Why don't health researchers report consumer involvement?

Quality in Primary Care

Volumn 12, Issue 2, 2004, Pages 151-157

  Chambers, Ruth ^a   O'Brien, Louise M ^a   Linnell, Sue ^a   Sharp, Steve ^b  

^a STAFFORDSHIRE UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

^b North Staffordshire Med Institute   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Consumer involvement; Lay; Publication; Research

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CONSUMER; FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT; HUMAN; MEDICAL DECISION MAKING; MEDICAL INFORMATION; MEDICAL LITERATURE; MEDICAL RESEARCH; METHODOLOGY; PERCEPTION; PUBLISHING; RANDOMIZATION; SKILL;

EID: 3543007151     PISSN: 14791072     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (19)

1. Mackenney S, Fallberg L and Andersen T. Supporting Patients' Rights and Empowering Citizens: emerging systems in Europe. Copenhagen: European Partnership on Patients' Rights and Citizens' Empowerment, World Health Organisation, 2001.
2. Department of Health. Patient and Public Involvement in the New NHS. London: Department of Health, 1999.
3. Hanley B. Involvement Works. Winchester: Standing Group on Consumers in NHS Research, 1999.
4. Anon. How consumers can and should improve clinical trials [editorial]. The Lancet 2001;357:1721.
5. Hanley B, Truesdale A, King A, Elbourne D and Chalmers I. Involving consumers in designing, conducting and interpreting randomised controlled trials: questionnaire survey. British Medical Journal 2001;322:519-23.
6. Standing Advisory Group on Consumer Involvement in the NHS R and D Programme. Research: what's in it for consumers? Wetherby: National Health Service Executive, 1998.
7. Oliver S, Milne R, Bradburn J et al. Involving consumers in a needs-led research programme: a pilot project. Health Expectations 2001;4(1):18-28.
8. Hanley B, Bradburn J, Gorin S et al. Involving Consumers in Research and Development in the NHS: briefing notes for researchers. Winchester: Consumers in NHS Research Support Unit, 2000.
9. Smith J, Regen E, Shapiro J and Baines D. National evaluation of general practitioner commissioning pilots: lessons for primary care groups. British Journal of General Practice 2000;50:469-72.
10. Williams SE, Bond CM and Menzies C. A pharmaceutical needs assessment in a primary care setting. British Journal of General Practice 2000;50:95-9.
11. Hovell MF, Zakarian JM, Matt GE et al. Effect of counselling mothers on their children's exposure to tobacco smoke: randomised controlled trial. British Medical Journal 2000;321:337-42.
12. Fielder HMP, Poon-King CM, Palmer SR, Moss N and Coleman G. Assessment of impact on health of residents living near the Nant-Y-Gwyddon landfill site: retrospective analysis. British Medical Journal 2000;320:19-23.
13. Nosten F, van Vugt M, Price M et al. Effects of artesunate-mefloquine combination on incidence of plasmodium falciparum malaria and mefloquine resistance in Western Thailand: a prospective study. Lancet 2000;356:297-302.
14. Meijer JCM, Tehelenburg WCH, Bourna BN, Bertina RM and Rosendaal FR. High levels of coagulation factor X1 as a risk factor for venous thrombosis. New England Journal of Medicine 2000;342:696-701.
15. Cleophas RC and Cleophas TJ. Is selective reporting of clinical research unethical as well as unscientific? International Journal of Clinical Pharmacology and Therapeutics 1999;37(1):1-7.
16. Carter Y, Shaw S and Thomas C (eds). Patient Participation and Ethical Considerations. Master classes in primary care research. No 5. London: Royal College of General Practitioners, 2001.
17. Chambers R. Involving patients and the public - is it worth the effort? Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine 2001;94:375-7.
18. Dieppe P. To cure or not to cure, that is not the question. Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine 2000;93:611-13.
19. Department of Health. Research Governance Framework for Health and Social Care (2e). London: Department of Health, 2003.