Differences in growth and water relations among Phaseolus vulgaris cultivars in response to induced drought stress

Environmental and Experimental Botany

Volumn 43, Issue 3, 2000, Pages 227-237

  Costa França, Marcel G ^a,b   Pham Thi, Anh Thu ^b   Pimentel, Carlos ^c   Pereyra Rossiello, Roberto O ^c   Zuily Fodil, Yasmine ^b   Laffray, Daniel ^a  

^a UNIVERSITÉ PARIS EST CRÉTEIL   (France)

^b UNIVERSITÉ PARIS DESCARTES   (France)

^c FEDERAL UNIVERSITY OF RIO DE JANEIRO   (Brazil)

Author keywords

Drought; Growth; Membrane damage; Net assimilation rate; Osmotic potential; Phaseolus vulgaris; Stomatal conductance

Indexed keywords

BRAZIL; CULTIVAR; DROUGHT RESISTANCE; GROWTH INHIBITION; GROWTH RATE; MEMBRANE POTENTIAL; OSMOTIC POTENTIAL; PLANT GROWTH; STOMA; STRESS TOLERANCE;

CULTIVAR; DROUGHT STRESS; GROWTH; WATER RELATIONS;

PHASEOLUS VULGARIS;

EID: 0343963685     PISSN: 00988472     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0098-8472(99)00060-X     Document Type: Article

References (42)

