The Sex offender risk appraisal Guide (SORAG);Der Sex Offender Risk Appraisal Guide (SORAG)

Fortschritte der Neurologie Psychiatrie

Volumn 78, Issue 11, 2010, Pages 658-667

  Rossegger, A ^a   Gerth, J ^a   Urbaniok, F ^a   Laubacher, A ^a   Endrass, J ^a  

^a Psychiatrisch Psychologischer Dienst ^*  (Switzerland)

Author keywords

German translation; recidivism risk; SORAG; validity

Indexed keywords

CHILD SEXUAL ABUSE; CLINICAL ASSESSMENT TOOL; EXTERNAL VALIDITY; GERMANY; HUMAN; KNOWLEDGE; PROGNOSIS; RECURRENCE RISK; REVIEW; RISK ASSESSMENT; RISK FACTOR; SEXUAL BEHAVIOR; SEXUAL CRIME;

ADULT; CHILD; CHILD ABUSE, SEXUAL; CRIMINALS; DATA INTERPRETATION, STATISTICAL; GERMANY; HUMANS; LANGUAGE; MENTAL DISORDERS; PSYCHOLOGICAL TESTS; RAPE; RECURRENCE; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; RISK ASSESSMENT; ROC CURVE; SEX OFFENSES;

EID: 78249256681     PISSN: 07204299     EISSN: 14393522     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1055/s-0029-1245688     Document Type: Review

References (49)

