Learning design and assessment with e-tivities

British Journal of Educational Technology

Volumn 41, Issue 6, 2010, Pages 922-935

  Armellini, Alejandro ^a   Aiyegbayo, Olaojo ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF LEICESTER   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF BRISTOL   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ACADEMIC COURSE; ASSESSMENT PRACTICES; BRITISH UNIVERSITY; COGNITIVE MAPPING; COURSE DELIVERY; E-LEARNING DESIGN; FORMATIVE ASSESSMENT; LEARNING DESIGNS; NEW DESIGN; ONLINE LEARNING; RESEARCH METHODOLOGIES; WEB 2.0;

DESIGN; E-LEARNING; LEARNING SYSTEMS; TEACHING;

CURRICULA;

EID: 78349274499     PISSN: 00071013     EISSN: 14678535     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-8535.2009.01013.x     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. Ackerman, F., Eden, C., &, Cropper, S., (1992). Getting started with cognitive mapping: tutorial notes. Strathclyde: Strategic Decision Support Research Unit, Strathclyde University. Retrieved November 18, 2008, from
2. Armellini, A., &, Jones, S., (2008). Carpe Diem: seizing each day to foster change in e-learning design. Reflecting Education, 4, 1, 17-29. Retrieved September 27, 2008, from
3. Armellini, A., Jones, S., &, Salmon, G., (2007). Developing assessment for learning through e-tivities. Proceedings of the 11th International Computer-Assisted Assessment Conference (pp. 13-17). Loughborough, UK: Loughborough University.
4. Beetham, H., &, Sharpe, R., (Eds) (2007). Rethinking pedagogy for a digital age. Abingdon: Routledge.
5. Biggs, J., (2003). Teaching for quality learning at university. Buckingham: Open University Press.
6. Black, P., &, Wiliam, D., (1998). Inside the black box: raising standards through classroom assessment. London: King's College London, School of Education.
7. Brown, S., &, Knight, P., (1994). Assessing learners in higher education. London: Kogan Page.
8. Conole, G., &, Fill, K., (2005). A learning design toolkit to create pedagogically effective learning activities. Journal of Interactive Media in Education, Special Issue, In, Colin Tattersall, and, Rob Koper, (Eds), 1-16. Available at (last accessed 3 August 2009).
9. Conole, G., &, Oliver, M., (2006). Contemporary perspectives in e-learning research. London: Routledge.
10. Conole, G., Dyke, M., Oliver, M., &, Seale, J., (2004). Mapping pedagogy and tools for effective learning design. Computers & Education, 43, 1-2, 17-33.
11. Eden, C., (2004). Analyzing cognitive maps to help structure issues or problems. European Journal of Operational Research, 159, 673-686.
12. Gibbs, G., (2006). How assessment frames student learning. In, C. Bryan, &, K. Clegg, (Eds), Innovative assessment in higher education (pp. 23-36). London: Routledge.
13. Kelly, G. A., (1955). The psychology of personal constructs. New York: Norton.
14. Nicol, D., (2006). Rethinking technology-supported assessment practices in relation to the seven principles of good feedback practice. In, C. Bryan, &, K. Clegg, (Eds), Innovative assessment in higher education (pp. 64-77). London: Routledge.
15. Nicol, D., (2007). E-assessment by design: using multiple-choice tests to good effect. Journal of Further and Higher Education, 31, 1, 53-64.
16. Nicol, D., &, Macfarlane-Dick, D., (2006). Formative assessment and self-regulated learning: a model and seven principles of good feedback practice. Studies in Higher Education, 34, 2, 199-218.
17. Ramsden, P., (1992). Learning to teach in higher education. London: Routledge.
18. Russell, C., (2009). A systemic framework for managing e-learning adoption in campus universities: individual strategies in context. ALT-J, 17, 1, 3-19.
19. Salmon, G., (2002). E-tivities: the key to active online learning. London: Taylor & Francis.
20. Salmon, G., (2004). E-moderating: the key to teaching and learning online (2nd ed.). New York: RoutledgeFalmer.
21. Salmon, G., Jones, S., &, Armellini, A., (2008). Building institutional capability in e-learning design. ALT-J, 16, 2, 95-109.
22. San Diego, J., Laurillard, D., Boyle, T., Bradley, C., Ljubojevic, D., Neumann, T., etal (2008). Towards a user-oriented analytical approach to learning design. ALT-J, 16, 1, 15-29.
23. Yorke, M., (2003). Formative assessment in higher education: moves towards theory and the enhancement of pedagogic practice. Higher Education, 45, 477-501.