Content validity in the PROMIS social-health domain: A qualitative analysis of focus-group data

Quality of Life Research

Volumn 17, Issue 5, 2008, Pages 737-749

  Castel, Liana D ^a   Williams, Kelly A ^a   Bosworth, Hayden B ^b   Eisen, Susan V ^c   Hahn, Elizabeth A ^d,e   Irwin, Debra E ^f   Kelly, Morgen A R ^g   Morse, Jennifer ^g   Stover, Angela ^g   DeWalt, Darren A ^a,h   DeVellis, Robert F ^f  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA   (United States)

^b DUKE UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

^c BOSTON UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF PUBLIC HEALTH   (United States)

^d EVANSTON NORTHWESTERN HEALTHCARE   (United States)

^e NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^f IL   (United States)

^g UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH   (United States)

^h UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

Author keywords

Epidemiologic measurements; Focus groups; Outcome assessment (health care); Qualitative research; Quality of life

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTHRITIS; ARTICLE; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CONCEPTUAL FRAMEWORK; CONTENT VALIDITY; CONTROLLED STUDY; DAILY LIFE ACTIVITY; DEPRESSION; DIABETES MELLITUS; FAMILY; FEMALE; FRIEND; HEART DISEASE; HUMAN; INFORMATION PROCESSING; LEISURE; MALE; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PATIENT SATISFACTION; PERFORMANCE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PUBLIC HEALTH SERVICE; QUALITATIVE ANALYSIS; QUALITY OF LIFE; RESPONSIBILITY; WORK;

ADOLESCENT; CHILD; CHRONIC DISEASE; FEMALE; FOCUS GROUPS; HEALTH STATUS; HUMANS; MALE; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT (HEALTH CARE); QUALITY OF LIFE; QUESTIONNAIRES; SOCIAL ADJUSTMENT;

EID: 49949151818     PISSN: 09629343     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s11136-008-9352-3     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. Food and Drug Administration. (2006). Guidance for industry: Patient-reported outcome measures: use in medical product development to support labeling claims (DRAFT). US Department of Health and Human Services Food and Drug Administration; Center for Drug Evaluation and Research (CDER); Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research (CBER); Center for Devices and Radiological Health (CDRH), February 2006. Available from: http://www.fda.gov/CDER/GUIDANCE/ 5460dft.pdf. Accessed December 18, 2007.
2. Cella, D., Yount, S., et al. (2007). The patient-reported outcomes measurement information system (PROMIS): Progress of an NIH roadmap cooperative group during its first two years. Medical Care, 45(5 Suppl 1), S3-S11.
3. DeWalt, D. A., Rothrock, N., et al. (2007). Evaluation of item candidates: The PROMIS qualitative item review. Medical Care, 45(5 Suppl 1), S12-S21.
4. World Health Organization. (1946). Constitution of the World Health Organization. Geneva: World Health Organization.
5. World Health Organization. (2001). ICF: International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health. Geneva: World Health Organization.
6. Reeve, B. B., Hays, R. D., et al. (2007). Psychometric evaluation and calibration of health-related quality of life item banks: Plans for the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS). Medical Care, 45(5 Suppl 1), S22-S31.
7. Birchwood, M., Smith, J., et al. (1990). The Social functioning scale. The development and validation of a new scale of social adjustment for use in family intervention programmes with schizophrenic patients. The British Journal of Psychiatry, 157, 853-859.
8. Dijkers, M. P., Whiteneck, G., et al. (2000). Measures of social outcomes in disability research. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 81(12 Suppl 2), S63-S80.
9. Eisen, S. V., Normand, S. L. T., et al. (1994). BASIS-32 and the Revised Behavioral Symptom Identification Scale (BASIS-R). In M. Maruish (Ed.), The use of psychological testing for treatment planning and outcome assessment (pp. 759-790). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
10. Horowitz, L. M., Rosenberg, S. E., et al. (1988). Inventory of interpersonal problems: psychometric properties and clinical applications. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 56(6), 885-892.
11. Weissman, M. M., & Bothwell, S. (1976). Assessment of social adjustment by patient self-report. Archives of General Psychiatry, 33(9), 1111-1115.
12. World Health Organization. (2000). Disability Assessment Schedule II (WHO DAS II) Interviewer's training manual. Geneva.
13. McDowell, I., & Newell, C. (1996). Measuring health: A guide to rating scales and questionnaires (2nd ed.). New York: Oxford University Press.
14. Cohen, S., & Syme, S. L. (1985). Issues in the study, application of social support. In S. Cohen & S. L. Syme (Eds.), Social support and health (pp. 3-22). Orlando, FL: Academic Press, Inc.
15. McCampbell, C., & Helmer, O. (1993). An experimental application of the Delphi method to the use of experts. Management Science, 9(3), 458-467.
16. Hahn, E., Cella, D., et al. (1991). Social well-being: The forgotten health status measure. Quality of Life Research, 14(9).
17. Curtis, E., & Redmond, R. (2007). Focus groups in nursing research. Nurse Res, 14(2), 25-37.
18. Krueger, R. (1994). Focus groups: A practical guide for applied research (2nd ed). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
19. Morgan, D. (1988). Focus groups as qualitative research. Qualitative research methods (Vol 16). Newbury Park: Sage.
20. Morgan, D. (Ed.). (1993). Successful focus groups: advancing the state of the art. Newbury Park: Sage.
21. Stewart, D., Shamdasani, P., et al. (2007). Focus groups: Theory and practice. Thousand Oaks: Sage.
22. Kitzinger, J. (1995). Qualitative research. Introducing focus groups. BMJ, 311(7000), 299-302.
23. Bender, D., & Ewbank, D. (1994). The focus group as a tool for health research: Issues in design and analysis. Health Transition Review, 4(1), 63-79.
24. Muhr, T. (2004). User's manual for ATLAS.ti 5.0. GmbH, Berlin: ATLAS.ti Scientific Software Development.
25. Carey, J. W., Morgan, M., et al. (1996). Intercoder agreement in analysis of responses to open-ended interview questions: Examples from tuberculosis research. Field Methods, 8(3), 1-5.
26. Gorden, R. L. (1992). Basic interviewing skills. Long Grove: Waveland Press.
27. Kupper, L. L., & Hafner, K. B. (1989). On assessing interrater agreement for multiple attribute responses. Biometrics, 45(3), 957-967.
28. Herrald, M. M., Herrald, M. M., et al. (2002). Pet ownership predicts adherence to cardiovascular rehabilitation. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 32(6), 1107-1123.
29. Frost, M. H., Reeve, B. B., et al. (2007). What is sufficient evidence for the reliability and validity of patient-reported outcome measures? Value Health, 10 (Suppl 2), S94-S105.
30. Ustun, T., Chatterji, S., et al. (Eds.). (2001). Disability and culture: Universalism and diversity. Gottingen: World Health Organization.