Disruptive effect of amphetamines on Pavlovian to instrumental transfer

Behavioural Brain Research

Volumn 216, Issue 1, 2011, Pages 440-445

  Hall, Darien A ^a,b   Gulley, Joshua M ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT URBANA CHAMPAIGN   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

Author keywords

Addiction; Amphetamine; Incentive motivation; Incentive salience; Methamphetamine; Pavlovian instrumental transfer; PIT; Reward

Indexed keywords

AMPHETAMINE; METHAMPHETAMINE; SODIUM CHLORIDE;

ANIMAL EXPERIMENT; ARTICLE; BEHAVIOR; CONDITIONING; CONTROLLED STUDY; HYPOTHESIS; MALE; MEMORY CONSOLIDATION; NONHUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RAT; REWARD; SPRAGUE DAWLEY RAT; STIMULUS; TASK PERFORMANCE;

AMPHETAMINE; ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; ANIMALS; ASSOCIATION LEARNING; CENTRAL NERVOUS SYSTEM STIMULANTS; CONDITIONING, CLASSICAL; CONDITIONING, OPERANT; MALE; METHAMPHETAMINE; RATS; RATS, SPRAGUE-DAWLEY; REWARD; TRANSFER (PSYCHOLOGY);

EID: 78149406328     PISSN: 01664328     EISSN: 18727549     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.bbr.2010.08.040     Document Type: Article

References (53)

