Sensory, cognitive and motor assessment of children with poor academic performance: An auditory evoked potential study

Indian Journal of Physiology and Pharmacology

Volumn 54, Issue 3, 2010, Pages 255-264

  Farah, Khaliq ^a   Kaushal, Kumar Alam ^a   Vaney, Neelam ^a   Singh, T B ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY COLLEGE OF MEDICAL SCIENCES   (India)

^b INSTITUTE OF HUMAN BEHAVIOUR AND ALLIED SCIENCES   (India)

Author keywords

Auditory brainstem response slow vertex response (svr) (abr) mid latency response (mlr) p300 poor academic performance reaction time

Indexed keywords

ACADEMIC ACHIEVEMENT; ARTICLE; AUDITORY NERVOUS SYSTEM; CHILD; COGNITION; CONTROLLED STUDY; EVOKED AUDITORY RESPONSE; EVOKED BRAIN STEM AUDITORY RESPONSE; FEMALE; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; LATENT PERIOD; MALE; MESENCEPHALON; MID LATENCY RESPONSE; MOTOR PERFORMANCE; NORMAL HUMAN; PONS; PRESCHOOL CHILD; RESPONSE TIME; SCHOOL CHILD; SEX DIFFERENCE; SLOW VERTEX RESPONSE;

ACHIEVEMENT; CHILD; COGNITION; EVENT-RELATED POTENTIALS, P300; EVOKED POTENTIALS, AUDITORY, BRAIN STEM; FEMALE; HUMANS; INTELLIGENCE; MALE; REACTION TIME; SENSATION;

EID: 78149461818     PISSN: 00195499     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (37)

