & Sarver, E. J. (2003). Interaction between aberrations to improve or reduce visual performance. Journal of Cataract and Refractive Surgery, 29, 1487-1495.
3. Artal, P. (1990). Calculations of two-dimensional foveal retinal images in real eyes. Journal of the Optical Society of America A, Optics and Image Science, 7, 1374-1381.
4. Artal, P., Guirao, A., Berrio, E., & Williams, D. R. (2001). Compensation of corneal aberrations by the internal optics in the human eye. Journal of Vision, 1(1): 1, 1-8, http://journalofvision.org/ 1/1/1/, doi:10.1167/1.1.1.
5. Bouma, H. (1971). Visual recognition of isolated lower-case letters. Vision Research, 11, 459-474.
6. Campbell, F. W., & Green, D. G. (1965). Optical and retinal factors affecting visual resolution. Journal of Physiology, 181, 576-593.
7. Cheng, H., Barnett, J. K., Vilupuru, A. S., Marsack, J. D., Kasthurirangan, S., Applegate, R. A., et al. (2004). A population study on changes in wave aberrations with accommodation. Journal of Vision, 4(4):3, 272-280, http://journalofvision.org/4/4/3/, doi:10.1167/ 4.4.3.
8. Cheng, X., Bradley, A., & Thibos, L. N. (2004). Predicting subjective judgment of best focus with objective, image quality metrics. Journal of Vision, 4(4):7, 310-321, http://journalofvision.org/4/4/7/, doi:10.1167/4.4.71
9. Cheng, X., Himebaugh, N. L., Kollbaum, P. S., Thibos, L. N., & Bradley, A. (2004). Test-retest reliability of clinical Shack-Hartmann measurements. Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science, 45, 351-360.
10. Duda, R. O.; & Hart, P. E. (1973). Pattern classification and scene analysis. New York: John Wiley.
11. Gervais,, M. J., Harvey, L. O., Jr., & Roberts, J. O. (1984). Identification confusions among letters of the alphabet. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 10, 655-666.
12. Gibson, E. J., Osser, H., Schiff, W., & Smith, J. (1963). An analysis of critical features of letters, tested by a confusion matrix. In A basic program on reading (Cooperative Research Program No. 639). Office of Education.
13. Guirao, A., & Williams, D. R. (2003). A method to predict refractive errors from wave aberration data. Optometry and Vision Science, 80, 36-42.
14. IJspeert, J. K., van den Berg, T. J., & Spekreijse, H. (1993). An improved mathematical description of the foveal visual point spread function with parameters for age, pupil size and pigmentation. Vision Research, 33, 15-20.
15. Marsack, J. D., Thibos, L. N., & Applegate, R. A. (2004). Metrics of optical quality derived from wave aberrations predict visual performance. Journal of Vision, 4(4):8, 322-328, http://journalofvision.org/4/4/8/, doi:10.1167/4.4.8.
16. McIlhagga, W., & Pääkkönen, A. (1999). Noisy templates explain area summation. Vision Research, 39, 367-372.
17. Nestares, O., Navarro, R., & Antona, B. (2003). Bayesian model of Snellen visual acuity. Journal of the Optical Society of America A, Optics, Image Science, and Vision, 20, 1371-1381.
18. Parish, D. H., & Sperling, G. (1991). Object spatial frequencies, retinal spatial frequencies, noise, and the efficiency of letter discrimination, Vision Research, 31, 1399-1415.
19. Pelli, D. G., Palomares, M., & Majaj, N. J. (2004). Crowding is unlike ordinary masking: Distinguishing feature integration from detection. Journal of Vision, 4(12):12, 1136-1169, http://journalofvision.org/4/12/12/, doi:10.1167/4.12.12.
20. Roorda, A., & Williams, D. R. (1999). The arrangement of the three cone classes in the living human eye. Nature, 397, 520-522.
21. Solomon, J. A., & Pelli, D. G. (1994). The visual filter mediating letter identification. Nature, 369, 395-397.
22. Thibos, L. N., Applegate, R. A., Schwiegerling, J. T., & Webb, R. (2002). Standards for reporting the optical aberrations of eyes. Journal of Refractive Surgery, 18, S652-S660.
23. Thibos, L. N., Hong, X., Bradley, A., & Applegate, R. A. (2004). Accuracy and precision of objective refraction from wavefront aberrations. Journal of Vision, 4(4):9, 329-351, http://journalofvision.org/4/4/9/, doi:10.1167/4.4.9.
24. Thibos, L. N., Hong, X., Bradley, A., & Cheng, X. (2002). Statistical variation of aberration structure and image quality in a normal population of healthy eyes. Journal of the Optical Society of America A, Optics, Image Science, and Vision, 19, 2329-2348.
25. Watson, A. B., & Ahumada, A. J., Jr. (2005). A standard model for foveal detection of spatial contrast. Journal of Vision, 5(9):6, 717-740, http://journalofvision.org/5/9/6/, doi:10.1167/5.9.6.
26. Watson, A. B., & Fitzhugh, A. E. (1989). Modelling character legibility. Society for Information Display Digest of Technical Papers, 20, 360-363.
27. Watson, A. B., & Pelli, D. G. (1983). QUEST: A Bayesian adaptive psychometric method. Perception & Psychophysics, 33, 113-120.
28. Watson, A. B., & Solomon, J. A. (1997). Psychophysica: Mathematica notebooks for psychophysical experiments. Spatial Vision, 10, 447-466.
29. Wolfram, S. (2003). The mathematica book (5th ed.). Champaign, IL: Wolfram Media.