1. Balleine B.W., Ostlund S.B. Still at the choice-point: action selection and initiation in instrumental conditioning. Ann N Y Acad Sci 2007, 1104:147-171.
2. Balster R.L., Schuster C.R. A comparison of d-amphetamine, l-amphetamine, and methamphetamine self-administration in rhesus monkeys. Pharmacol Biochem Behav 1973, 1:67-71.
3. Blaiss C.A., Janak P.H. Post-training, but not post-reactivation, administration of amphetamine and anisomycin modulates Pavlovian conditioned approach. Neurobiol Learn Mem 2007, 87:644-658.
4. Blundell P., Hall G., Killcross S. Lesions of the basolateral amygdala disrupt selective aspects of reinforcer representation in rats. J Neurosci 2001, 21:9018-9026.
5. Cardinal R.N., Everitt B.J. Neural and psychological mechanisms underlying appetitive learning: links to drug addiction. Curr Opin Neurobiol 2004, 14:156-162.
6. Childress A.R., Mozley P.D., McElgin W., Fitzgerald J., Reivich M., O'Brien C.P. Limbic activation during cue-induced cocaine craving. Am J Psychiatry 1999, 156:11-18.
7. Colliver J.D., Kroutil L.A., Dai L., Gfroerer J.C. Misuse of Prescription Drugs: Data from the 2002, 2003, and 2004 National Surveys on Drug Use and Health 2006, Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration, Office of Applied Studies, Rockville, MD.
8. Colwill R.M., Rescorla R.A. Associations between the discriminative stimulus and the reinforcer in instrumental learning. J Exp Psychol: Anim Behav Processes 1988, 14:155-164.
9. Corbit L.H., Janak P.H. Inactivation of the lateral but not medial dorsal striatum eliminates the excitatory impact of Pavlovian stimuli on instrumental responding. J Neurosci 2007, 27:13977-13981.
10. Corbit L.H., Balleine B.W. Double dissociation of basolateral and central amygdala lesions on the general and outcome-specific forms of Pavlovian-instrumental transfer. J Neurosci 2005, 25:962.
11. Corbit L.H., Janak P.H., Balleine B.W. General and outcome-specific forms of Pavlovian-instrumental transfer: the effect of shifts in motivational state and inactivation of the ventral tegmental area. Eur J Neurosci 2007, 26:3141-3149.
12. Corbit L.H., Muir J.L., Balleine B.W. The role of the nucleus accumbens in instrumental conditioning: evidence of a functional dissociation between accumbens core and shell. J Neurosci 2001, 21:3251-3260.
13. Crombag H.S., Galarce E.M., Holland P.C. Pavlovian influences on goal-directed behavior in mice: the role of cue-reinforcer relations. Learn Mem 2008, 15:299-303.
14. de Wit H., Stewart J. Reinstatement of cocaine-reinforced responding in the rat. Psychopharmacology (Berl) 1981, 75:134-143.
15. Delamater A.R., Oakeshott S. Learning about multiple attributes of reward in Pavlovian conditioning. Ann N Y Acad Sci 2007, 1104:1-20.
16. El-Amamy H., Holland P.C. Dissociable effects of disconnecting amygdala central nucleus from the ventral tegmental area or substantia nigra on learned orienting and incentive motivation. Eur J Neurosci 2007, 25:1557-1567.
17. Estes W.K. Discriminative conditioning; effects of a Pavlovian conditioned stimulus upon a subsequently established operant response. J Exp Psychol 1948, 38:173-177.
18. Feldman R.S., Meyer J.S., Quenzer L.F. Stimulants: amphetamine and cocaine. Principles of Neuropsychopharmacology 1997, Sinauer, Sunderland, MA, p. 20.
19. Field M., Cox W.M. Attentional bias in addictive behaviors: a review of its development, causes, and consequences. Drug Alcohol Depend 2008, 97:1-20.
20. Garavan H., Pankiewicz J., Bloom A., Cho J.K., Sperry L., Ross T.J., et al. Cue-induced cocaine craving: neuroanatomical specificity for drug users and drug stimuli. Am J Psychiatry 2000, 157:1789-1798.
21. Goldstein R.Z., Volkow N.D. Drug addiction and its underlying neurobiological basis: neuroimaging evidence for the involvement of the frontal cortex. Am J Psychiatry 2002, 159:1642-1652.
22. Hall D.A., Stanis J.J., Marquez Avila H., Gulley J.M. A comparison of amphetamine- and methamphetamine-induced locomotor activity in rats: evidence for qualitative differences in behavior. Psychopharmacology (Berl) 2008, 195:469-478.
23. Hall J., Parkinson J.A., Connor T.M., Dickinson A., Everitt B.J. Involvement of the central nucleus of the amygdala and nucleus accumbens core in mediating Pavlovian influences on instrumental behaviour. Eur J Neurosci 2001, 13:1984-1992.
24. Holland P.C., Gallagher M. Double dissociation of the effects of lesions of basolateral and central amygdala on conditioned stimulus-potentiated feeding and Pavlovian-instrumental transfer. Eur J Neurosci 2003, 17:1680-1694.
25. Holmes N.M., Marchand A.R., Coutureau E. Pavlovian to instrumental transfer: a neurobehavioural perspective. Neurosci Biobehav Rev 2010.
26. Homayoun H., Moghaddam B. Differential representation of Pavlovian-instrumental transfer by prefrontal cortex subregions and striatum. Eur J Neurosci 2009, 29:1461-1476.
27. Kuhn D.M., Appel J.B., Greenberg I. An analysis of some discriminative properties of d-amphetamine. Psychopharmacology 1974, 39:66-166.
28. Lamb R.J., Henningfield J.E. Human d-amphetamine drug discrimination: methamphetamine and hydromorphone. J Exp Anal Behav 1994, 61:169-180.
