Aesthetic and functional results after breast conserving surgery as correlates of quality of life measured by a German version of the Breast Cancer Treatment Outcome Scale (BCTOS)

Breast

Volumn 19, Issue 6, 2010, Pages 470-474

  Heil, Joerg ^a   Holl, Simone ^a   Golatta, Michael ^a   Rauch, Geraldine ^a   Rom, Joachim ^a   Marmé, Frederik ^a   Gebauer, Gerhard ^a,b   Sohn, Christof ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF HEIDELBERG   (Germany)

^b Frauenklinik   (Germany)

Author keywords

Breast Neoplasms, psychology; Breast Neoplasms, surgery; Quality of Life

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; BODY IMAGE; BREAST CANCER; BREAST CANCER TREATMENT OUTCOME SCALE; CANCER SURGERY; COGNITION; COHORT ANALYSIS; CORRELATION ANALYSIS; FEMALE; FUNCTIONAL ASSESSMENT; HUMAN; LANGUAGE; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MASTECTOMY; MULTIPLE REGRESSION; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; POSTMENOPAUSE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; QUALITY OF LIFE; QUESTIONNAIRE; RATING SCALE; SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS; VALIDITY;

EID: 78349308140     PISSN: 09609776     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.breast.2010.05.004     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. Sneeuw K.C., Aaronson N.K., Yarnold J.R., Broderick M., Regan J., Ross G., et al. Cosmetic and functional outcomes of breast conserving treatment for early stage breast cancer. 2. Relationship with psychosocial functioning. Radiother Oncol 1992, 25:160-166.
2. Krishnan L., Stanton A.L., Collins C.A., Liston V.E., Jewell W.R. Form or function? Part 2. Objective cosmetic and functional correlates of quality of life in women treated with breast-conserving surgical procedures and radiotherapy. Cancer 2001, 91:2282-2287.
3. Stanton A.L., Krishnan L., Collins C.A. Form or function? Part 1. Subjective cosmetic and functional correlates of quality of life in women treated with breast-conserving surgical procedures and radiotherapy. Cancer 2001, 91:2273-2281.
4. Nano M.T., Gill P.G., Kollias J., Bochner M.A., Malycha P., Winefield H.R. Psychological impact and cosmetic outcome of surgical breast cancer strategies. ANZ J Surg 2005, 75:940-947.
5. Wang H.T., Barone C.M., Steigelman M.B., Kahlenberg M., Rousseau D., Berger J., et al. Aesthetic outcomes in breast conservation therapy. Aesthet Surg J 2008, 28:165-170.
6. Curran D., van Dongen J.P., Aaronson N.K., Kiebert G., Fentiman I.S., Mignolet F., et al. Quality of life of early-stage breast cancer patients treated with radical mastectomy or breast-conserving procedures: results of EORTC Trial 10801. The European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC), Breast Cancer Co-operative Group (BCCG). Eur J Cancer 1998, 34:307-314.
7. Kiebert G.M., de Haes J.C., van de Velde C.J. The impact of breast-conserving treatment and mastectomy on the quality of life of early-stage breast cancer patients: a review. J Clin Oncol 1991, 9:1059-1070.
8. Noguchi M., Saito Y., Nishijima H., Koyanagi M., Nonomura A., Mizukami Y., et al. The psychological and cosmetic aspects of breast conserving therapy compared with radical mastectomy. Surg Today 1993, 23:598-602.
9. Erickson V.S., Pearson M.L., Ganz P.A., Adams J., Kahn K.L. Arm edema in breast cancer patients. J Natl Cancer Inst 2001, 93:96-111.
10. Maunsell E., Brisson J., Deschenes L. Arm problems and psychological distress after surgery for breast cancer. Can J Surg 1993, 36:315-320.
11. Sakorafas G.H., Peros G., Cataliotti L., Vlastos G. Lymphedema following axillary lymph node dissection for breast cancer. Surg Oncol 2006, 15:153-165.
12. Velanovich V., Szymanski W. Quality of life of breast cancer patients with lymphedema. Am J Surg 1999, 177:184-187. [discussion 188].