1. Seto M C. Is more better? Combining actuarial risk scales to predict recidivism among adult sex offenders. Psychological Assessment 2005 17 156-167
2. Grove W M., Zald D H., Lebow B S. et al. Clinical versus mechanical prediction: A meta-analysis. Psychological Assessment 2000 12 19-30
3. Hilton N Z., Simmons J L. The Influence of Actuarial Risk Assessment in Clinical Judgments and Tribunal Decisions about Mentally Disordered Offenders in Maximum Security. Law and Human Behavior 2001 25 393-408
4. Quinsey V L., Harris G T., Rice M E. et al. Violent offenders: Appraising and managing risk. 2. Aufl. Washington, DC American Psychological Association 2006
5. Swets J A., Dawes R M., Monahan J. Psychological science can improve diagnostic decisions. Psychological Science in the Public Interest 2000 1 1-26
6. Hanson R K., Morton-Bourgon K E. The accuracy of recidivism risk assessments for sexual offenders: a meta-analysis of 118 prediction studies. Psychological Assessment 2009 21 1-21
7. Andrews D A., Bonta J. Psychology of Criminal Conduct. 3. Aufl. Cincinnati Anderson 2003
8. Boetticher A, Kröber H L., Müller-Isberner R et al. Mindestanforderungen für Prognosegutachten. Forensische Psychiatrie, Psychologie, Kriminologie 2007 1 90-100
9. Harris G T., Rice M E., Quinsey V L. Violent Recidivism of Mentally Disordered Offenders: The Development of a Statistical Prediction Instrument. Criminal Justice and Behavior 1993 20 315-335
10. Epperson D L., Kaul J D., Huot S et al. Minnesota Sex Offender Screening Tool-Revised (MnSOST-R) Technical Paper: Development, Validation, and Recommended Risk Level Cut Scores. St. Paul, MN Minnesota Department of Corrections 2003
11. Thornton D, Mann R, Webster S et al. Distinguishing and Combining Risks for Sexual and Violent Recidivism. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences 2003 989 225-235
12. Hanson R K., Thornton D. Static 99: Improving actuarial risk assessments for sex offenders. Ottawa Solicitor General Canada 1999
13. U. S. National Library of Medicine. National Institutes of Health 2009 http://www.pubmed.com
14. Rettenberger M, Matthes A, Boer D P. et al. Prospective Actuarial Risk Assessment: A Comparison of Five Risk Assessment Instruments in Different Sexual Offender Subtypes. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology 2009
15. Kingston D A., Yates P M., Firestone P et al. Long-term predictive validity of the risk matrix 2000: a comparison with the static-99 and the sex offender risk appraisal guide. Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment 2008 20 466-484
16. Ducro C, Pham T. Evaluation of the SORAG and the Static-99 on Belgian Sex Offenders Committed to a Forensic Facility. Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment 2006 18 15-26
17. Harris G T., Rice M E. Actuarial Assessment of Risk among Sex Offenders. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences 2003 989 198-210
18. Nunes K L., Firestone P, Bradford J M. et al. A comparison of modified versions of the Static-99 and the Sex Offender Risk Appraisal Guide. Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment 2002 14 253-269
19. Rice M E., Harris G T. Men Who Molest Their Sexually Immature Daughters: Is a Special Explanation Required? Journal of Abnormal Psychology 2002 111 329-339
20. Looman J. Comparison of Two Risk Assessment Instruments for Sexual Offenders. Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment 2006 18 193-206
21. Bartosh D L., Garby T, Lewis D et al. Differences in the predictive validity of actuarial risk assessments in relation to sex offender type. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology 2003 47 422-438
22. Harris G T., Rice M E., Quinsey V L. et al. A Multisite Comparison of Actuarial Risk Instruments for Sex Offenders. Psychological Assessment 2003 15 413-425
23. Mental Health Centre Penetanguishene Research Department. Penetanguishene. ON, Canada 2007
24. Eher R, Rettenberger M, Schilling F et al. Failure of Static-99 and SORAG to predict relevant reoffense categories in relevant sexual offender subtypes: A prospective study. Sexual Offender Treatment 2008 3 1-14
25. Langton C M., Barbaree H E., Seto M C. et al. Actuarial Assessment of Risk for Reoffense Among Adult Sex Offenders: Evaluating the Predictive Accuracy of the Static-2002 and Five Other Instruments. Criminal Justice and Behavior 2007 34 37-59
26. Barbaree H E., Seto M C., Langton C M. et al. Evaluating the Predictive Accuracy of Six Risk Assessment Instruments for Adult Sex Offenders. Criminal Justice and Behavior 2001 28 490-521
27. Rossegger A, Vetter S, Danielsson C et al. Validation and Calibration of the VRAG in a Swiss offender population. submitted
28. Urbaniok F, Rinne T, Held L et al. Forensische Risikokalkulationen: Grundlegende methodische Aspekte zur Beurteilung der Anwendbarkeit und Validität verschiedener Verfahren. Fortschritte der Neurologie-Psychiatrie 2008 76 470-477
29. Fawcett T. An introduction to ROC analysis. Pattern Recognition Letters 2006 27 861-874
30. Hosmer D W., Lemeshow S. Applied logistic regression. New York John Wiley & Sons, Inc 2000
31. Hanson R K., Morton-Bourgon K E. Predictors of Sexual Recidivism: An Updated Meta-Analysis. Public Works and Government Services Canada 2004
32. Rice M E., Harris G T. Cross-Validation and Extension of the Violence Risk Appraisal Guide for Child Molesters and Rapists. Law and Human Behavior 1997 21 231-241
33. Hanson R K., Bussiere M T. Predicting relapse: a meta-analysis of sexual offender recidivism studies. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology 1998 66 348-362
34. Urbaniok F, Endrass J, Rossegger A et al. The prediction of criminal recidivism: the implication of sampling in prognostic models. European Archives of Psychiatry and Clinical Neuroscience 2007 257 129-134
35. Rossegger A, Urbaniok F, Danielsson C et al. Der Violence Risk Appraisal Guide (VRAG) Ein Instrument zur Kriminalprognose bei Gewaltstraftätern: Übersichtsarbeit und autorisierte deutsche Übersetzung. Fortschritte der Neurologie-Psychiatrie 2009 77 577-584
36. Rice M E., Harris G T., Quinsey V L. A Follow-Up of Rapists Assessed in a Maximum-Security Psychiatric Facility. Journal of Interpersonal Violence 1990 5 435-448
37. Rice M E., Quinsey V L., Harris G T. Sexual Recidivism Among Child Molesters Released From a Maximum Security Psychiatric Institution. Journal of Consulting & Clinical Psychology 1991 59 381-386
38. Quinsey V L., Rice M E., Harris G T. Actuarial Prediction of Sexual Recidivism. Journal of Interpersonal Violence 1995 10 85-105
39. Hare R D. Manual for the Revised Psychopathy Checklist. 2. Aufl. Toronto, ON Multi-Health Systems 2003
40. Marshall W L. Clinical and research limitations in the use of phallometric testing with sexual offenders. Sexual Offender Treatment 2006 1 1-19
41. Venzlaff U, Foerster K. Psychiatrische Begutachtung. Ein praktisches Handbuch für Ärzte und Juristen. 5 Aufl. München Elsevier; Urban & Fischer 2009
42. Seto M C., Harris G T., Rice M E. et al. The screening scale for pedophilic interests predicts recidivism among adult sex offenders with child victims. Archives of Sexual Behavior 2004 33 455-466
43. Seto M C., Lalumiere M L. A Brief Screening Scale to Identify Pedophilic Interests Among Child Molesters. Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment 2001 13 15-25
44. Brown L K. Assessing risk for elopement and breaches of conditional release in insanity acquitees. Dissertation Abstracts International: Section B: The Sciences and Engineering 2004 64 (8-B) 3739
45. Quinsey V L., Coleman G, Jones B et al. Proximal antecedents of eloping and reoffending among supervised mentally disordered offenders. Journal of Interpersonal Violence 1997 12 794-813
46. Hare R D. Scoring guidelines for the Hare PCL: SV. Toronto, ON, Canada Multi-Health Systems 1998
47. Forth A E., Kosson D S., Hare R D. Hare Psychopathy Checklist: Youth version. Toronto, ON, Canada Multi-Health Systems 2003
48. Rettenberger M, Eher R. Predicting Reoffence in Sexual Offender Subtypes: A Prospective Validation Study of the German Version of the Sexual Offender Risk Appraisal Guide (SORAG). Sexual Offender Treatment 2007 2 1-12
49. Rettenberger M, Eher R. Aktuarische Kriminalprognosemethoden und Sexualdelinquenz: die deutsche Version des SORAG. Monatsschrift für Kriminologie und Strafrechtsform 2007 90 484-497