29. Lee J.L., Everitt B.J. Reactivation-dependent amnesia in Pavlovian approach and instrumental transfer. Learn Mem 2008, 15:597-602.
30. Lex A., Hauber W. Dopamine D1 and D2 receptors in the nucleus accumbens core and shell mediate Pavlovian-instrumental transfer. Learn Mem 2008, 15:483-491.
31. Lovibond P.F. Facilitation of instrumental behavior by a Pavlovian appetitive conditioned stimulus. J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process 1983, 9:225-247.
32. Maas L.C., Lukas S.E., Kaufman M.J., Weiss R.D., Daniels S.L., Rogers V.W., et al. Functional magnetic resonance imaging of human brain activation during cue-induced cocaine craving. Am J Psychiatry 1998, 155:124-126.
33. Melega W., Williams A., Schmitz D., DiStefano E., Cho A. Pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic analysis of the actions of d-amphetamine and d-methamphetamine on the dopamine terminal. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 1995, 274:90-96.
34. Milesi-Hallé A., McMillan D.E., Laurenzana E.M., Byrnes-Blake K.A., Owens S.M. Sex differences in (+)-amphetamine- and (+)-methamphetamine-induced behavioral response in male and female Sprague-Dawley rats. Pharmacol Biochem Behav 2007, 86:140-149.
35. Murschall A., Hauber W. Inactivation of the ventral tegmental area abolished the general excitatory influence of Pavlovian cues on instrumental performance. Learn Mem 2006, 13:123-126.
36. NIDA Research Report. Methamphetamine Abuse and Addiction. NIH Publication no. 06-4210, 1-8; 2006.
37. Paulson P.E., Robinson T.E Regional differences in the effects of amphetamine withdrawal on dopamine dynamics in the striatum. Analysis of circadian patterns using automated on-line microdialysis. Neuropsychopharmacology 1996, 14:325-337.
38. Pecina S., Schulkin J., Berridge K.C. Nucleus accumbens corticotropin-releasing factor increases cue-triggered motivation for sucrose reward: paradoxical positive incentive effects in stress?. BMC Biol 2006, 4-8.
39. Robinson T.E., Berridge K.C. The neural basis of drug craving: an incentive-sensitization theory of addiction. Brain Res Brain Res Rev 1993, 18:247-291.
40. Segal D.S., Kuczenski R. Repeated binge exposures to amphetamine and methamphetamine: behavioral and neurochemical characterization. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 1997, 282:561-573.
41. Segal D.S., Kuczenski R. In vivo microdialysis reveals a diminished amphetamine-induced DA response corresponding to behavioral sensitization produced by repeated amphetamine pretreatment. Brain Res 1992, 571:330-337.
42. Shoblock J.R., Sullivan E.B., Maisonneuve I.M., Glick S.D. Neurochemical and behavioral differences between d-methamphetamine and d-amphetamine in rats. Psychopharmacology (Berl) 2003, 165:359-369.
43. Simon N.W., Mendez I.A., Setlow B Effects of prior amphetamine exposure on approach strategy in appetitive Pavlovian conditioning in rats. Psychopharmacology (Berl) 2009, 202:699-709.
44. Simon N.W., Setlow B. Post-training amphetamine administration enhances memory consolidation in appetitive Pavlovian conditioning: implications for drug addiction. Neurobiol Learn Mem 2006, 86:305-310.
45. Taylor J.R., Olausson P., Quinn J.J., Torregrossa M.M. Targeting extinction and reconsolidation mechanisms to combat the impact of drug cues on addiction. Neuropharmacology 2009, 56(Suppl. 1):186-195.
46. van den Bos R., van der Harst J., Vijftigschild N., Spruijt B., van Luijtelaar G., Maes R. On the relationship between anticipatory behaviour in a Pavlovian paradigm and Pavlovian-to-instrumental transfer in rats (Rattus norvegicus). Behav Brain Res 2004, 153:397-408.
47. Vanderschuren L.J., Schmidt E.D., De Vries T.J., Van Moorsel C.A., Tilders F.J., Schoffelmeer A.N. A single exposure to amphetamine is sufficient to induce long-term behavioral, neuroendocrine, and neurochemical sensitization in rats. J Neurosci 1999, 19:9579-9586.
48. Volkow N.D., Wang G.J., Telang F., Fowler J.S., Logan J., Childress A.R., et al. Cocaine cues and dopamine in dorsal striatum: mechanism of craving in cocaine addiction. J Neurosci 2006, 26:6583-6588.
49. Wang G.J., Volkow N.D., Fowler J.S., Cervany P., Hitzemann R.J., Pappas N.R., et al. Regional brain metabolic activation during craving elicited by recall of previous drug experiences. Life Sci 1999, 64:775-784.
50. Wong D.F., Kuwabara H., Schretlen D.J., Bonson K.R., Zhou Y., Nandi A., et al. Increased occupancy of dopamine receptors in human striatum during cue-elicited cocaine craving. Neuropsychopharmacology 2006, 31:2716-2727.
51. Wyvell C.L., Berridge K.C. Incentive sensitization by previous amphetamine exposure: increased cue-triggered " wanting" for sucrose reward. J Neurosci 2001, 21:7831-7840.
52. Wyvell C.L., Berridge K.C. Intra-accumbens amphetamine increases the conditioned incentive salience of sucrose reward: enhancement of reward " wanting" without enhanced " liking" or response reinforcement. J Neurosci 2000, 20:8122-8130.
53. Yokel R.A., Pickens R. Self-administration of optical isomers of amphetamine and methylamphetamine by rats. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 1973, 187:27-33.