CO2 surface fluxes at grid point scale estimated from a global 21 year reanalysis of atmospheric measurements

Journal of Geophysical Research Atmospheres

Volumn 115, Issue 21, 2010, Pages

  Chevallier, F ^a   Ciais, P ^a   Conway, T J ^b   Aalto, T ^c   Anderson, B E ^d   Bousquet, P ^a   Brunke, E G ^e   Ciattaglia, L ^f   Esaki, Y ^g   Frohlich M ^h   Gomez, A ⁱ   Gomez Pelaez, A J ^j   Haszpra, L ^k   Krummel, P B ^l   Langenfelds, R L ^l   Leuenberger, M ^m   MacHida, T ⁿ   Maignan, F ^a   Matsueda, H ^o   Morgui J A ^p   Mukai, H ⁿ   Nakazawa, T ^q   Peylin, P ^a   Ramonet, M ^a   Rivier, L ^a   Sawa, Y ^o   Schmidt, M ^a   Steele, L P ^l   Vay, S A ^d   Vermeulen, A T ^r   Wofsy, S ^s   Worthy, D ^t   more..

^a LABORATOIRE DES SCIENCES DU CLIMAT ET DE L ENVIRONNEMENT   (France)

^b EARTH SYSTEM RESEARCH LABORATORY   (United States)

^c FINNISH METEOROLOGICAL INSTITUTE   (Finland)

^d NASA LANGLEY RESEARCH CENTER   (United States)

^e SOUTH AFRICAN WEATHER SERVICE   (South Africa)

^f CNR   (Italy)

^g JAPAN METEOROLOGICAL AGENCY   (Japan)

^h ENVIRONMENT AGENCY AUSTRIA   (Austria)

ⁱ NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF WATER AND ATMOSPHERIC RESEARCH   (New Zealand)

^j Meteorological State Agency of Spain   (Spain)

^k HUNGARIAN METEOROLOGICAL SERVICE   (Hungary)

^l CSIRO   (Australia)

^m UNIVERSITY OF BERN   (Switzerland)

ⁿ NATIONAL INSTITUTE FOR ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES   (Japan)

^o METEOROLOGICAL RESEARCH INSTITUTE   (Japan)

^p Laboratori de Recerca Del Clima   (Spain)

^q TOHOKU UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

^r TNO   (Netherlands)

^s HARVARD UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^t ENVIRONMENT CANADA   (Canada)

more..

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BAYESIAN NETWORKS; ERROR ANALYSIS; SURFACE MEASUREMENT; SYSTEMATIC ERRORS; TROPOSPHERE;

AIRCRAFT MEASUREMENT; ATMOSPHERIC MEASUREMENT; ATMOSPHERIC SIMULATIONS; BAYESIAN; BAYESIAN INVERSION; CARBON BUDGETS; FLUX ESTIMATION; FREE TROPOSPHERE; GRID POINTS; INTERANNUAL TIME SCALE; LARGE DATASETS; MIXING RATIOS; MONTE CARLO APPROACH; NORTHERN HEMISPHERES; PAPER DOCUMENTS; REANALYSIS; SPACE AND TIME; SURFACE FLUX; TRANSPORT ERRORS; VERTICAL PROFILE;

BUDGET CONTROL;

AIRBORNE SURVEY; BAYESIAN ANALYSIS; BOUNDARY LAYER; CARBON BUDGET; CARBON DIOXIDE; DATA SET; ERROR ANALYSIS; MONTE CARLO ANALYSIS; NORTHERN HEMISPHERE; SURFACE FLUX; TIMESCALE; TROPOSPHERE;

EID: 78249266021     PISSN: 01480227     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1029/2010JD013887     Document Type: Article

References (35)

