Does kin recognition and sib-mating avoidance limit the risk of genetic incompatibility in a parasitic wasp?

PLoS ONE

Volumn 5, Issue 10, 2010, Pages

  Metzger, Marie ^a,b   Bernstein, Carlos ^a   Hoffmeister, Thomas S ^b   Desouhant, Emmanuel ^a  

^a UNIVERSITÉ LYON 1   (France)

^b UNIVERSITY OF BREMEN   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ANIMAL BEHAVIOR; ANIMAL EXPERIMENT; ARTICLE; AVOIDANCE BEHAVIOR; CHEMICAL CUE; CONTROLLED STUDY; DECISION MAKING; FEMALE; GENETIC INCOMPATIBILITY; GENETIC RISK; MALE; MATE CHOICE; NONHUMAN; OLFACTORY DISCRIMINATION; SIBLING RELATION; VENTURIA CANESCENS; WASP; ALLELE; ANIMAL; GENETICS; PHYSIOLOGY; SEXUAL BEHAVIOR;

HYMENOPTERA; MEGASCOLIA FLAVIFRONS; VENTURIA CANESCENS; VESPOIDEA;

ALLELES; ANIMALS; FEMALE; MALE; SEXUAL BEHAVIOR, ANIMAL; WASPS;

EID: 78149417929     PISSN: None     EISSN: 19326203     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0013505     Document Type: Article

References (73)

