Binary sparse coding

Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics)

Volumn 6365 LNCS, Issue , 2010, Pages 450-457

  Henniges, Marc ^a   Puertas, Gervasio ^a   Bornschein, Jörg ^a   Eggert, Julian ^b   Lücke, Jörg ^a  

^a GOETHE UNIVERSITY   (Germany)

^b HONDA RESEARCH INSTITUTE EUROPE GMBH   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CODES (SYMBOLS); EQUIVALENCE CLASSES; FUNCTIONS; MAXIMUM LIKELIHOOD ESTIMATION;

BASIS FUNCTIONS; EFFICIENT ESTIMATION; GENERATIVE MODEL; MAXIMUM LIKELIHOOD PARAMETER ESTIMATIONS; MODEL PARAMETERS; NUMERICAL EXPERIMENTS; POSTERIOR DISTRIBUTIONS; RECEPTIVE FIELDS;

LEARNING ALGORITHMS;

EID: 78349273171     PISSN: 03029743     EISSN: 16113349     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-15995-4_56     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (17)

1. Comon, P.: Independent Component Analysis, a new concept? Signal Process 36(3), 287-314 (1994)
2. Olshausen, B., Field, D.: Emergence of simple-cell receptive field properties by learning a sparse code for natural images. Nature 381, 607-609 (1996)
3. Olshausen, B., Millman, K.: Learning sparse codes with a mixture-of-Gaussians prior. In: Proc NIPS, vol. 12, pp. 841-847 (2000)
4. Ringach, D.L.: Spatial Structure and Symmetry of Simple-Cell Receptive Fields in Macaque Primary Visual Cortex. J. Neurophysiol. 88, 455-463 (2002)
5. Neal, R., Hinton, G.: A view of the EM algorithm that justifies incremental, sparse, and other variants. In: Learning in Graphical Models, pp. 355-369 (1998)
6. Lücke, J., Eggert, J.: Expectation Truncation And the Benefits of Preselection in Training Generative Models. J. Mach Learn Res., revision in review (2010)
7. Lücke, J., Sahani, M.: Maximal causes for non-linear component extraction. J. Mach. Learn. Res. 9, 1227-1267 (2008)
8. Lücke, J., Turner, R., Sahani, M., Henniges, M.: Occlusive Components Analysis. In: Proc NIPS, vol. 22, pp. 1069-1077 (2009)
9. Hoyer, P.: Non-negative sparse coding. In: Neural Networks for Signal Processing XII: Proceedings of the IEEE Workshop, pp. 557-565 (2002)
10. Hateren, J., Schaaf, A.: Independent Component Filters of Natural Images Compared with Simple Cells in Primary Visual Cortex. Proc. Biol. Sci. 265(1394), 359-366 (1998)
11. Lücke, J.: Receptive Field Self-Organization in a Model of the Fine Structure in V1 Cortical Columns. Neural Computation (2009)
12. Berkes, P., Turner, R., Sahani, M.: On sparsity and overcompleteness in image models. In: Proc NIPS, vol. 20 (2008)
13. Hinton, G., Ghahramani, Z.: Generative models for discovering sparse distributed representations. Phil. Trans. R Soc. B 352(1358), 1177 (1997)
14. Harpur, G., Prager, R.: Development of low entropy coding in a recurrent network. Network-Comp. Neural. 7, 277-284 (1996)
15. Haft, M., Hofman, R., Tresp, V.: Generative binary codes. Pattern Anal. Appl. 6(4), 269-284 (2004)
16. Lücke, J., Sahani, M.: Generalized softmax networks for non-linear component extraction. In: de Sá, J.M., Alexandre, L.A., Duch, W., Mandic, D.P. (eds.) ICANN 2007. LNCS, vol. 4668, pp. 657-667. Springer, Heidelberg (2007)
17. Rehn, M., Sommer, F.T.: A network that uses few active neurones to code visual input predicts the diverse shapes of cortical receptive fields. J. Comput. Neurosci. 22(2), 135-146 (2007)