Predicting revision risk for aseptic loosening of femoral components in total hip arthroplasty in individual patients - A finite element study

Journal of Orthopaedic Research

Volumn 25, Issue 6, 2007, Pages 779-788

  Lennon, Alexander B ^a   Britton, John R ^a   MacNiocaill, Ruairi F ^b   Byrne, Damien P ^a   Kenny, Patrick J ^b   Prendergast, Patrick J ^a  

^a TRINITY COLLEGE DUBLIN   (Ireland)

^b CAPPAGH NATIONAL ORTHOPAEDIC HOSPITAL   (Ireland)

Author keywords

Finite element; Patient specific; Revision risk; THA

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGE; AGED; ARTICLE; CLINICAL ARTICLE; FATIGUE; FEMALE; FEMUR; FINITE ELEMENT ANALYSIS; HUMAN; MALE; POSTOPERATIVE PERIOD; PREDICTION; PREOPERATIVE PERIOD; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROCESS OPTIMIZATION; PROSTHESIS FAILURE; PROSTHESIS LOOSENING; SIMULATION; STATISTICAL MODEL; SURGEON; SURGICAL RISK; SURGICAL TECHNIQUE; TOTAL HIP PROSTHESIS; TREATMENT PLANNING; WALKING; WEIGHT BEARING;

ADULT; AGED; ARTHROPLASTY, REPLACEMENT, HIP; COMPUTER SIMULATION; DATABASES, FACTUAL; FEMALE; FEMUR; FINITE ELEMENT ANALYSIS; HIP JOINT; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; MODELS, BIOLOGICAL; PREDICTIVE VALUE OF TESTS; PREOPERATIVE CARE; PROSTHESIS FAILURE; RISK FACTORS; WEIGHT-BEARING;

EID: 34249675073     PISSN: 07360266     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/jor.20346     Document Type: Article

References (34)

