Psychological impact and cosmetic outcome of surgical breast cancer strategies

ANZ Journal of Surgery

Volumn 75, Issue 11, 2005, Pages 940-947

  Nano, Maria Teresa ^a,b   Gill, Peter Grantley ^a,b   Kollias, James ^a,b   Bochner, Melissa Anne ^b   Malycha, Peter ^b   Winefield, Helen R ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ADELAIDE   (Australia)

^b ROYAL ADELAIDE HOSPITAL   (Australia)

Author keywords

Breast cancer; Breast cancer reconstruction; Breast conservation; Mastectomy; Quality of life

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; AUSTRALIA; BODY IMAGE; BREAST CANCER; BREAST RECONSTRUCTION; BREAST SURGERY; ESTHETICS; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; FUNCTIONAL ASSESSMENT; HUMAN; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MASTECTOMY; PATIENT SATISFACTION; PSYCHOLOGICAL ASPECT; QUALITY OF LIFE; QUESTIONNAIRE; SCORING SYSTEM; SELF EVALUATION; SURGICAL TECHNIQUE; TREATMENT OUTCOME; BREAST TUMOR; COMPARATIVE STUDY; INTERVIEW; MIDDLE AGED; PHOTOGRAPHY; SEGMENTAL MASTECTOMY;

ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; BODY IMAGE; BREAST NEOPLASMS; FEMALE; HUMANS; INTERVIEWS; MAMMAPLASTY; MASTECTOMY; MASTECTOMY, SEGMENTAL; MIDDLE AGED; PATIENT SATISFACTION; PHOTOGRAPHY; QUALITY OF LIFE; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 33644874965     PISSN: 14451433     EISSN: 14452197     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1445-2197.2005.03517.x     Document Type: Article

References (47)

