Comparative study of common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) and mungbean (Vigna radiata (L.) Wilczek) response to seven watering regimes in a controlled environment

Crop and Pasture Science

Volumn 61, Issue 11, 2010, Pages 918-928

  Bourgault, M ^a   Smith, D L ^a  

^a MCGILL UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BIOMASS; COMPARATIVE STUDY; DICOTYLEDON; DROUGHT RESISTANCE; FLOWERING; GAS EXCHANGE; LEAF AREA; LEGUME; PHENOTYPE; PHOTOSYNTHESIS; SOIL MOISTURE; TRANSPIRATION; WATER CONTENT; WATER STRESS;

PHASEOLUS VULGARIS; VIGNA RADIATA; VIGNA RADIATA VAR. RADIATA;

EID: 78149456386     PISSN: 18360947     EISSN: 18365795     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1071/CP10141     Document Type: Article

References (43)

1. Adams MW, Coyne DP, Davis JHC, Graham PH, Francis CA (1985) Common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.). In 'Grain legume crops'. (Eds RJ Summerfield, EH Roberts) pp. 433-476. (Collins: London)
2. Blum A (1996) Crop responses to drought and the interpretation of adaptation. Plant Growth Regulation 20, 135-148. doi:10.1007/BF00024010
3. Bourgault M (2009) Legume production in semi-arid areas: comparative study of the physiology of drought tolerance in common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) and mungbean (Vigna radiata (L.) Wilczek). PhD Dissertation, McGill University, Montreal, Canada.
4. Bourgault M, Madramootoo CA, Webber HA, Stulina G, Horst M, Smith DL (2007) Legume production and irrigation strategies in a semi-arid environment: yield, yield components, and water relations of common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) and green gram (Vigna radiata (L.) Wilczek). Options Mé diterannéennes B 56, 223-234.
5. Bourgault M, Madramootoo CA, Webber HA, Stulina G, Horst M, Smith DL (2010) Effects of deficit irrigaiton and salinity stress on common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) and mungbean (Vigna radiata (L.) Wilczek) grown in a controlled environment. Journal of Agronomy&Crop Science 196, 262-272.
6. Broughton WJ, Hernandez G, Blair M, Beebe S, Gepts P, Vanderleyden J (2003) Beans (Phaseolus spp.) - model food legumes. Plant and Soil 252, 55-128. doi:10.1023/A:1024146710611 (Pubitemid 36878452)
7. Brown RH, Byrd GT (1997) Transpiration efficiency, specific leaf weight, and mineral concentration in peanut and pearl millet. Crop Science 37, 475-480. doi:10.2135/cropsci1997.0011183X003700020028x
8. Bushby HVA, Lawn RJ (1992) Accumulation and partitioning of nitrogen and dry-matter by contrasting genotypes of mungbean (Vigna radiata (L.) Wilczek). Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 43, 1609-1628. doi:10.1071/AR9921609
9. Byrd GT, May PA (2000) Physiological comparisons of switchgrass cultivars differing in transpiration efficiency. Crop Science 40, 1271-1277. doi:10.2135/cropsci2000.4051271x
10. Chapman SC (2008) Use of crop models to understand genotype by environment interactions for drought in real-world and simulated plant breeding trials. Euphytica 161, 195-208. doi:10.1007/s10681-007-9623-z
11. Costa França MG, Thi ATP, Pimentel C, Rossiello ROP, Zuily-Fodil Y, Laffray D (2000) Differences in growth and water relations among Phaseolus vulgaris cultivars in response to induced drought stress. Environmental and Experimental Botany 43, 227-237. doi:10.1016/S0098-8472(99)00060-X (Pubitemid 30324863)