1. Barradas V.L., Jones H.G., Clark J.A. Stomatal responses to changing irradiance in Phaseolus vulgaris L. J. Exp. Bot. 45:1994;931-936.
2. Bergamaschi H., Vieira H.J., Ometto J.C., Angelocci L.R., Libardi P.L. Deficiência hídrica em feijoeiro. I. Análise de crescimento e fenologia. Pesq. Agropec. Bras. 23:1988;733-743.
3. Brestic M., Cornic G., Fryer M.J., Baker N.R. Does photorespiration protect the photosynthetic apparatus in French bean leaves from photoinhibition during drought stress? Planta. 196:1995;450-457.
4. 2 concentration (Ci) during drought and determination of minimum functional Ci. Plant Physiol. 111:1996;179-185.
5. Creelman R.A., Mason H.S., Bensen R.J., Boyer J.S., Mullet J.E. Water deficit and abscisic acid cause differential inhibition of shoot versus root growth in soybean seedlings. Analysis of growth, sugar accumulation, and gene expression. Plant Physiol. 92:1990;205-214.
6. Crowe J.H., Crowe L.M., Carpenter J.F., Rudolph A.S., Wistrom C.A., Spargo B.J., Anchordoguy T.J. Interactions of sugars with membranes. Arch. Biochem. Biophys. 947:1988;367-384.
7. Cruz de Carvalho M.H., Laffray D., Louguet P. Comparison of the physiological responses of Phaseolus vulgaris and Vigna unguiculata cultivars when submitted to drought conditions. Environ. Exp. Bot. 40:1998;197-207.
8. Donovan L.A., Ehleringer J.R. Potential for selection on plants for water-use efficiency as estimated by carbon isotope discrimination. Am. J. Bot. 81:1994;927-935.
9. Gomes, A.A., Pimentel, C., Araujo, A.P., Rossiello, R.O.P., 1999. Acumulação de biomassa e produção de grãos de quatro cultivares de feijoeiro sob dois regimes de irrigação. Pesq. Agropec. Bras., in press.
10. Graham P.H., Ranalli P. Common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L). Field Crops Res. 53:1997;131-146.
11. Haterlein A.J. Bean. Tearce T.P., Peet M.M. Crop Water Relations. 1983;157-185 Wiley, New York.
12. Hunt R. Plant Growth Analysis. (Studies in Biology, 96). 1978;Edward Arnold, London.
13. Krishnamani M.R.S., Yopp J.H., Myers O. Jr Leaf solute leakage as a drought tolerance indicator in soybean. Phyton (Argentina). 44:1984;43-49.
14. Levitt J. Responses of Plants to Environmental Stresses. Vol. II. Water, Radiation, Salt and Others Stresses. 1980;395-434 Academic Press, New York.
15. Ludlow M.M. Adaptive significance of stomatal responses to water stress. Turner N.C., Kramer P.J. Adaptation of Plants to Water and High Temperature Stress. 1980;123-138 Wiley, New York.
16. Mullet J.E., Whitsitt M.S. Plant cellular responses to water deficit. Plant Growth Regul. 20:1996;119-124.
17. Murray M.B., Cape J.N., Fowler D. Quantification of frost damage in plant tissues by rates of electrolyte leakage. New Phytol. 113:1989;307-311.
18. O'Toole J.C., Chang T.T. Drought resistance in cereals - rice: a case study. Munsell H., Staples R.C. Stress Physiology in Crop Plants. 1979;373-405 Wiley-Interscience, New York.
19. Oliver J.M. Desiccation tolerance in vegetative plant cells. Physiol. Plant. 97:1996;779-787.
20. Parkinson K.J. A simple method for determining the boundary layer resistance in leaf cuvettes. Plant Cell Environ. 8:1984;233-236.
21. Pham Thi A.T., Vieira da Silva J.B. Action d'un traitement osmotic sur l'ultrastructure des feuilles de cotonnier (Gossypium hirsutum L. et G. anomalum Waw et Peyr). C. R. Acad. Sci. Paris. 280:1975;2857-2860.
22. Pimentel, C., 1998. Metabolismo de Carbono na Agricultura Tropical. EDUR, Universidade Federal Rural do Rio de Janeiro, Seropédica - Rio de Janeiro.
23. Pimentel C., Jacob Neto J., Goi S.R., Pessanha G.G. Estresse hídrico em cultivares de Phaseolus vulgaris L. em simbiose com Rhizobium leguminosarus biovar phaseoli. Turrialba. 40:1990;520-526.
24. Premachandra G.S., Saneoka H., Ogata S. Cell membrane stability, an indication of drought tolerance, as effected by applied nitrogen in soybean. J. Agric. Sci. (Camb). 115:1990;63-66.
25. Premachandra G.S., Saneoka H., Fujita K., Ogata S. Osmotic adjustment and stomatal response to water deficits in maize. J. Exp. Bot. 43:1992;1451-1456.
26. Salinas A.R., Zelener N., Craviotto R.M., Bisaro V. Respuestas fisiológicas que caracterizam el comportamiento de diferentes cultivares de soja a la deficiência hidrica en el suelo. Pesq. Agropec. Bras. 31:1996;331-338.
27. Schobert B., Tschesche H. Unusual solution properties of proline and its interaction with proteins. Biochim. Biophys. Acta. 541:1978;270-277.
28. Scholander P.F., Hammel H.T., Bradstreet E.D., Hemmingsen E.A. Sap pressure in vascular plants. Science. 148:1965;339-346.
29. Schwab K.B., Gaff D.F. Sugar and ion content in leaf tissue of several drought tolerant plants under water stress. J. Plant Physiol. 125:1986;257-266.
30. Sharkey T.D., Badger M.R. Effects of water stress on photosynthetic electron transport, photophosphorylation and metabolite level of Xanthium strumarium cells. Planta. 156:1982;199-206.
31. Singh S.P. Patterns of variation in cultivated common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris, Fabaceae). Econ. Bot. 43:1989;39-57.
32. Steward C.R., Hanson A.D. Proline accumulation as a metabolic response to water stress. Turner N.C., Kramer P.J. Adaptation of Plant to Water and High Temperatures Stress. 1980;173-189 Wiley, New York.
33. Subbarao G.V., Johansen C., Slinkard A.E., Nageswara Rao R.C., Saxena N.P., Chanhan Y.S. Strategies for improving drought resistance in grain legumes. Crit. Rev. Plant Sci. 14:1995;469-523.
34. SYSTAT Version 5.0 Copyright, 1990-1992. SYSTAT, Inc.
35. Trejo C.L., Davies W.J. Drought-induced closure of Phaseolus vulgaris L. Stomata precedes leaf water deficit and any increase in xylem ABA concentration. J. Exp. Bot. 42:1991;1507-1515.
36. Turner N.C. Measurement and influence of environmental and plant factors on stomatal conductance in the field. Agric. For. Meteorol. 54:1991;137-154.
37. Turner N.C., Burch G.J. The role of water in plants. Teare I.D., Peet M.M. Crop Water Relationships. 1983;73-126 Wiley-Interscience, New York.
38. Turner N.C., Jones M.M. Turgor maintenance by osmotic adjustment of sorghum and sunflower crops in response to water and high temperature stress. Turner N.C., Kramer P.J. Adaptation of Plants to Water and High Temperature Stress. 1980;87-103 Wiley, New York.
39. Vasquez-Tello A., Zuily-Fodil Y., Pham Thi A.T., Vieira da Silva J.B. Electrolyte and Pi leakages and soluble sugar content as physiological tests for screening resistance to water stress in Phaseolus and Vigna species. J. Exp. Bot. 41:1990;827-832.
40. Von Caemmerer S., Farquhar G.D. Some relationships between the biochemistry of photosynthesis and the gas exchange of leaves. Planta. 153:1981;376-387.
41. 2 and water deficit effects on photosynthesis, ribulose bisphophate carboxylase-oxygenase, and carbohydrate metabolism in rice. Physiol. Plant. 103:1998;327-339.
42. Markhart A.H. Comparative water relations of Phaseolus vulgaris L. and Phaseolus acutifolius Gray. Plant Physiol. 77:1985;113-117.