1. South Australian Cancer Registry Publications. Epidemiology of Cancer in South Australia - Incidence, Mortality and Survival 1977-1999 - Twenty Three Years of Data. Adelaide : South Australian Government, 2000.
2. Hill DK Jamrozik K White V. Surgical Management of Breast Cancer in Australia in 1995. Woolloomooloo : NHMRC National Breast Cancer Centre, 1999.
3. Williams P Rankin N Redman S et al. A National Consumer Survey of the Perceptions of Care of Women with Breast Cancer. Canberra : National Breast Cancer Centre in press).
4. Sandelin K King E Redman S. Breast reconstruction following mastectomy: current status in Australia. ANZ. J. Surg. 2003 73 : 701 6.
5. Al-Ghazal SK Fallowfield L Blamey RW. Comparison of psychological aspects and patient satisfaction following breast conserving surgery, simple mastectomy and breast reconstruction. Eur. J. Cancer 2000 36 : 1938 43.
6. Moyer A. Psychosocial outcomes of breast-conserving surgery versus mastectomy: a meta-analytic review. Health Psychol. 1997 16 : 284 98.
7. Pusic A Thompson TA Kerrigan CL et al. Surgical options for the early-stage breast cancer: factors associated with patient choice and postoperative quality of life. Plast. Reconstr. Surg. 1999 104 : 1325 33.
8. Curran D van Dongen JP Aaronson NK et al. Quality of life of early-stage breast cancer patients treated with radical mastectomy or breast-conserving procedures: results of EORTC trial 10801. The European Organization for Research and Treatment Cancer (EORTC), Breast Cancer Co-operative Group (BCCG). Eur. J. Cancer 1998 34 : 307 14.
9. de Haes JC van Oostrom MA Welvaart K. The effect of radical and conserving surgery on the quality of life of early breast cancer patients. Eur. J. Surg. Oncol. 1986 12 : 337 42.
10. Arora NK Gustafson DH Hawkins RP et al. Impact of surgery and chemotherapy on the quality of life of younger women with breast carcinoma: a prospective study. Cancer 2001 92 : 1288 98.
11. Fallowfield LJ. Psychosocial adjustment after treatment for early breast cancer. Oncology (Huntingt) 1990 4 : 89 97, (discussion) 97 8, 100.
12. Fallowfield LJ Hall A. Psychosocial and sexual impact of diagnosis and treatment of breast cancer. Br. Med. Bull. 1991 47 : 388 99.
13. Fung KW Lau Y Fielding R Or A Yip AW. The impact of mastectomy, breast-conserving treatment and immediate breast reconstruction on the quality of life of Chinese women. ANZ. J. Surg. 2001 71 : 202 6.
14. Ganz PA Schag AC Lee JJ Polinsky ML Tan SJ. Breast conservation versus mastectomy. Is there a difference in psychological adjustment or quality of life in the year after surgery? Cancer 1992 69 : 1729 38.
15. Irwig L Bennetts A. Quality of life after breast conservation or mastectomy: a systematic review. Aust. NZ. J. Surg. 1997 67 : 750 4.
16. Janni W Rjosk D Dimpfl TH, et al. Quality of life influenced by primary surgical treatment for stage I-III breast cancer - long-term follow-up of a matched-pair analysis. Ann. Surg. Oncol. 2001 8 : 542 8.
17. Kiebert GM de Haes JC van de Velde CJ. The impact of breast-conserving treatment and mastectomy on the quality of life of early-stage breast cancer patients: a review. J. Clin. Oncol. 1991 9 : 1059 70.
18. Noguchi M Kitagawa H Kinoshita K et al. Psychologic and cosmetic self-assessments of breast conserving therapy compared with mastectomy and immediate breast reconstruction. JSurg. Oncol. 1993 54 : 260 6.
19. Noguchi M Saito Y Nishijima H et al. The psychological and cosmetic aspects of breast conserving therapy compared with radical mastectomy. Surg. Today 1993 23 : 598 602.
20. Poulsen B Graversen HP Beckmann J Blichert-Toft M. A comparative study of postoperative psychosocial function in women with primary operable breast cancer randomized to breast conservation therapy or mastectomy. Eur. J. Surg. Oncol. 1997 23 : 327 34.
21. Rowland JH Desmond KA Meyerowitz BE Belin TR Wyatt GE Ganz PA. Role of breast reconstructive surgery in physical and emotional outcomes among breast cancer survivors. J. Natl Cancer Inst. 2000 92 : 1422 9.
22. Keith DJ Walker MB Walker LG et al. Women who wish breast reconstruction: characteristics, fears, and hopes. Plast. Reconstr. Surg. 2003 111 : 1051 6, (discussion) 1057 9.
23. Rowland JH Holland JC Chaglassian T Kinne D. Psychological response to breast reconstruction. Expectations for and impact on postmastectomy functioning. Psychosomatics 1993 34 : 241 50.