1. Huiskes R, Chao EYS. 1983. A survey of finite element analysis in orthopaedic biomechanies: the first decade. J Biomech 16:385-409.
2. Prendergast PJ. 1997. Finite element models in tissue mechanics and orthopaedic implant design. Clin Biomech 12:343-366.
3. Stolk J, Maher SA, Verdonschot N, et al. 2003. Can finite element models detect clinically inferior cemented hip implants? Clin Orthop 409:138-150.
4. Perillo-Marcone A, Ryd L, Johnsson K, et al. 2004. A combined RSA and FE study of the implanted proximal tibia: correlation of the post-operative mechanical environment with implant migration. J Biomech 37:1205-1213.
5. Kerner J, Huiskes R, van Lenthe G, et al. 1999. Correlation between pre-operative periprosthetic bone density and post-operative bone loss in TRA can be explained by strain-adaptive remodelling. J Biomech 32:695-703.
6. Viceconti M, Brusi G, Pancanti A, et al. 2006. Primary stability of an anatomical cementless hip stem: a statistical analysis. J Biomech 39:1169-1179.
7. Schmitt J, Meiforth J, Lengsfeld M. 2001. Development of a hybrid finite element model for individual simulation of intertrochanteric osteotomies. Med Eng Phys 23:529-539.
8. Luboz V, Ambard D, Swider P, et al. 2005. Computer assisted planning and orbital surgery: patient-related prediction of osteotomy size in proptosis reduction. Clin Biomech 20:900-905.
9. Herberts P, Malchau H, Garellick G. 2003. Annual report 2003. The Swedish National Hip Arthroplasty Register. Technical report, Department of Orthopaedsics, Sahlgrenska University Hospital; URL http://wwwjru.orthop.-gu.se/
10. Jasty M, Maloney WJ, Bragdon CR, et al. 1991. The initiation of failure in cemented femoral components of hip arthroplasties. J Bone Joint Surg [Br] 73-B:551-558.
11. Topoleski LDT, Ducheyne P, Cuckler JM. 1993. Micro-structural pathway of fracture in poly(methyl methacrylate) bone cement. Biomaterials 14:1165-1172.
12. Harrigan TP, Harris WH. 1991. A three-dimensional non-linear finite element study of the effect of cement-prosthesis debonding in cemented femoral total hip components. J Biomech 24:1047-1058.
13. Verdonschot N, Huiskes R. 1997. Cement debonding process of total hip arthroplasty stems. Chn Orthop Relat Res 336:297-307.
14. Pérez MA, García JM, Doblar6 M. 2005. Analysis of the debonding of the stem-cement interface in intramedullary fixation using a non-linear fracture mechanics approach. Eng Fracture Mech 72:1125-1147.
15. Verdonschot N, Huiskes R. 1997. The effects of cementstem debonding in THA on the long-term failure probability of cement. J Biomech 30:795-802.
16. Stolk J, Verdonschot N, Murphy BP, et al. 2003. Finite element simulation of anisotropic damage accumulation and creep in acrylic bone cement. Eng Fracture Mech 71: 513-528.
17. Lennon AB, Prendergast PJ. 2004. Modelling damage growth and failure in elastic materials with random defect distributions. Mathematical Proceedings of the Royal Irish Academy 104A:155-171. URL http://www.ria.ie
18. The B, Diercks RL, van Ooijen PMA, et al. 2005. Comparison of analog and digital preoperative planning in total hip and knee arthroplasties. Acta Orthop 76:78-84.
19. Reilly DT, Burstein AH. 1975. The elastic and ultimate roperties of compact bone tissue. J Biomech 8:393-405.
20. Huiskes R, Verdonschot N. 1997. Biomechanics of artificial joints: the hip. In: Mow VC, Hayes WC, editors. Basic orthopaedic biomechanics, 2nd ed. Philadelphia: Lippin-cott-Raven; p 395-460.
21. Mann KA, Bartel DL, Wright TM, et al. 1991. Mechanical characteristics of the stem-cement interface. J Orthop Res 9:798-808.
22. Heller MO, Bergmann G, Kassi JP, et al. 2005. Determination of muscle loading at the hip joint for use in pre-clinical testing. J Biomech 38:1155-1163.
23. Goldsmith AAJ, Dowson D, Wroblewski BM, et al. 2001. Comparative study of the activity of total hip arthroplasty patients and normal subjects. J Arthroplasty 16:613-619.
24. Stolk J, Verdonschot N, Huiskes R. 2002. Stair climbing is more detrimental to the cement in hip replacement than walking. Clin Orthop Relat Res 405:294-305.
25. Kärrholm J, Borssen B, Löwenhielm G, et al. 1994. Does early micromotion of femoral stem prostheses matter? 4-7 year stereoradiographic follow-up of 84 cemented prostheses. J Bone Joint Surg [Br] 76-B:912-917.
26. Alfaro-Adrián J, Gill HS, Murray DW. 2001. Should total hip arthroplasty femoral components be designed to sub-side? A radiostereometric analysis study of the Charnley Elite and Exeter stems. J Arthroplasty 16:598-606.
27. Walker PS, Mai SF, Cobb AG, et al. 1995. Prediction of clinical outcome of THR from migration measurements on standard radiographs - a study of cemented Charnley and Stanmore femoral stems. J Bone Joint Surg [Br] 77-B:705-714.
28. Britton JR, Prendergast PJ. 2005. Preclinical. testing of femoral hip components: an experimental investigation with four prostheses. J Biomech Eng 127:872-880.
29. Lennon AB, McCormack BAO, Prendergast PJ. 2003. The relationship between cement fatigue damage and implant surface finish in proximal femoral prostheses. Med Eng Phys 25:833-841.
30. Gill HS, Alfaro-Adrián J, Alfaro-Adriiin C, et al. 2002. The effect of anteversion on femoral component stability assessed by radiostereometric analysis. J Arthroplasty 17:997-1005.
31. Huiskes R, Verdonschot N, Nivbrant B. 1998. Migration, stem shape, and surface finish in cemented total hip arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 355:103-112.
32. Münger P, Röder C, Ackermann-Liebrich U, et al. 2006. Patient-related risk factors leading to aseptic loosening in total hip arthroplasty. A case study of 5,035 patients. Acta Orthopaed 77:567-574.
33. Zioupos P, Currey JD. 1998. Changes in the stiffness, strength, and toughness of human cortical bone with age. Bone 22:57-66.
34. Morgan EF, Bayraktar HH, Keaveny TM. 2003. Trabecular bone modulus-density relationships depend on anatomic site. J Biomech 36:897-904.