Discretised link travel time models based on cumulative flows: Formulations and properties

Transportation Research Part B: Methodological

Volumn 45, Issue 1, 2011, Pages 232-254

  Long, Jiancheng ^a,b   Gao, Ziyou ^b   Szeto, W Y ^c  

^a BEIHANG UNIVERSITY   (China)

^b BEIJING JIAOTONG UNIVERSITY   (China)

^c UNIVERSITY OF HONG KONG   (Hong Kong)

Author keywords

Causality; Cumulative flow; FIFO; Link travel time; Piecewise linearization

Indexed keywords

LINEARIZATION; TRAFFIC CONTROL;

CAUSALITY; CUMULATIVE FLOW; FIFO; LINK TRAVEL TIME; PIECEWISE LINEARIZATION;

TRAVEL TIME;

INTERPOLATION; LINEARITY; NUMERICAL MODEL; TRAFFIC MANAGEMENT; TRAVEL TIME;

EID: 78149496094     PISSN: 01912615     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.trb.2010.05.002     Document Type: Article

References (31)

1. Astarita V. A continuous time link model for dynamic network loading models based on travel time function. Transportation and Traffic Theory 1996, 79-102. Pergamon Elservier, New York. J.B. Lesort (Ed.).
2. Carey M., Ge Y.E., McCartney M. A whole-link travel-time model with desirable properties. Transportation Science 2003, 37(1):83-96.
3. Carey M., Ge Y.E. Convergence of a discretised travel-time model. Transportation Science 2005, 39(1):25-38.
4. Carey M., Ge Y.E. Retaining desirable properties in discretising a travel-time model. Transportation Research Part B 2007, 41(5):540-553.
5. Carey M., Srinivasan A. Externalities, average and marginal costs, and tolls on congested networks with time-varying flows. Operations Research 1993, 41(1):217-231.
6. Chen H.K. Dynamic Travel Choice Models: A Variational Inequality Approach 1999, Springer, Berlin, Germany, pp. 27-28.
7. Daganzo C.F. The cell transmission model: a simple dynamic representation of highway traffic. Transportation Research Part B 1994, 28(4):269-287.
8. Daganzo C.F. The cell transmission model, Part II: network traffic. Transportation Research Part B 1995, 29(2):79-93.
9. Daganzo C.F. Properties of link travel time functions under dynamic loads. Transportation Research Part B 1995, 29(2):95-98.
10. Friesz T.L., Bernstein D.H., Smith T.E., Tobin R.L., Wie B.W. A variational inequality formulation of the dynamic network user equilibrium problem. Operations Research 1993, 41(1):179-191.
11. Huang H.J., Lam W.H.K. Modeling and solving the dynamic user equilibrium route and departure time choice problem in network with queues. Transportation Research Part B 2002, 36(3):253-273.
12. Kuwahara M., Akamatsu T. Dynamic user optimal assignment with physical queues for a many-to-many OD pattern. Transportation Research Part B 2001, 35(5):461-479.
13. Lam W.H.K., Huang H.J. Dynamic user optimal traffic assignment model for many to one travel demand. Transportation Research Part B 1995, 29(4):243-259.
14. Lian A.P., Gao Z.Y., Long J.C. A dynamic user optimal assignment problem of link variables based on the cell transmission model. Acta Automatica Sinica 2007, 33(8):852-859. in Chinese.
15. Lighthill M.H., Whitham G.B. On kinematics wave: II a theory of traffic flow on long crowed roads. Proceedings of the Royal Society, London, Series A 1955, 229(1178):317-345.
16. Lo H.K., Szeto W.Y. A cell-based variational inequality formulation of the dynamic user optimal assignment problem. Transportation Research Part B 2002, 36(5):421-443.
17. Merchant D.K., Nemhauser G.L. A model and an algorithm for the dynamic traffic assignment problem. Transportation Science 1978, 12(3):183-199.
18. Nagurney A. Network Economics: A Variational Inequality Approach 1993, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Norwell, Massachusetts, USA.
19. Newell G.F. A simplified theory on kinematic wave in highway traffic, part I: general theory; part II: queuing at freeway bottlenecks; part III: multi-destination flows. Transportation Research Part B 1993, 27(4):281-314.
20. Nie, X.J., 2003. The study of dynamic user-equilibrium traffic assignment. Ph.D. Thesis, University of California, Davis.
21. Nie Y., Zhang H.M. Solving the dynamic user optimal assignment problem considering queue spillback. Networks and Spatial Economics 2010, 10(1):49-71.
22. Ran B., Boyce D.E. Modelling Dynamic Transportation Networks 1996, Springer-Verlag, Heidelberg, Germany.
23. Richards P.I. Shock waves on the highway. Operations Research 1956, 4(1):42-51.
24. Shin M.S., Ran B., He R.R. Introducing platoon dispersion into analytical dynamic assignment process. Transportation Research Record 2000, 1733:96-104.
25. Szeto W.Y. The enhanced lagged cell transmission model for dynamic traffic assignment. Transportation Research Record 2008, 2085:76-85.
26. Szeto W.Y., Lo H.K. A cell-based simultaneous route and departure time choice model with elastic demand. Transportation Research Part B 2004, 38(7):593-612.
27. Szeto W.Y., Lo H.K. Dynamic traffic assignment: properties and extensions. Transportmetrica 2006, 2(1):31-52.
28. Wie B.W., Tobin R.L. Dynamic congestion pricing models for general traffic networks. Transportation Research Part B 1998, 32(5):313-327.
29. Wu J.H., Chen Y., Florian M. The continuous dynamic network loading problem: a mathematical formulation and solution method. Transportation Research Part B 1998, 32(3):173-187.
30. Yperman, I., 2007. The link transmission model for dynamic network loading. Ph.D. Thesis, Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
31. Ziliaskopoulos A.K. A linear programming model for the single destination system optimum dynamic traffic assignment problem. Transportation Science 2000, 34(1):37-49.