24. Wilkins EG Cederna PS Lowery JC et al. Prospective analysis of psychosocial outcomes in breast reconstruction: one-year postoperative results from the Michigan Breast Reconstruction Outcome Study. Plast. Reconstr. Surg. 2000 106 : 1014 25, (discussion) 1026 7.
25. Brandberg Y Malm M Blomqvist L. A prospective and randomized study, 'SVEA', comparing effects of three methods for delayed breast reconstruction on quality of life, patient-defined problem areas of life, and cosmetic result. Plast. Reconstr. Surg. 2000 105 : 66 74, (discussion) 75 6.
26. Al-Ghazal SK Sully L Fallowfield L Blamey RW. The psychological impact of immediate rather than delayed breast reconstruction. Eur. J. Surg. Oncol. 2000 26 : 17 19.
27. Nissen MJ Swenson KK Ritz LJ Farrell JB Sladek ML Lally RM. Quality of life after breast carcinoma surgery: a comparison of three surgical procedures. Cancer 2001 91 : 1238 46.
28. Harcourt DM Rumsey NJ Ambler NR et al. The psychological effect of mastectomy with or without breast reconstruction: a prospective, multicenter study. Plast. Reconstr. Surg. 2003 111 : 1060 8.
29. Yurek D Farrar W Andersen BL. Breast cancer surgery: comparing surgical groups and determining individual differences in postoperative sexuality and body change stress. J. Consult. Clin. Psychol. 2000 68 : 697 709.
30. Brady MJ Cella DF Mo F et al. Reliability and validity of the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Breast quality-of-life instrument. J. Clin. Oncol. 1997 15 : 974 86.
31. Nano MT Gill PG Kollias J Bochner MA. Breast volume replacement using the latissimus dorsi miniflap - The Royal Adelaide Hospital Experience. ANZ J. Surg. 2004 74 : 98 104.
32. Gill PG Kollias J Carter ML Malycha P Coventry BJ et al. Evolution of breast surgery on a specialist unit: five year audit. ANZ J. Surg. 2000 70 : A20.
33. Wenzel LB Fairclough DL Brady MJ et al. Age-related differences in the quality of life of breast carcinoma patients after treatment. Cancer 1999 86 : 1768 74.
34. Goldberg P Stolzman M Goldberg HM. Psychological considerations in breast reconstruction. Ann. Plast. Surg. 1984 13 : 38 43.
35. Alderman AK Wilkins EG Lowery JC Kim M Davis JA. Determinants of patient satisfaction in postmastectomy breast reconstruction. Plast. Reconstr. Surg. 2000 106 : 769 76.
36. Veiga DF Neto MS Garcia EB et al. Evaluations of the aesthetic results and patient satisfaction with the late pedicled TRAM flap breast reconstruction. Ann. Plast. Surg. 2002 48 : 515 20.
37. Park AJ Chetty U Watson AC. Patient satisfaction following insertion of silicone breast implants. Br. J. Plast. Surg. 1996 49 : 515 18.
38. Berrino P Campora E Santi P. Postquadrantectomy breast deformities: classification and techniques of surgical correction. Plast. Reconstr. Surg. 1987 79 : 567 72.
39. Clough KB Cuminet J Fitoussi A Nos C Mosseri V. Cosmetic sequelae after conservative treatment for breast cancer: classification and results of surgical correction. Ann. Plast. Surg. 1998 41 : 471 81.
40. D'Aniello C Grimaldi L Barbato A Bosi B Carli A. Cosmetic results in 242 patients treated by conservative surgery for breast cancer. Scand. J. Plast. Reconstr. Surg. Hand Surg. 1999 33 419 22.
41. Dewar JA Benhamou S Benhamou E et al. Cosmetic results following lumpectomy, axillary dissection and radiotherapy for small breast cancers. Radiother. Oncol. 1988 12 : 273 80.
42. Johansen J Overgaard J Rose C et al. Cosmetic outcome and breast morbidity in breast-conserving treatment - results from the Danish DBCG-82TM national randomized trial in breast cancer. Acta Oncol. 2002 41 : 369 80.
43. Olivotto IA Rose MA Osteen RT et al. Late cosmetic outcome after conservative surgery and radiotherapy: analysis of causes of cosmetic failure. Int. J. Radiat. Oncol. Biol. Phys. 1989 17 : 747 53.
44. Noguchi M Tsugawa K Taniya T Miwa K. The outcome of patients with breast cancer who underwent breast conserving treatment with or without immediate volume replacement with autogenous tissue. Breast Cancer 1999 6 : 43 50.
45. Panieri E Lazarus D Dent DM Hudson DA Murray E Werner ID. A study of the patient factors affecting reconstruction after mastectomy for breast carcinoma. Am. Surg. 2003 69 : 95 7.
46. Rowland JH Dioso J Holland JC Chaglassian T Kinne D. Breast reconstruction after mastectomy: who seeks it, who refuses? Plast. Reconstr. Surg. 1995 95 : 812 22, (discussion) 823.
47. Reaby LL. Reasons why women who have mastectomy decide to have or not to have breast reconstruction. Plast. Reconstr. Surg. 1998 101 : 1810 18.