1. Bateman AJ (1948) Intra-sexual selection in Drosophila. Heredity 2: 349-368.
2. Trivers RL (1972) Parental investment and sexual selection. In: Campbell BG, ed. Sexual selection and the descent of man 1871-1971. Chicago: Adine. Pp 136-179.
3. Møller AP, Jennions MD (2001) How important are direct fitness benefits of sexual selection? Naturwissenschaften 88: 401-415.
4. Andersson M (1994) Sexual selection. Princeton: Princeton University Press. 599 p.
5. Kokko H, Brooks R, McNamara JM, Houston AI (2002) The sexual selection continuum. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London Series B 269: 1331-1340.
6. Kokko H, Brooks R, Jennions MD, Morley J (2003) The evolution of mate choice and mating biases. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London Series B 270: 653-664.
7. Kokko H, Jennions MD, Brooks R (2006) Unifying and testing models of sexual selection. Annual Review of Ecology Evolution and Systematics 37: 43-66.
8. Mays HL, Hill GE (2004) Choosing mates: good genes versus genes that are a good fit. Trends in Ecology & Evolution 19: 554-559.
9. Neff BD, Pitcher TE (2005) Genetic quality and sexual selection: an integrated framework for good genes and compatible genes. Molecular Ecology 14: 19-38.
10. Hunt J, Bussiere LF, Jennions MD, Brooks R (2004) What is genetic quality? Trends in Ecology & Evolution 19: 329-333.
11. Zeh JA, Zeh DW (1996) The evolution of polyandry I: intragenomic conflict and genetic incompatibility. Proceedings: Biological Sciences 263: 1711-1717.
12. Brown JL (1997) A theory of mate choice based on heterozygosity. Behavioral Ecology 8: 60-65.
13. Tregenza T, Wedell N (2000) Genetic compatibility, mate choice and patterns of parentage. Molecular Ecology 9: 1013-1027.
14. Keller LF, Waller DM (2002) Inbreeding effects in wild populations. Trends in Ecology & Evolution 17: 230-241.
15. Charlesworth D, Charlesworth B (1987) Inbreeding depression and its evolutionary consequences. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 18: 237-268.
16. Lasalle J (1993) Hymenoptera and biodiversity. CAB International Wallingford: UK.
17. Henter HJ (2003) Inbreeding depression and haplodiploidy: Experimental measures in a parasitoid and comparisons across diploid and haplodiploid insect taxa. Evolution 57: 1793-1803.
18. Whiting PW (1943) Multiple alleles in complementary sex determination of habrobracon. Genetics 28: 365-382.
19. Cook JM, Crozier RH (1995) Sex determination and population biology in the Hymenoptera. Trends in Ecology & Evolution 10: 281-286.
20. Cook JM (1993) Sex determination in the Hymenoptera: a review of models and evidence. Heredity 71: 421-435.
21. Heimpel GE, de Boer JG (2008) Sex determination in the Hymenoptera. Annual Review of Entomology 53: 209-230.
22. Cowan DP, Stahlhut JK (2004) Functionally reproductive diploid and haploid males in an inbreeding hymenotperan with complementary sex determination. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the USA 101: 10374-10379.
23. Beukeboom LW (2001) Single-locus complementary sex determination in the ichneumonid Venturia canescens (Gravenhorst) (Hymenoptera). Netherlands Journal of Zoology 51: 1-15.
24. Salt G (1976) The hosts of Nemeritis canescens, a problem in the host specificity of insect parasitoids. Ecological Entomology 1: 63-67.
25. Metzger M, Fischbein D, Auguste A, Fauvergue X, Bernstein C, et al. (2010) Synergy in information use for mate finding: demonstration in a parasitoid wasp. Animal Behaviour 79: 1307-1315.
26. van Santen MCP, Schneider MV (2002) Courtship description in the solitary parasitoid wasp Venturia canescens (Hymenoptera). Proceedings of Experimental and Applied Entomology, NEV Amsterdam 13: 87-92.
27. Metzger M (2008) Rô le de l'information dans l'acquisition des partenaires sexuels et le choix du sexe de la descendance chez les hyme ́nopte'res parasitoi{dotless}̈des-Exemple de Venturia canescens Gravenhorst (Hymenoptera: Ichnemonidae). PhD thesis, Universite ́ Lyon 1: 213.
28. Ridley M (1993) Clutch size and mating frequency in parasitic Hymenoptera. American Naturalist 142: 893-910.
29. Amat I (2004) Coexistence de la reproduction sexue ́e et asexue ́e chez l'hyme ́nopte're parasitoi{dotless}̈de Venturia canescens: Aspects comportementaux et e ́cologiques. Lyon: Universite ́ Claude Bernard - Lyon 1: 226.
30. R Development Core Team (2009) R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. ViennaAustria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing.
31. Marris GC, Hubbard SF, Scrimgeour C (1996) The perception of genetic similarity by the solitary parthenogenetic parasitoid Venturia canescens, and its effects on the occurrence of superparasitism. Entomologia Experimentalis et Applicata 78: 167-174.
32. Pfennig DW, Reeve HK (1989) Neighbor recognition and context-dependent aggression in a solitary wasp, Sphecius speciosus (Hymenoptera, Sphecidae). Ethology 80: 1-18.
33. Pfennig DW, Reeve HK (1993) Nepotism in a solitary wasp as revealed by DNA fingerprinting. Evolution 47: 700-704.
34. Simmons LW (1989) Kin-recognition and its influence on mating preferences of the field cricket, Gryllus bimaculatus (de Geer). Animal Behaviour 37: 68-77.
35. Lihoreau M, Zimmer C, Rivault C (2007) Kin recognition and incest avoidance in a group-living insect. Behavioral Ecology 18: 880-887.
36. Smith BH, Ayasse M (1987) Kin-based male mating preferences in two species of halictine bee. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology 20: 313-318.
37. Keller L, Passera L (1993) Incest avoidance, fluctuating asymmetry, and the consequences of inbreeding in Iridomyrmex-humilis, an ant with multiple queen colonies. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology 33: 191-199.