1. Berrisford, P., D. Dee, K. Fielding, M. Fuentes, P. Kallberg, S. Kobayashi, and S. Uppala (2009), The ERA-Interim archive, ERA Rep. Ser. 1, 16 pp., Eur. Cent. for Medium-Range Weather Forecasting, Reading, U. K.
2. Bousquet, P., P. Peylin, P. Ciais, C. Le Quéré, P. Friedlingstein, and P. Tans (2000), Regional changes in carbon dioxide fluxes of land and oceans since 1980, Science, 290, 1342-1346, doi:10.1126/science.290. 5495.1342.
3. Bousquet, P., et al. (2006), Contribution of atmospheric and natural sources to atmospheric methane variability, Nature, 443, 439-443, doi:10.1038/nature05132. (Pubitemid 44477278)
4. 2 measurements to quantify regional fluxes-Part 2: Sensitivity of flux accuracy to inverse setup, Atmos. Chem. Phys. Discuss., 8, 18, 621-18, 649, doi:10.5194/acpd-8-18621-2008.
5. 2 sources and sinks from satellite observations: Method and application to TOVS data, J. Geophys. Res., 110, D24309, doi:10.1029/2005JD006390. (Pubitemid 43169422)
6. 2 surface fluxes, Geophys. Res. Lett, 33, L13802, doi:10.1029/2006GL026496. (Pubitemid 44945962)
7. 2 sources and sinks: Theoretical study in a variational data assimilation framework, J. Geophys. Res., 112, D09307, doi:10.1029/2006JD007375. (Pubitemid 47009866)
8. Chevallier, F., R. J. Engelen, C. Carouge, T. J. Conway, P. Peylin, C. Pickett-Heaps, M. Ramonet, P. J. Rayner, and I. Xueref-Remy (2009), AIRS-based versus surface-based estimation of carbon surface fluxes, J. Geophys. Res., 114, D20303, doi:10.1029/2009JD012311.
9. Courtier, P., J.-N. Thépaut, and A. Hollingworth (1994), A strategy for operational implementation of 4D-Var, using an incremental approach, Q. J. R. Meteorol. Soc, 120, 1367-1387, doi:10.1002/qj.49712051912.
10. Denman, K. L., et al. (2007), Couplings between changes in the climate system and biogeochemistry, in Climate Change 2007: The Physical Science Basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, edited by S. Solomon et al., pp. 499-587, Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge, U. K.
11. Desroziers, G., L. Berre, B. Chapnik, and P. Poli (2005), Diagnosis of observation, background and analysis error statistics in observation space, Q. J. R. Meteorol. Soc, 131, 3385-3396, doi:10.1256/qj.05.108.
12. Fisher, M., and P. Courtier (1995), Estimating the covariance matrices of analysis and forecast error in variational data assimilation, Tech. Mem. 220, 26 pp., Eur. Cent. for Medium-Range Weather Forecasting, Reading, U. K.
13. GLOBALVIEW-CO (2008), Cooperative Atmospheric Data Integration Project-Carbon Monoxide [CD-ROM], Earth Syst. Res. Lab., Natl. Ocean. Atmos. Admin., Boulder, Colo. (Available at ftp://ftp.cmdl.noaa.gov/ccg/co/GLOBALVIEW)
14. GLOBALVIEW-CO2 (2009), Cooperative Atmospheric Data Integration Project-Carbon Dioxide [CD-ROM], Earth Syst. Res. Lab., Natl. Ocean. Atmos. Admin., Boulder, Colo. (Available at ftp://ftp.cmdl.noaa.gov/ccg/co2/GLOBALVIEW)
15. 2 sources and sinks using atmospheric transport models, Nature, 415(6872), 626-630, doi:10.1038/415626a. (Pubitemid 34136386)
16. Hourdin, F., et al. (2006), The LMDZ4 general circulation model: Climate performance and sensitivity to parametrized physics with emphasis on tropical convection, Clim. Dyn., 27, 787-813, doi:10.1007/s00382-006-0158-0. (Pubitemid 44550673)
