The Influence of Pulsatile Preservation in Kidney Transplantation From Non-Heart-Beating Donors

Transplantation Proceedings

Volumn 39, Issue 5, 2007, Pages 1323-1325

  Moustafellos, P ^a   Hadjianastassiou, V ^a   Roy, D ^a   Muktadir, A ^a   Contractor, H ^a   Vaidya, A ^a   Friend, P J ^a  

^a OXFORD UNIVERSITY HOSPITALS NHS FOUNDATION TRUST   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; CADAVER; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; HOSPITALIZATION; HUMAN; HYPOTHERMIA; KIDNEY GRAFT; KIDNEY PERFUSION; KIDNEY PRESERVATION; KIDNEY TRANSPLANTATION; MALE; POSTOPERATIVE PERIOD; PRIORITY JOURNAL;

ADULT; AGED; CREATININE; FEMALE; HEART ARREST; HISTOCOMPATIBILITY TESTING; HUMANS; HYPOTHERMIA; KIDNEY TRANSPLANTATION; LENGTH OF STAY; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; ORGAN PRESERVATION; PULSATILE FLOW; PULSE; TISSUE DONORS;

EID: 34250187708     PISSN: 00411345     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.transproceed.2006.11.026     Document Type: Article

References (11)

1. Halloran P., and Aprile M. A randomized prospective trial of cold storage versus pulsatile perfusion for cadaver kidney preservation. Transplantation 43 (1987) 827
2. Polyak M.M., Arrington B.O., Stubenbord W.T., et al. The influence of pulsatile preservation on renal transplantation in the 1990s. Transplantation 69 (2000) 249
3. Rosenthal J.T., Danovitch G.M., Wilkinson A., et al. The high cost of delayed graft function in cadaveric renal transplantation. Transplantation 51 (1991) 1115
4. Heil J., Sutherland D., Fryd D.S., et al. Acute tubular necrosis of cadaver renal allografts do not correlate with organ sharing or preservation time but portends a poorer prognosis for long-term graft survival. Transplant Proc 16 (1984) 270
5. Sellers M.T., Gallichio M.H., Hudson S.L., et al. Improved outcomes in cadaveric renal allografts with pulsatile preservation. Clin Transplantation 14 (2000) 543
6. Barber W.H., Deierhoi M.H., Phillips M.G., et al. Preservation by pulsatile perfusion improves early renal allograft function. Transplant Proc 20 (1988) 865
7. Heil J.E., Canafax D.M., Sutherland D.E.R., et al. A controlled comparison of kidney preservation by two methods: machine perfusion and cold storage. Transplant Proc 19 (1987) 2046
8. Kosieradzki M., Danielewicz R., Kwiatkowski A., et al. Rejection rate and incidence of acute tubular necrosis after pulsatile perfusion preservation. Transplant Proc 31 (1999) 278
9. Burdick J.F., Rosendale J.D., McBride M.A., et al. National impact of pulsatile perfusion on cadaveric kidney transplantation. Transplantation 64 (1997) 1730
10. Rosenthal J.T., Danovitch G.M., Wilkinson A., et al. The high cost of delayed graft function in cadaveric renal transplantation. Transplantation 51 (1991) 1115
11. Light J.A., Gage F., Kowalski A.E., et al. Immediate function and cost comparison between static and pulsatile preservation in kidney recipients. Clin Transplant 10 (1996) 233