38. Thurin N, Aron S (2009) Sib-mating in the ant Plagiolepis pygmaea: adaptative inbreeding? Journal of Evolutionary Biology 22: 2481-2487.
39. Shellman-Reeve JS (2001) Genetic relatedness and partner preference in a monogamous, wood-dwelling termite. Animal Behaviour 61: 869-876.
40. Whitehorn PR, Tinsley MC, Goulson D (2009) Kin recognition and inbreeding reluctance in bumblebees. Apidologie 40: 627-633.
41. Birkhead TR, Pizzari T (2002) Postcopulatory sexual selection. Nature Reviews Genetics 3: 262-273.
42. Murray TJ, Withers TM, Mansfield S (2009) Choice versus no-choice test interpretation and the role of biology and behavior in parasitoid host specificity tests. Biological Control 52: 153-159.
43. Howard RW, Blomquist GJ (2005) Ecological, behavioral, and biochemical aspects of insects hydrocarbons. Annual Review of Entomology 50: 371-393.
44. Simmons LW (1991) Female choice and the relatedness of mates in the field cricket, Gryllus bimaculatus. Animal Behaviour 41: 493-501.
45. Lihoreau M, Rivault C (2009) Kin recognition via cuticular hydrocarbons shapes cockroach social life. Behavioral Ecology 20: 46-53.
46. Sherman PW, Reeve HK, Pfennig DW (1997) Recognition systems. In: Krebs JR, Davies NB, eds. Behavioral Ecology An Evolutionary Approach Fourth Edition: Blackwell Science. pp 69-96.
47. Wyatt TD (2003) Pheromones and animal behaviour: communication by smell and taste. Cambridge, U.K. New York: Cambridge University Press.
48. Lize A, Cortesero AM, Bagneres AG, Poinsot D (2010) Kin recognition in the larvae of a solitary insect: the cue is in the plug. Behavioral Ecology 21: 633-638.
49. Ode PJ, Antolin MF, Strand MR (1995) Brood-mate avoidance in the parasitic wasp Bracon hebetor Say. Animal Behaviour 49: 1239-1248.
50. Waldman B (1988) The ecology of kin recognition. Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution and Systematics 19: 543-571.
51. Holmes WG (2004) The early history of Hamiltonian-based research on kin recognition. Annales Zoologici Fennici 41: 691-711.
52. Tang-Martinez Z (2001) The mechanisms of kin discrimination and the evolution of kin recognition in vertebrates: a critical re-evaluation. Behavioural Processes 53: 21-40.
53. Villavicencio CP, Marquez IN, Quispe R, Vasquez RA (2009) Familiarity and phenotypic similarity influence kin discrimination in the social rodent Octodon degus. Animal Behaviour 78: 377-384.
54. Alexander RD (1990) Epigenetic rules and darwinian algorithms. The adaptive study of learning and development. Ethology and Sociobiology 11: 241-303.
55. Mateo JM, Johnston RE (2000) Kin recognition and the 'armpit effect': evidence for self-referent phenotype matching. Proceedings of the Royal Society B 267: 695-700.
56. Petrie M, Krupa A, Burke T (1999) Peacocks lek with relatives even in the absence of social and environmental cues. Nature 401: 155-157.
57. Hauber ME, Sherman PW (2000) The armpit effect in hamster kin recognition. Trends in Ecology & Evolution 15: 349-350.
58. Enigl M, Schausberger P (2004) Mate choice in the predaceous mite Phytoseiulus persimilis: evidence of self-referent phenotype matching? Entomologia Experimentalis et Applicata 112: 21-28.
59. Ivy T, Weddle CB, Sakaluk SK (2005) Females use self-referent cues to avoid mating with previous mates. Proceedings of the Royal Society B 272: 2475-2478.
60. Lize A, Clement J, Cortesero AM, Poinsot D (2010) Kin recognition loss following anesthesia in beetle larvae (Aleochara bilineata, Coleoptera, Staphylinidae). Animal Cognition 13: 189-194.
61. Holmes WG, Sherman PW (1982) The ontogeny of kin recognition in two species of ground squirrels. American Naturalist 22: 491-517.
62. Bonduriansky R (2001) The evolution of male mate choice in insects: a synthesis of ideas and evidence. Biological Reviews 76: 305-339.
63. Bourdais D, Hance T (2009) Lack of behavioural evidence for kin avoidance in mate choice in a hymenopteran parasitoid (Hymenoptera: Braconidae). Behavioural Processes 81: 92-94.
64. van Wilgenburg E, Driessen G, Beukeboom LW (2006) Single locus complementary sex determination in Hymenoptera: an unintelligent design? Frontiers in Zoology 3.
65. de Boer JG, Ode PJ, Vet LEM, Whitfield JB, Heimpel GE (2007) Diploid males sire triploid daughters and sons in the parasitoid wasp Cotesia vestalis. Heredity 99: 288-294.
66. Zayed A, Packer L (2005) Complementary sex determination substantially increases extinction proneness of haplodiploid populations. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the USA 102: 10742-10746.
67. Hedrick PW, Gadau J, Page JRE (2006) Genetic sex determination and extinction. Trends in Ecology & Evolution 21: 55-57.
68. Hein S, Poethke HJ, Dorn S (2009) What stops the 'diploid male vortex'? A simulation study for species with single locus complementary sex determination. Ecological Modelling 220: 1663-1669.
69. Duchateau MJ, Marien J (1995) Sexual biology of haploid and diploid males in the bumble bee Bombus terrestris. Insectes Sociaux 42: 255-266.
70. Whitehorn PR, Tinsley MC, Brown MJF, Darvill B, Goulson D (2009) Impacts of inbreeding on bumblebee colony fitness under field conditions. BMC Evolutionary Biology 9: 152.
71. Pusey A, Wolf M (1996) Inbreeding avoidance in animals. Trends in Ecology & Evolution 11: 201-206.
72. Facon B, Ravigné V, Goudet J (2006) Experimental evidence of inbreeding avoidance in the hermaphroditic snail Physa acuta. Evolutionary Ecology 20: 395-406.
73. Fellowes MDE (1998) Do non-social insects get the (kin) recognition they deserve? Ecological Entomology 23: 223-227.