1. Karande S, Kulkarni M. Poor school performance. Ind J Pediatr 2005; 72: 961-967.
2. Dworkin PH. School failure. Paed Rev 1989; 10: 301-312
3. Jura MA, Humphery LA. Neuropsycological and cognitive assessment of children. In: Kaplan and Sadock's comprehensive textbook of psychiatry. Lippincott Williams and Wilkins Publications. London: 2005; 1: 895-815.
4. Obrzut JE, Morris GL, Wilson SL, Lord JM, Caraveo LE. Brain stem evoked response in the assessment of learning disabilities. Intern. J Neurosci 1987; 32: 811-823.
5. Purdy SC, Kelly AS, Davies MG. Auditory brainstem response, middle latency response and late cortical evoked potentials in children with learning disabilities. J Am Acad Audiol 2002; 13: 367-382.
6. Marosi E, Harmony T, Becker J. Brainstem evoked potentials in learning disabled children. Int J Neuosci 1990; 50: 233-242.
7. Lubar JF, Mann CA, Gross DM, Shively MS. Differences in semantic event related potentials in learning disabled, normal and gifted children. Biofeedback Self Regul 1992; 17: 41-57.
8. Jing J, Morinaga R, Zhang X. The event-related potential characteristics of reading disabilities in children under condition of continous performance test. Zhonhua Yu Fang Yi Xue Za Zhi 2001; 35: 93-95.
9. Diniz Junior J, Mangabeira-Albernaz PL, Munhoz MSL, Fukuda Y. Cognitive potentials in children with learning disabilities. Acta Otolaryngol 1997; 117: 211-213.
10. Stockard JJ, Pope-Stockard JE, Sharbrough FW. Brainstem auditory evoked potentials in neurology: methodology, interpretation and clinical application. In: Aminoff MJ, editor. Electrodiagnosis in clinical Neurology. 3rd ed. New York: Churchill Livingstone; 1992: 503-536.
11. Tandon OP. Averaged evoked potentials-clinical applications of short latency responses. Ind J Physiol Pharmacol 1998; 42: 172-188.
12. Sohmer H, Feinmesser M. Cochlear action potentials recorded from the external ear in man. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 1967; 76: 427-435.
13. Jerger S, Martin RC, Jerger J. Specific auditory perceptual dysfunction in a learning disabled child. Ear Hear 1987; 8: 78-86.
14. Cunningham J, Nicol T, Zecker SG, et al. Neurobiologic responses to speech in noise in children with learning problems: deficits and strategies for improvement. Clin Neurophysiol 2001; 112: 785-767.
15. Greenblatt ER, Bar A, Zappulla RA. Learning disability assessed through audiologic and physiologic measures: A case study. J Comm Disord 1983; 16: 309-313.
16. Piggott LR, Anderson T. Brainstem auditory evoked responses in children with central language disturbance. J Am Acad of Child Psych 1983; 22: 535-540.
17. Bishop DV, McArthur GM. Individual differences in auditory processing in specific language impairment: a follow-up study using event related potentials and behavioural thresholds. Cortex 2005; 41: 327-341.
18. Arehole S, Augustine LE, Simhadri R. Middle latency response in children with learning disabilities: Preliminary findings. J Commun Disord 1985; 28: 21-38.
19. Tonnquist-Uhlen I. Topography of auditory evoked long-latency potentials in children with severe language impairment: the P2 and N2 components. Ear Hear 1996b; 17: 314-326.
20. Bruneau N, Roux S, Adrien JL, Barthelemy C. Auditory associative cortex dysfunction in children with autism: evidence from late auditory evoked potentials (N1wave-T complex). Clin Neurophysiol 1999; 110: 1927-1934.
21. Galaburda AM, Eidelberg D. Symmetry and asymmetry in the human posterior thalamus: II. Thalamic lesions in a case of developmental dyslexia. Arch Neurol 1982; 39: 333-336.
22. Green RL, Hustler JJ, Loftus WC, et al. The caudal infra sylvian surface in dyslexia: Novel magnetic resonance imaging based findings. Neurology 1999; 53: 974-981.
23. Preis S, Steinmetz H, Knorr U, Jancke L. Corpus callosum size in children with developmental language disorder. Brain Res Cogn Brain Res 2000; 10: 37-44.
24. Kraus N, McGee TJ, Carrell TD, et al Auditory neurophysiologic responses & discrimination deficits in children with learning problems. Science 1996; 273: 971-973.
25. Picton TW, Alain C, Woods DL, et al. Intracerebral sources of human auditory-evoked potentials. Audiol Neurootol 1999; 4: 64-79.
26. Taylor MJ. The role of event-related potentials in the study of normal and abnormal cognitive development. In: Boller F, Grafmal editors. Handbook of Neuropsychology. Amsterdam Elseveir, London: 1995; 187-211.
27. Bernal J, Harmony T, Rodriguez M, et al. Auditory event related potentials in poor readers. Int J Psychophysiol 2000; 36: 11-23.
28. Holocomb PJ, Ackerman PT, Dykman RA. Cognitive event-related brain potentials in children with attention and reading deficits. Psychophysiology 1985; 22: 656-667.
29. Jirsa RE, Clontz KB. Long latency auditory event related potentials from children with auditory processing disorders. Ear Hear 1990; 11: 222-232.
30. Yagi Y, Coburn KL, Estes KM, Arruda JE. Effects of aerobic exercise and gender on visual and auditory P300, reaction time, and accuracy. Eur J Appl Physiol Occup Physiol 1999; 80: 402-408.
31. McCarthy G, Donchin E. A metric for thought: A comparison of P 300 latency and reaction time. Science 1981; 211: 77-80.
32. Silman S, Silverman CA, Emmer MB, Central auditory processing disorders and reduced motivation: Three case studies. J Am Acad Audiol 2000; 11: 57-63.
33. Costa Neto TT, Ito YI, Fukuda Y, Gananca MM, Caovilla HH. Effects of gender and head size on the auditory brainstem response. Rev Laryngol Otol Rhinol (Bord) 1991; 112: 17-19.
34. Aoyagi M, Kim Y, Yokoyama J, Kiren T, Suzuki Y, Koike Y. Head size as a basis of gender difference in the latency of the brainstem auditory-evoked response. Audiology 1990; 29: 107-112.
35. Braverman ER, Chen TJ, Chen AL, Kerner MM, Tung H, Waite RL, Schoolfield J, Blum K. Preliminary investigation of plasma levels of sex hormones and human growth factor(s), and P300 latency as correlates to cognitive decline as a function of gender. BMC Res Notes 2009; 7: 126.
36. Ivanovic DM, Perez HT, Olivares MG, Diaz NS, Leyton BD, Ivanovic RM. Scholastic achievement; a multivariate analysis of nutritional, intellectual, socioeconomic, sociocultural, familial and demographic variables in Chilean school age children. Nutrition 2004; 20: 878-889.
37. Pratinidhi AK, Kurulkar PV, Garad SG, Dalal M. Epidemiological aspects of school dropouts in children between 7-15 years in rural Maharashtra. Ind J Pediatr 1992; 59: 423-427.