Females use self-referent cues to avoid mating with previous mates

Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences

Volumn 272, Issue 1580, 2005, Pages 2475-2478

  Ivy, Tracie M ^a   Weddle, Carie B ^a   Sakaluk, Scott K ^a  

^a ILLINOIS STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Cuticular hydrocarbons; Genetic benefits; Gryllodes sigillatus; Mate choice; Polyandry; Self referent matching

Indexed keywords

CHEMICAL CUE; CRICKET; FEMALE BEHAVIOR; MATE CHOICE; POLYANDRY;

ANIMAL EXPERIMENT; ARTICLE; COGNITION; FEMALE; GENETIC ANALYSIS; MALE; MATING; NONHUMAN; POLYANDRY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SEX DIFFERENCE; SPECIES DIFFERENCE; TAXONOMY;

ANIMALIA; GRYLLIDAE; GRYLLODES SIGILLATUS;

EID: 28244448510     PISSN: 09628452     EISSN: 14712970     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2005.3222     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. Adamo, S. A. & Hoy, R. R. 1994 Mating behaviour of the field cricket Gryllus bimaculatus and its dependence on social and environmental cues. Anim. Behav. 47, 857-868. (doi:10.1006/anbe.l994.1117.)
2. Archer, M. S. & Elgar, M. A. 1999 Female preference for multiple partners: sperm competition in the hide beetle, Dermestes maculatus (DeGeer). Anim. Behav. 58, 669-675. (doi:10.1006/anbe.l999.1172.)
3. Arnqvist, G. & Nilsson, T. 2000 The evolution of polyandry: multiple mating and female fitness in insects. Anim. Behav. 60, 145-164. (doi:10.1006/anbe.2000.1446.)
4. Bateman, P. W. 1998 Mate preference for novel partners in the cricket Gryllus bimaculatus. Ecol. Entomol. 23, 473-475. (doi:10.1046/j.1365-2311.1998. 00156.x.)
5. Bell, W. J. & Cardé, R. T. 1984. Chemical ecology of insects. Sunderland, MA: Sinauer Associates, Inc.
6. Blanckenhorn, W. U., Hosken, D. J., Martin, O. Y., Reim, C., Teuschl, Y. & Ward, P. I. 2002 The costs of copulating in the dung fly Sepsis cynipsea. Behav. Ecol. 13, 353-358. (doi:10.1093/beheco/13.3.353.)
7. Blows, M. W. 2002 Interaction between natural and sexual selection during the evolution of mate recognition. Proc. R. Soc. 8269, 1113-1118. (doi:10.1098/rspb.2002.2002.)
8. Daly, M. 1978 The cost of mating. Am. Nat. 138, 771-774. (doi:10.1086/283319.)
9. Dawkins, R. 1982. The extended phenotype. Oxford: W. H. Freeman and Co.
10. Eakley, A. L. & Houde, A. E. 2004 Possible role of female discrimination against 'redundant' males in the evolution of colour pattern polymorphism in guppies. Proc. R. Soc. B 271(suppl.), S299-S301.
11. Fox, C. W. & Rauter, C. M. 2003 Bet-hedging and the evolution of multiple mating. Evol. Ecol. Res. 5, 273-286.
12. Hauber, M. E. & Sherman, P. W. 2001 Self-referent phenotype matching: theoretical considerations and empirical evidence. Trends Neurosci. 24, 609-616. (doi:10.1016/S0166-2236(00)01916-0.)
13. Hurst, G. D. D., Sharpe, R. G., Broomfield, A. H., Walker, L. E., Majerus, T. M. O., Zakharov, I. A. & Majerus, M. E. N. 1995 Sexually transmitted disease in a promiscuous insect, Adalia bipunctata. Ecol. Entomol. 20, 230-236.
14. Ivy, T. M. & Sakaluk, S. K. 2005 Polyandry promotes enhanced offspring survival in decorated crickets. Evolution 59, 152-159.
15. Jennions, M. D. & Petrie, M. 2000 Why do females mate multiply? Biol. Rev. 75, 21-64. (doi: 10.1017/ S0006323199005423.)
16. Mateo, J. M. & Johnston, R. E. 2000 Kin recognition and the 'armpit effect': evidence of self-referent phenotype matching. Proc. R. Soc. B 267, 695-700. (doi:10.1098/rspb. 2000.1058.)
17. Otte, D. & Cade, W. 1976 On the role of olfaction in sexual and interspecies recognition in crickets (Acheta and Gryllus). Anim. Behav. 24, 1-6.
18. Philippi, T. & Seger, J. 1989 Hedging one's evolutionary bets, revisited. Trends Ecol. Evol 4,41-44. (doi: 10.1016/01695347(89)90138-9.)
19. Polerstock, A. R., Eigenbrode, S. D. & Klowden, M. J. 2002 Mating alters the cuticular hydrocarbons of female Anopheles gambiae sensu sticto and Aedes aegypti (Diptera: Culicidae). J. Med. Entomol. 39, 545-552.
20. Sakaluk, S. K., Schaus, J. M., Eggert, A.-K., Snedden, W. A. & Brady, P. L. 2002 Polyandry and fitness of offspring reared under varying nutritional stress in decorated crickets. Evolution 56, 1999-2007.
21. Simmons, L. W. 1990 Pheromonal cues for the recognition of kin by female field crickets, Gryllus bimaculatus. Anim. Behav. 40, 192-195.
22. Stockley, P. 1999 Sperm selection and genetic incompatibility: does relatedness of mates affect male success in sperm competition? Proc. R. Soc. B 266, 1663-1669. (doi: 10.1098/rspb. 1999.0829.)
23. Tarpy, D. R. 2003 Genetic diversity within honeybee colonies prevents severe infections and promotes colony growth. Proc. R. Soc. B 270, 99-103. (doi:10.1098/rspb.2002. 2199.)
24. Tregenza, T. & Wedell, N. 1997 Definitive evidence for cuticular hydrocarbons in a cricket. Anim. Behav. 54, 979-984. (doi:10.1006/anbe.l997. 0500.)
25. Tregenza, T. & Wedell, N. 2000 Genetic compatibility, mate choice and patterns of parentage: invited review. Mol. Ecol. 9, 1013-1027. (doi:10.1046/j.l365-294x.2000.00964.x.)
26. Tregenza, T. & Wedell, N. 2002 Polyandrous females avoid costs of inbreeding. Nature 415, 71-73. (doi:10.1038/ 415071a.)
27. Zeh, J. A. & Zeh, D. W. 2003 Toward a new sexual selection paradigm: polyandry, conflict, and incompatibility. Ethology 109, 929-950. (doi:10.1046/j.1439-0310.2003. 00945.x.)
28. Zeh, J. A., Newcomer, S. D. & Zeh, D. W. 1998 PolyandNatlrous females discriminate against previous mates. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 95, 13 732-13 736. (doi:10.1073/pnas.95. 23.13732.)