17. 2 in the 1980s, J. Geophys. Res., 104, 18, 555-18, 581, doi:10.1029/1999JD900146.
18. Krinner, G., N. Viovy, N. de Noblet-Ducoudré, J. Ogée, J. Polcher, P. Friedlingstein, P. Ciais, S. Sitch, and I. C. Prentice (2005), A dynamic global vegetation model for studies of the coupled atmosphere-biosphere system, Global Biogeochem. Cycles, 19, GB1015, doi:10.1029/2003GB002199. (Pubitemid 40801466)
19. Lauvaux, T., et al. (2009a), Bridging the gap between atmospheric concentrations and local ecosystem measurements, Geophys. Res. Lett., 36, L19809, doi:10.1029/2009GL039574.
20. 2 sources and sinks using ensemble model simulations, Biogeosciences, 5, 4813-4846.
21. 2: Experimental overview and diurnal cycle results for 2002, Global Biogeochem. Cycles, 22, GB3009, doi:10.1029/2007GB003050.
22. 2 sink due to recent climate change, Science, 316, 1735-1738, doi:10.1126/science.1136188. (Pubitemid 46988546)
23. 2 and other trace gas species using commercial airlines, J. Atmos. Oceanic Technol., 25(10), 1744-1754, doi:10.1175/2008JTECHA1082.1.
24. Masarie, K. A., and P. P. Tans (1995), Extension and integration of atmospheric carbon dioxide data into a globally consistent measurement record, J. Geophys. Res., 100 (D6), 11, 593-11, 610, doi:10.1029/95JD00859.
25. Olivier, J. G. J., and J. J. M. Berdowski (2001), Global emissions sources and sinks, in The Climate System, edited by J. Berdowski, R. Guicherit, and B. J. Heij, pp. 33-78, A. A. Balkema, Lisse, Netherlands.
26. 2: Analysis of synoptic-scale variations for the period 2002-2003, Global Biogeochem. Cycles, 22, GB4013, doi:10.1029/2007GB003081.
27. Peters, W., et al. (2007), An atmospheric perspective on North American carbon dioxide exchange: CarbonTracker, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A., 104, 18, 925-18, 930, doi:10.1073/pnas.0708986104.
28. 2 estimates using model simulations and aircraft data, J. Geophys. Res., 112, D09313, doi:10.1029/2005JD007018. (Pubitemid 47009872)
29. Randerson, J. T., G. R. van der Werf, L. Giglio, G. J. Collatz, and P. S. Kasibhatla (2007), Global Fire Emissions Database, version 2.1, Oak Ridge Natl. Lab., Oak Ridge, Tenn., doi:10.3334/ORNLDAAC/849.
30. 2 flux history 1982-2001 inferred from atmospheric data using a global inversion of atmospheric transport, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 3, 1919-1964, doi:10.5194/acp-3-1919-2003.
31. 2 inversions: A quantitative assessment, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 6, 149-161, doi:10.5194/acp-6-149-2006.
32. 2, Science, 316, 1732-1735, doi:10.1126/science.1137004. (Pubitemid 46988545)
33. 2 Database: Measurements performed during 1968-2007, version 2007, ORNL/CDIAC-152, NDP-088a, 20 pp., Carbon Dioxide Inf. Anal. Cent., Oak Ridge Natl. Lab., U. S. Dep. of Energy, Oak Ridge, Tenn.
34. 2 flux over the global oceans, Deep Sea Res., Part II, 56, 554-577, doi:10.1016/j.dsr2.2008.12. 009.
35. van der Werf, G. R., J. T. Randerson, G. J. Collatz, L. Giglio, P. S. Kasibhatla, A. F. Arellano, S. C. Olsen, and E. S. Kasischke (2004), Continental-scale partitioning of fire emissions during the 1997 to 2001 El Niño/La Niña period, Science, 303(5654), 73-76, doi:10.1126/science. 1090753. (Pubitemid 38055772)