13. Woods M., Tobin M., Mortimer P. The psychosocial morbidity of breast cancer patients with lymphoedema. Cancer Nurs 1995, 18:467-471.
14. Anders Husted M., Karen H., Jan S., Susanne B., Esbern F., Helle H., et al. Arm morbidity following sentinel lymph node biopsy or axillary lymph node dissection: a study from the Danish Breast Cancer Cooperative Group. Breast (Edinburgh, Scotland) 2008, 17:138-147.
15. Chao-qian L., Yan G., Jun-yi S., Yuan S. Late morbidity associated with a tumour-negative sentinel lymph node biopsy in primary breast cancer patients: a systematic review. Eur J Cancer (Oxford, England: 1990) 2009, 45:1560-1568.
16. Vic V., Wanda S. Quality of life of breast cancer patients with lymphedema. Am J Surg 1999, 177:184-188.
17. William E.B., Scott T.H., Emmanuel E.Z., Karen L.H., Lisa C.K., Donn C.Y. Sentinel lymph node biopsy results in less postoperative morbidity compared with axillary lymph node dissection for breast cancer. Am J Surg 2002, 183:23-27.
18. Arenas M., Sabater S., Hernandez V., Henriquez I., Ameijide A., Anglada L., et al. Cosmetic outcome of breast conservative treatment for early stage breast cancer. Clin Transl Oncol 2006, 8:334-338.
19. Vrieling C., Collette L., Fourquet A., Hoogenraad W.J., Horiot J.C., Jager J.J., et al. The influence of the boost in breast-conserving therapy on cosmetic outcome in the EORTC " boost versus no boost" trial. EORTC Radiotherapy and Breast Cancer Cooperative Groups. European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 1999, 45:677-685.
20. Waljee J.F., Hu E.S., Ubel P.A., Smith D.M., Newman L.A., Alderman A.K. Effect of esthetic outcome after breast-conserving surgery on psychosocial functioning and quality of life. J Clin Oncol 2008, 26:3331-3337.
21. Cardoso M.J., Cardoso J., Amaral N., Azevedo I., Barreau L., Bernardo M., et al. Turning subjective into objective: the BCCT. core software for evaluation of cosmetic results in breast cancer conservative treatment. Breast 2007.
22. Clarke D., Martinez A., Cox R.S. Analysis of cosmetic results and complications in patients with stage I and II breast cancer treated by biopsy and irradiation. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 1983, 9:1807-1813.
23. Al-Ghazal S.K., Fallowfield L., Blamey R.W. Patient evaluation of cosmetic outcome after conserving surgery for treatment of primary breast cancer. Eur J Surg Oncol 1999, 25:344-346.
24. Taylor M.E., Perez C.A., Halverson K.J., Kuske R.R., Philpott G.W., Garcia D.M., et al. Factors influencing cosmetic results after conservation therapy for breast cancer. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 1995, 31:753-764.
25. Cull A., Sprangers M., Bjordal K., Aaronson N., West K., Bottomley A. EORTC quality of life group translation procedure 2002, Group EQoL (Ed.).
26. Aaronson N.K., Ahmedzai S., Bergman B., Bullinger M., Cull A., Duez N.J., et al. The European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer QLQ-C30: a quality-of-life instrument for use in international clinical trials in oncology. J Natl Cancer Inst 1993, 85:365-376.
27. Sprangers M.A., Groenvold M., Arraras J.I., Franklin J., te Velde A., Muller M., et al. The European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer breast cancer-specific quality-of-life questionnaire module: first results from a three-country field study. J Clin Oncol 1996, 14:2756-2768.
28. Waldmann A., Pritzkuleit R., Raspe H., Katalinic A. The OVIS study: health related quality of life measured by the EORTC QLQ-C30 and -BR23 in German female patients with breast cancer from Schleswig-Holstein. Qual Life Res 2007, 16:767-776.
29. Fayers P.M.A.N., Bjordal K., Groenvold M., Curran D., Bottomley A., on behalf of the EORTC Quality of Life Group The EORTC QLQ-C30 scoring Manual 2001, European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer, Brussels. 3rd ed.