Machine perfusion versus cold storage for the preservation of kidneys donated after cardiac death: A multicenter, randomized, controlled trial

Annals of Surgery

Volumn 252, Issue 5, 2010, Pages 756-762

  Jochmans, Ina ^a   Moers, Cyril ^b   Smits, Jacqueline M ^c   Leuvenink, Henri G D ^b   Treckmann, Jürgen ^d   Paul, Andreas ^d   Rahmel, Axel ^c   Squifflet, Jean Paul ^e   Van Heurn, Ernest ^f   Monbaliu, Diethard ^a   Ploeg, Rutger J ^b   Pirenne, Jacques ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY HOSPITALS LEUVEN   (Belgium)

^b UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER GRONINGEN   (Netherlands)

^c EUROTRANSPLANT INTERNATIONAL FOUNDATION   (Netherlands)

^d UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL ESSEN   (Germany)

^e UNIVERSITY OF LIÈGE   (Belgium)

^f MAASTRICHT UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGED; CLINICAL TRIAL; CONFERENCE PAPER; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; CREATININE CLEARANCE; CRYOPRESERVATION; DELAYED GRAFT FUNCTION; DIALYSIS; GRAFT SURVIVAL; HEART DEATH; HUMAN; HYPOTHERMIC MACHINE PERFUSION; INCIDENCE; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; KIDNEY DONOR; KIDNEY PERFUSION; KIDNEY PRESERVATION; KIDNEY TRANSPLANTATION; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; TREATMENT DURATION; CARDIOVASCULAR DISEASE; CLINICAL ARTICLE; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; GASTROINTESTINAL DISEASE; GRAFT RECIPIENT; INFECTION COMPLICATION; KIDNEY DONATED AFTER CARDIAC DEATH; MALE; METABOLIC DISORDER; URINARY TRACT DISEASE;

CRYOPRESERVATION; DELAYED GRAFT FUNCTION; GRAFT SURVIVAL; HUMANS; KIDNEY; KIDNEY FUNCTION TESTS; KIDNEY TRANSPLANTATION; LOGISTIC MODELS; ORGAN PRESERVATION; PERFUSION; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES;

EID: 78349293444     PISSN: 00034932     EISSN: 15281140     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e3181ffc256     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (33)

