Preference Reversal in Multiattribute Choice

Psychological Review

Volumn 117, Issue 4, 2010, Pages 1275-1291

  Tsetsos, Konstantinos ^a   Usher, Marius ^b,c   Chater, Nick ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY COLLEGE LONDON   (United Kingdom)

^b TEL AVIV UNIVERSITY   (Israel)

^c UNIVERSITY OF LONDON   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Computational modes; Decision making; Decoy effects; Dynamic models; Loss aversion

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; BIOLOGICAL MODEL; DECISION MAKING; HUMAN; PHYSIOLOGY; PSYCHOLOGICAL MODEL;

CHOICE BEHAVIOR; DECISION MAKING; HUMANS; JUDGMENT; MODELS, NEUROLOGICAL; MODELS, PSYCHOLOGICAL;

EID: 78249286835     PISSN: 0033295X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1037/a0020580     Document Type: Article

References (37)

1. Blavatskyy P.R. Stochastic expected utility theory. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty 2007, 34:259-286.
2. Bogacz R., Usher M., Zhang J., McClelland J.L. Extending a biologically inspired model of choice: Multi-alternatives, nonlinearity and value-based multidimensional choice. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society, Series B: Biological Sciences 2007, 362:1655-1670.
3. Busemeyer J.R., Johnson J.G. Computational models of decision making. Blackwell handbook of judgment and decision making 2004, 133-154. Blackwell Publishing, Oxford, England. D.J. Koehler, N. Harvey (Eds.).
4. Busemeyer J.R., Townsend J.T., Diederich A., Barkan R. Contrast effects or loss aversion? Comment on Usher and McClelland (2004). Psychological Review 2005, 112:253-255.
5. Choplin J.M., Hummel J.E. Comparison-induced decoy effects. Memory & Cognition 2005, 33:332-343.
6. Debreu G. Review of R. D. Luce, Individual Choice Behavior: A Theoretical Analysis. American Economic Review 1960, 50:186-188.
7. Dhar R., Glazer R. Similarity in context: Cognitive representation and violation of preference and perceptual invariance in consumer choice. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 1996, 67:280-293.
8. Diederich A. Dynamic stochastic models for decision making under time constraints. Journal of Mathematical Psychology 1997, 41:260-274.
9. Glöckner A., Betsch T. Modeling option and strategy choices with connectionist networks: Towards an integrative model of automatic and deliberate decision making. Judgment and Decision Making 2008, 3:215-228.
10. Guo F.Y., Holyoak K.J. Understanding similarity in choice behavior: A connectionist model. Proceedings of the Twenty-Fourth Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society 2002, 393-398. Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ. W. Gray, C. Schunn (Eds.).
11. Holyoak K.J., Simon D. Bidirectional reasoning in decision making by constraint satisfaction. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 1999, 128:3-31.
12. Huber J., Payne J.W., Puto C. Adding asymmetrically dominated alternatives: Violations of regularity and the similarity hypothesis. Journal of Consumer Research 1982, 9:90-98.
13. Hurly T.A., Oseen M.D. Context-dependent, risk-sensitive foraging preferences in wild rufous hummingbirds. Animal Behaviour 1999, 58:59-66.
14. Kahneman D., Tversky A. Prospect theory: An analysis of decision under risk. Econometrica: Journal of the Econometric Society 1979, 47:263-291.
15. Knetsch J.L. The endowment effect and evidence of nonreversible indifference curves. American Economic Review 1989, 79:1277-1284.
16. Massaro D.W., Anderson N.H. Judgmental model of the Ebbinghaus illusion. Journal of Experimental Psychology 1971, 89:147-151.
17. Nosofsky R.M. Attention, similarity, and the identification-categorization relationship. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 1986, 115:39-57.
18. Pennington N., Hastie R. Reasoning in explanation-based decision making. Cognition 1993, 49:123-163.
19. Pettibone J.C., Wedell D.H. Examining models of nondominated decoy effects across judgment and choice. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 2000, 81:300-328.
20. Pettibone J.C., Wedell D.H. Testing alternative explanations of phantom decoy effects. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making 2007, 20:323-341.
21. Pratkanis A.R., Farquhar P.H. A brief history of research on phantom alternatives: Evidence for seven empirical generalizations about phantoms. Basic and Applied Social Psychology 1992, 13:103-122.
22. Roe R.M., Busemeyer J.R., Townsend J.T. Multialternative decision field theory: A dynamic connectionist model of decision making. Psychological Review 2001, 108:370-392.
23. Shafir E., Simonson I., Tversky A. Reason-based choice. Cognition 1993, 49:11-36.
24. Shafir S., Waite T.A., Smith B.H. Context-dependent violations of rational choice in honeybees (Apis melifera) and gray jays (Perisoreus canadensis). Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology 2002, 51:180-187.
25. Shepard R.N. Toward a universal law of generalization for psychological science. Science 1987, September 11, 237:1317-1323.
26. Simonson I. Choice based on reasons: The case of attraction and compromise effects. Journal of Consumer Research 1989, 16:158-174.
27. Stewart N., Chater N., Brown G.D.A. Decision by sampling. Cognitive Psychology 2006, 53:1-26.
28. Stewart N., Simpson K. A decision-by-sampling account of decision under risk. The probabilistic mind: Prospects for Bayesian cognitive science 2008, 261-276. Oxford University Press, Oxford, England. N. Chater, M. Oaksford (Eds.).
29. Tom S.M., Fox C.R., Trepel C., Poldrack R.A. The neural basis of loss aversion in decision-making under risk. Science 2007, January 26, 315:515-518.
30. Tsetsos, K. (2008). Contrasting neurocomputational models of value-based decision making (Unpublished master's thesis). Birkbeck College, University of London, London, England.
31. Tversky A. Elimination by aspects: A theory of choice. Psychological Review 1972, 79:281-299.
32. Tversky A., Kahneman D. Loss aversion in riskless choice: A reference-dependent model. Quarterly Journal of Economics 1991, 106:1039-1061.
33. Tversky A., Simonson I. Context-dependent preferences. Management Science 1993, 39:1179-1189.
34. Usher M., Elhalal A., McClelland J.L. The neurodynamics of choice, value-based decisions, and preference reversal. The probabilistic mind: Prospects for Bayesian cognitive science 2008, 277-300. Oxford University Press, Oxford, England. N. Chater, M. Oaksford (Eds.).
35. Usher M., McClelland J.L. Loss aversion and inhibition in dynamical models of multialternative choice. Psychological Review 2004, 111:757-769.
36. Usher M., Zakay D. A neural network model for attribute-based decision processes. Cognitive Science 1993, 17:349-396.
37. Von Neumann J., Morgenstern O. Theory of games and economic behavior 1947, Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ.