Comparison of the physiological responses of Phaseolus vulgaris and Vigna unguiculata cultivars when submitted to drought conditions

Environmental and Experimental Botany

Volumn 40, Issue 3, 1998, Pages 197-207

  Cruz de Carvalho, Maria H ^a,b   Laffray, Daniel ^a   Louguet, Philippe ^a  

^a UNIVERSITÉ PARIS EST CRÉTEIL   (France)

^b UNIVERSITÉ PARIS DESCARTES   (France)

Author keywords

Drought; Net assimilation rate; Pennisetum americanum; Phaseolus vulgaris; Stomatal conductance; Vigna unguiculata

Indexed keywords

CARBON DIOXIDE FIXATION; CULTIVAR; DROUGHT RESISTANCE; GAS EXCHANGE; PHOTOSYNTHESIS; SCREENING;

PHASEOLUS VULGARIS; VIGNA UNGUICULATA;

EID: 0032446349     PISSN: 00988472     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0098-8472(98)00037-9     Document Type: Article

References (39)

1. Adams, M.W., Coyne, D.P., Davies, J.H.C., Graham, P.H., Francis, C.A., 1985. Common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.). In: Summerfield, R.J., Roberts, E.H. (Eds.), Grain Legume Crops. Collins, London, pp. 433-476.
2. Blackman P.G., Davies W.J. Root to shoot communication in maize plants and the effect of soil drying. J Exp Bot. 36:1985;39-48.
3. Blum A., Johnson J.W. Wheat cultivars respond differently to a drying top soil and a possible non-hydraulic root signal. J Exp Bot. 44:1993;1131-1139.
4. Chaves M.M. Effects of water deficits on carbon assimilation. J Exp Bot. 42:1991;1-16.
5. Chaves M.M., Pereira J.S. Water stress, carbon dioxide and climate change. J Exp Bot. 43:1992;1131-1139.
6. Davies W.J., Mansfield T.A., Hetherington A.M. Sensing for soil water status and the regulation of plant growth and development. Plant Cell Environ. 13:1990;709-719.
7. Davies W.J., Zhang J. Root signals and the regulation of growth development of plants in drying soil. Plant Physiol Plant Mol Biol. 42:1991;55-76.
8. Downton W.J.S., Loveys B.R., Grant W.J.R. Non uniform stomatal closure induced by water stress causes putative non stomatal inhibition of photo-synthesis. New Phytolog. 110:1988;503-509.
9. Gollan T., Turner N.C., Schulze E.D. The responses of stomata and leaf gas exchange to vapor pressure deficits and soil water content. III. In the sclerophyllous woody species Nerium oleander. Oecologia. 65:1986;356-362.
10. Kramer, P.J., 1969. Plant and Soil Relationships: A Modern Synthesis. McGraw-Hill Publishing Co., London.
11. Kramer P.J. Changing concepts regarding plant water relations. Plant Cell Environ. 11:1988;565-568.
12. Kuppers B.I.L., Kuppers M., Schulze E.D. Soil drying and its effect on leaf conductance and CO2 assimilation of Vigna unguiculata (L.) Walp. I The response to climate factors and to the rate of soil drying in young plants. Oecologia. 75:1988;99-104.
13. Laffray D., Louguet P. Stomatal responses and drought resistance. Bulletin de la Société Botanique de France. 137:1990;47-60.
14. Levitt, J., 1980. Responses of Plants to Environmental Stresses. Vol. II. Water, Radiation, Salt and Other Stresses. Academic Press, New York.
15. Ludlow M.M., Muchow R.C. A critical evaluation of traits for improving crop yield in water-limited environments. Adv Agronomy. 43:1990;107-153.
16. Markhart A.H. Comparative water relations of Phaseolus vulgaris L. and Phaseolus acutifolius Gray. Plant Physiol. 77:1985;113-117.
17. Maximov, N.A., 1929. In: Yapp, R.H. (Ed.), The Plant in Relation To Water - A Study of the Physiological Bases of Drought Resistance. Allen and Unwin, London.
18. Neales T.F., Masia A., Zhang J., Davies W.J. The effects of partially drying part of the root system of Helianthus annus on the abscisic acid content of the roots, xylem sap and leaves. J Exp Bot. 40:1989;1113-1120.
19. Parson L.R., Howe T.K. Effects of water stress on the water relations of Phaseolus vulgaris and the drought resistant Phaseolus acutifolius. Science. 60:1984;197-202.
20. Passioura J.B. The transport of water from soil to root in wheat seedlings. J Exp Bot. 31:1980;333-345.
21. Pham-Thi A.T., Vieira da Silva J., Mazliak P. The role of membrane lipids in drought resistance of plants. Bulletin de la Société Botanique de France. 137(1):1990;99-114.
22. Rachie, K.O., 1985. In: Singh, S.R., Rachie K.O. (Eds.), Cowpea Research, Production and Utilisation. John Wiley, New York.
23. Reppelin A., Laffray D., Daniel C., Braconnier S., Zuily-Fodil Y. Water relations and gas exchange in young coconut palm (Cocos nucifera L.) as influenced by water deficit. Can J Bot. 75:1997;18-27.
24. Ribaut J.M., Pilet P.E. Effects of water stress on growth, osmotic potential and abscisic acid content of maize roots. Physiolog Plantarum. 81:1991;156-162.
25. Richter H. Water relations of plants in the field: some comments on the measurements of selected parameters. J Exp Bot. 306:1997;1-7.
26. Roy-Macauley H., Zuily-Fodil Y., Kidric M., Pham Thi A.T., Vieira da Silva J. Effect of drought stress on proteolytic activities in Phaseolus and Vigna leaves from sensitive and resistant plants. Physiolog Plantarum. 85:1992;90-96.
27. Scholander P.F., Hammel H.T., Bradstreet E.D., Hemmingsen E.A. Sap pressure in vascular plants. Science. 148:1965;339-346.
28. Schurr, U., Gollan, T., 1990. Composition of xylem sap of plants experiencing root water stress: a descriptive study. In: Davies, W.J., Jeffcoat B. (Eds.), Importance of Root to Shoot Communication in the Response to Environmental Stress. Monographs of the British Society of Plant Growth Regulations, Vol. 21, pp. 201-214.
29. Shantz H.L. Drought resistance and soil moisture. Ecology. 8:1927;145-157.
30. Srivasta A., Strasser R.J. Stress and stress management of land plants during a regular day. J Plant Physiol. 148:1996;445-455.
31. Tardieu F., Zhang J., Davies W.J. What information is conveyed by ABA signal from maize roots in drying field soil? Plant Cell Environ. 15:1992;185-191.
32. Turk K.K., Hall A.E., Asbell C.W. Drought adaptation of cowpea. I. Influence of drought on seed yield. Agronomy J. 72:1980;413-420.
33. Vasquez-Tello A., Zuily-Fodil Y., Pham Thi A.T., Vieira da Silva J. Electrolyte and Pi leakages and soluble sugar content as physiological tests for screening resistance to water stress in Phaseolus and Vigna species. J Exp Bot. 228:1990;827-832.
34. Vieira da Silva, J.B., 1970. Recherches sur divers manifestations de la résistance à la sécheresse chez les cotonniers. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Paris.
35. Von Caemmerer S., Farquhar G.D. Some relationship between the biochemistry of photosynthesis and the gas exchange of leaves. Planta. 153:1981;376-387.
36. Weatherley P.E. Studies in the water relations of the cotton plant. I. The field measurement of water deficit in leaves. New Phytol. 49:1950;81-97.
37. Zhang J., Davies W.J. Increased synthesis of ABA in partially dehydrated root tips and ABA transport from roots to leaves. J Exp Bot. 38:1987;2015-2023.
38. Zuily-Fodil Y., Roy-Macauley H., Pham Thi A.T. Changes in proteolytic activities in response to water stress in Phaseolus and Vigna plants. Physiol Plantarum. 79:1990;A112.
39. Zuily-Fodil Y., Vazquez-Tello A., Vieira da Silva J. Effect of water deficit on cell permeability and on chloroplast integrity. Bulletin de la Société Botanique de France. 137:1990;115-123.