1. Perico N, Cattaneo D, Sayegh MH, et al. Delayed graft function in kidney transplantation. Lancet. 2004;364:1814-1827.
2. Yarlagadda SG, Coca SG, Formica RN Jr, et al. Association between delayed graft function and allograft and patient survival: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2009;24:1039-1047.
3. Halloran PF, Hunsicker LG. Delayed graft function: state of the art, November 10-11, 2000. Summitmeeting, Scottsdale, Arizona, USA. Am J Transplant. 2001;1:115-120.
4. Kauffman HM, McBride MA, Cors CS, et al. Early mortality rates in older kidney recipients with comorbid risk factors. Transplantation. 2007;83:404-410.
5. Rosenthal JT, Danovitch GM, Wilkinson A, et al. The high cost ofdelayed graft function in cadaveric renal transplantation. Transplantation. 1991;51:1115-1118.
6. Hagenmeyer EG, Haussler B, Hempel E, et al. Resource use andtreatmentcosts after kidney transplantation: impact of demographic factors, comorbidities, andcomplications. Transplantation. 2004;77:1545-1550.
7. Kootstra G, van Heurn E. Non-heartbeating donation ofkidneys for transplan-tation. Nat Clin Pract Nephrol. 2007;3:154-163.
8. Daemen JW, Oomen AP, Kelders WP, et al. The potential pool of non-heart-beatingkidneydonors. Clin Transplant. 1997;11:149-154.
9. Moers C, Leuvenink HG, Ploeg RJ. Non-heart beating organ donation: overview and future perspectives. Transpl Int. 2007;20:567-575.
10. Kokkinos C, Antcliffe D, Nanidis T, et al. Outcome of kidney transplantation from nonheart-beating versus heart-beating cadaveric donors. Transplantation. 2007;83:1193-1199.
11. Plata-Munoz JJ, Muthusamy A, Quiroga I, et al. Impact ofpulsatile perfusion on postoperative outcome of kidneys from controlled donors after cardiac death. Transpl Int. 2008;21:899-907.
12. Moustafellos P, Hadjianastassiou V, Roy D, et al. The influence ofpulsatile preservation in kidney transplantation from non-heart-beating donors. Transplant Proc. 2007;39:1323-1325.
13. St Peter SD, Imber CJ, Friend PJ. Liver and kidney preservation by perfusion. Lancet. 2002;359:604-613.
14. van der Vliet JA, Kievit JK, Hene RJ, et al. Preservation of non-heart-beating donor kidneys: a clinical prospective randomised case-control study ofma-chineperfusionversuscoldstorage. Transplant Proc. 2001;33:847.
15. Opelz G, Terasaki PI. Advantage ofcold storage over machine perfusion for preservationofcadaverkidneys. Transplantation. 1982;33:64-68.
16. Wight J, Chilcott J, Holmes M, et al. The clinical and cost-effectiveness of pulsatile machine perfusion versus cold storage of kidneys for transplantation retrieved from heart-beating and non-heart-beating donors. Health Technol Assess. 2003;7:1-94.
17. Moers C, Smits JM, Maathuis MH, et al. Machine perfusion or cold storage in deceased-donor kidney transplantation. N Engl J Med. 2009;360:7-19
18. Eurotransplant. http://www.eurotransplant.nl. Accessed August 19, 2009.
19. Belzer FO, Glass NR, Sollinger HW, et al. A new perfusate for kidney preser-vation. Transplantation. 1982;33:322-323.
20. Boom H, Paul L, de Fijter J. Delayed graft function in renal transplantation. Transplant Rev. 2004;18:139-152.
21. Hsieh FY, Bloch DA, Larsen MD. Asimplemethodofsample size calculation for linear and logistic regression. Stat Med. 1998;17:1623-1634.
22. McLaren AJ, Jassem W, Gray DW, et al. Delayed graft function: risk factors and the relative effects ofearly function and acute rejection on long-term survival in cadaveric renal transplantation. Clin Transplant. 1999;13:266-272.
23. Troppmann C, Gillingham KJ, Benedetti E, et al. Delayed graft function, acute rejection, and outcome after cadaver renal transplantation. The multivariate analysis. Transplantation. 1995;59:962-968.
24. Ojo AO, Wolfe RA, Held PJ, et al. Delayed graft function: risk factors and implications for renal allograft survival. Transplantation. 1997;63:968-974.
25. Brook NR, Waller JR, Nicholson ML. Nonheart-beating kidney donation: current practice and future developments. Kidney Int. 2003;63:1516-1529.
26. Rowinski W, Walaszewski J, Lagiewska B, et al. Use of kidneys from marginal and non-heart-beating donors: warm ischemia per se is not the most detrimental factor. Transplant Proc. 1993;25:1511-1512.
27. Barklin A. Systemic inflammation in the brain-dead organ donor. Acta Anaes-thesiol Scand. 2009;53:425-435.
28. Daemen JH, de Vries B, Kootstra G. The effect ofmachine perfusion preser-vation on early function of non-heart-beating donor kidneys. Transplant Proc. 1997;29:3489.
29. Watson CJE, Wells AC, Roberts RJ, et al. Cold machine perfusion versus static cold storage of kidneys donated after cardiac death: a UK multicenter randomizedcontrolledtrial. Am J Transplant. 2010;10:1991-1999.
30. Clarke A, Rosen R. Length of stay How short should hospital care be? Eur J Public Health. 2001;11:166-170.
31. Morgan M, Beech R. Variations in lengths ofstay and rates ofday case surgery: implications for the efficiency of surgical management. J Epidemiol Community Health. 1990;44:90-105.
32. Stewart ZA, Lonze BE, Warren DS, et al. Histidine-tryptophan- ketoglutarate (HTK) is associated with reduced graft survival of deceased donor kidney transplants. Am J Transplant. 2009;9:1048-1054.
33. Metzger RA, Delmonico FL, Feng S, et al. Expanded criteria donors for kidney transplantation. Am J Transplant. 2003;3:114-125.