12. Cruz de Carvalho MH, Laffray D, Louguet P (1998) Comparison of the physiological responses of Phaseolus vulgaris and Vigna unguiculata cultivars when submitted to drought conditions. Environmental and Experimental Botany 40, 197-207. doi:10.1016/S0098-8472(98)00037-9 (Pubitemid 29009953)
13. De Costa W, Shanmugathasan KN (1999) Effects of irrigation at different growth stages on vegetative growth of mung bean, Vigna radiata (L.) Wilczek, in dry and intermediate zones of Sri Lanka. Journal of Agronomy and Crop Science-Zeitschrift Fur Acker Und Pflanzenbau 183, 137-143. doi:10.1046/j.1439- 037x.1999.00328.x (Pubitemid 29442691)
14. Dreccer MF, van Herwaarden AF, Chapman SC (2009) Grain number and grain weight in wheat lines contrasting for stem water soluble carbohydrate concentration. Field Crops Research 112, 43-54. doi:10.1016/j.fcr.2009.02.006
15. Farquhar GD, Oleary MH, Berry JA (1982) On the relationship between carbon isotope discrimination and the inter-cellular carbon-dioxide concentration in leaves. Australian Journal of Plant Physiology 9, 121-137. doi:10.1071/PP9820121
16. Fletcher AL, Sinclair TR, Allen LH (2007) Transpiration responses to vapor pressure deficit in well watered 'slow-wilting' and commercial soybean. Environmental and Experimental Botany 61, 145-151. doi:10.1016/j.envexpbot.2007. 05.004 (Pubitemid 47332602)
17. Graham PH, Ranalli P (1997) Common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.). Field Crops Research 53, 131-146. doi:10.1016/S0378-4290(97)00112-3 (Pubitemid 27307419)
18. Haqqani AM, Pandey RK (1994) Response of mung bean to water-stress and irrigation at various growth-stages and plant densities: 2. Yield and yield components. Tropical Agriculture 71, 289-294.
19. Jones MM, Turner NC, Osmond CB (1981) Mechanisms of drought resistance. In 'The physiology and biochemistry of drought resistance in plants'. (Eds LG Paleg, D Aspinall) pp. 15-37. (Academic Press: New York)
20. Kumar A, Sharma KD (2009) Physiological responses and dry matter partitioning of summer mungbean (Vigna radiata L.) genotypes subjected to drought conditions. Journal of Agronomy & Crop Science 195, 270-277. doi:10.1111/j.1439-037X.2009.00373.x
21. Lambrides CJ, Godwin ID (2007) Mungbean. In 'Genome mapping and molecular breeding in plants'. (Ed. C Kole) pp. 69-90. (Springer-Verlag: Berlin)
22. Lawn RJ, Ahn CS (1985) Mung bean (Vigna radiata (L.) Wilczek/Vigna mungo (L.) Hepper). In 'Grain legume crops'. (Eds RJ Summerfield, EH Roberts) pp. 584-623. (Collins: London)
23. Likoswe AA, Lawn RJ (2008) Response to terminal water deficit stress of cowpea, pigeonpea and soybean in pure stand and in competition. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 59, 27-37. doi:10.1071/AR07155
24. Lizana C, Wentworth M, Martinez JP, Villegas D, Meneses R, Murchie EH, Pastenes C, Lercari B, Vernieri P, Horton P, Pinto M (2006) Differential adaptation of two varieties of common bean to abiotic stress - I. Effects of drought on yield and photosynthesis. Journal of Experimental Botany 57, 685-697. doi:10.1093/jxb/erj062
25. LudlowMM,MuchowRC(1990)Acritical evaluation of traits for improving crop yields in water-limited environments. Advances in Agronomy 43, 107-153. doi:10.1016/S0065-2113(08)60477-0
26. Munns R (1988) Why measure osmotic adjustment? Australian Journal of Plant Physiology 15, 717-726. doi:10.1071/PP9880717
27. Passouira JB (1977) Grain yield, harvest index and water use of wheat. Australian Journal of the Institute of Agricultural Science 43, 117-120.
