Patient-reported outcomes measurement information system (PROMIS) domain names and definitions revisions: Further evaluation of content validity in IRT-derived item banks

Quality of Life Research

Volumn 19, Issue 9, 2010, Pages 1311-1321

  Riley, William T ^e   Rothrock, Nan ^a   Bruce, Bonnie ^b   Christodolou, Christopher ^c   Cook, Karon ^d   Hahn, Elizabeth A ^a   Cella, David ^a  

^a NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b STANFORD UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c STONY BROOK UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^d UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON   (United States)

^e NONE

Author keywords

Conceptual framework; Content validity; Domain definition; Item response theory

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; ARTICLE; CHILD; DATA BASE; FEMALE; HUMAN; INFORMATION SYSTEM; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; ORGANIZATION AND MANAGEMENT; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PRESCHOOL CHILD; PSYCHOMETRY; QUALITY OF LIFE; QUESTIONNAIRE; SELF DISCLOSURE; VALIDATION STUDY;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; CHILD; CHILD, PRESCHOOL; DATABASES AS TOPIC; FEMALE; HUMANS; INFORMATION SYSTEMS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT (HEALTH CARE); PSYCHOMETRICS; QUALITY OF LIFE; QUESTIONNAIRES; SELF DISCLOSURE; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 78349308646     PISSN: 09629343     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s11136-010-9694-5     Document Type: Article

References (18)

1. K Lohr For the Scientific Advisory Committee of the Medical Outcomes Trust 2002 Assessing health status and quality-of-life instruments: Attributes and review criteria Quality of Life Research 11 193 205 10.1023/A:1015291021312
2. ML Rothman P Beltran JC Cappelleri J Lipscomb B Teschendorf The Mayo/FDA Patient-Reported Outcomes Consensus Meeting Group 2007 Patient-reported outcomes: Conceptual issues Value in Health 10 Suppl. 2 S66 S75 10.1111/j.1524-4733.2007.00269.x 17995476
3. US Department of Health and Human Services. (2006). Food and drug administration. Guidance for industry. Patient-reported outcome measures: Use in medical product development to support labeling claims. Rockville, MD: US Department of Health and Human Services. http://www.fda.gov/downloads/Drugs/ GuidanceComplianceRegulatoryInformation/Guidances/ucm071975.pdf.
4. M Rothman L Burke P Erickson N Kline Leidy DL Patrick CD Petrie 2009 Use of existing patient-reported outcome (PRO) instruments and their modification: The ISPOR good research practices for evaluation and documenting content validity for the use of existing instruments and their modification PRO task force report Value in Health 8 1075 1083 10.1111/j.1524-4733.2009.00603.x
5. M Brod LE Tesler TL Christensen 2009 Qualitative research and content validity: Developing best practices based on science and experience Quality of Life Research 18 1263 1278 10.1007/s11136-009-9540-9 19784865
6. JF Fries B Bruce D Cella 2005 The promise of PROMIS: The new sciences behind patient-reported outcomes Clinical and Experimental Rheumatology 23 S53 S57 1:STN:280:DC%2BD2MrpsV2ktA%3D%3D 16273785
7. D Cella S Yount N Rothrock R Gershon K Cook B Reeve, et al. 2007 The patient-reported outcomes measurement information system (PROMIS). Progress of an NIH Roadmap cooperative during its first two years Medical Care 45 Suppl. 1 S3 S11 10.1097/01.mlr.0000258615.42478.55 17443116
8. DA DeWalt N Rothrock S Yount AA Stone 2007 Evaluation of item candidates: The PROMIS qualitative item review Medical Care 45 Suppl. 1 S12 S21 10.1097/01.mlr.0000254567.79743.e2 17443114
9. LD Castel KA Williams HB Bosworth SV Eisen EA Hahn DE Irwin, et al. 2008 Content validity in the PROMIS social health domain: a qualitative analysis of focus group data Quality of Life Research 17 737 749 10.1007/s11136-008-9352-3 18478368
10. C Christodoulou DU Junghaenel DA DeWalt N Rothrock AA Stone 2008 Cognitive interviewing in the evaluation of fatigue items: Results from the patient-reported outcomes measurement information system (PROMIS) Quality of Life Research 17 1239 1246 10.1007/s11136-008-9402-x 18850327
11. BB Reeve RD Hays JB Bjorner KF Cook PK Crane JA Teresi, et al. 2007 Psychometric evaluation and calibration of health-related quality of life item banks: Plans for the patient-reported outcomes measurement information system (PROMIS) Medical Care 45 Suppl. 1 S22 S31 10.1097/01.mlr.0000250483.85507.04 17443115
12. Amtmann, D., Cook, K. F., Jensena, M. P., Chen, W.-H., Choi, S., Revicki, D., et al. (2010). Development of a PROMIS item bank to measure pain interference. Pain, 150(1), 173-182.
13. Cella, D., Riley, W., Stone, A. A., Rothrock, N., Reeve, B. B., Yount, S., et al. (in press). Initial item banks and first wave testing of the Patient Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) network: 2005-2008. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology.
14. Embretson, S. E., & Reise, S. P. (2000). Item response theory for psychologists. Mahway, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
15. RD Hays JB Bjorner DA Revicki KL Spritzer D Cella 2009 Development of physical and mental health summary scores from the patient-reported outcomes measurement information system (PROMIS) global items Quality of Life Research 18 873 880 10.1007/s11136-009-9496-9 19543809
16. American Psychiatric Association. (1994). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (4th ed.). Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Association.
17. MH Frost BB Reeve AM Liepa JW Stauffer RD Hays The Mayo/FDA Patient-Reported Outcomes Consensus Meeting Group 2007 What is sufficient evidence for the reliability and validity of patient-reported outcome measures Value in Health 10 Suppl. 2 S94 S105 10.1111/j.1524-4733.2007.00272.x 17995479
18. Watson, D. (2005). Rethinking the mood and anxiety disorders: A quantitative hierarchical model for DSM-V. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 114, 522-536.