28. Poehlman JM (1991) 'The mungbean.' (Westview Press: Boulder, CO)
29. Polak P, Yoder R (2006) Creating wealth from groundwater for dollar-a-day farmers: where the silent revolution and the four revolutions to end rural poverty meet. Hydrogeology Journal 14, 424-432. doi:10.1007/s10040-005-0011-2
30. Ragab R, Prudhomme C (2002) Climate change and water resources management in arid and semi-arid regions: prospective and challenges for the 21st century. Biosystems Engineering 81, 3-34. doi:10.1006/bioe.2001.0013 (Pubitemid 34635109)
31. Richards RA (2006) Physiological traits used in the breeding of new cultivars for water-scarce environments. Agricultural Water Management 80, 197-211. doi:10.1016/j.agwat.2005.07.013 (Pubitemid 43163194)
32. Ruuska SA, Rebetzke GJ, van Herwaarden AF, Richards RA, Fettell NA, Tabe L, Jenkins CLD (2006) Genotypic variation in water-soluble carbohydrate accumulation in wheat. Functional Plant Biology 33, 799-809. doi:10.1071/FP06062 (Pubitemid 44350575)
33. Senthong C, Pandey RK (1989) Response of five food legume crops to an irrigation gradient imposed during reproductive growth. Agronomy Journal 81, 680-686. doi:10.2134/agronj1989.00021962008100040024x
34. Shabala SN, Lew RR (2002) Turgor regulation in osmotically stressed Arabidopsis epidermal root cells. Direct support for the role of inorganic ion uptake as revealed by concurrent flux and cell turgor measurements. Plant Physiology 129, 290-299. doi:10.1104/pp.020005 (Pubitemid 34527327)
35. Sinclair TR, Hammer GL, van Oosterom EJ (2005) Potential yield and wateruse efficiency benefits in sorghum from limited maximum transpiration rate. Functional Plant Biology 32, 945-952. doi:10.1071/FP05047 (Pubitemid 41512873)
36. Smirnoff N, Cumbes QJ (1989) Hydroxyl radical scavenging activity of compatible solutes. Phytochemistry 28, 1057-1060. doi:10.1016/0031-9422(89) 80182-7
37. 2) fixation by white bean and soybean. Canadian Journal of Plant Science 68, 957-967.
38. Turner NC (2003) Drought resistance: a comparison of two research frameworks. In 'Management of agricultural drought: agronomic and genetic options'. (Ed. NP Saxena) pp. 89-102. (Science Publishers, Inc.: Enfield, NH)
39. TurnerNC(2004) Osmotic adjustment and osmoregulation. In 'Encyclopedia of plant and crop science'. (Ed. RM Goodman) pp. 850-853. (Marcel Drekker: New York)
40. TurnerNC,AbboS, Berger JD, Chaturvedi SK,French RJ,LudwigC,Mannur DM, Singh SJ, Yadava HS (2006) Osmotic adjustment in chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) results in no yield benefit under terminal drought. Journal of Experimental Botany 58, 187-194. doi:10.1093/jxb/erl192
41. Webber HA, Madramootoo CA, Bourgault M, Horst MG, Stulina G, Smith DL (2006) Water use efficiency of common bean and green gram grown using alternate furrow and deficit irrigation. Agricultural Water Management 86, 259-268. doi:10.1016/j.agwat.2006.05.012 (Pubitemid 44739185)
42. Xue GP, McIntyre CL, JenkinsCLD, Glassop D, van Herwaarden AF, Shorter R (2007) Molecular dissection of variation in carbohydrate metabolism related to water-soluble carbohydrate accumulation in stems of wheat. Plant Physiology 146, 441-454. doi:10.1104/pp.107.113076
43. Xue GP, McIntyre CL, Rattey AR, van Herwaarden AF, Shorter R (2009) Use of dry matter content as a rapid and low-cost estimate for ranking genotypic differences in water-soluble carbohydrate concentrations in the stem and leaf sheath of Triticum aestivum. Crop & Pasture Science 60, 51-59. doi:10.1071/CP08073