Judging research in teacher education

Journal of Teacher Education

Volumn 61, Issue 4, 2010, Pages 295-301

  Lin, Emily ^a   Wang, Jian ^a   Klecka, Cari L ^a   Odell, Sandra J ^a   Spalding, Elizabeth ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NEVADA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 78149385305     PISSN: 00224871     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/0022487110374013     Document Type: Editorial

References (43)

1. Beattie, M. (1995). New prospects for teacher education: Narrative ways of knowing teaching and teacher learning. Educational Researcher, 37(1), 53-70.
2. Berliner, D. (2002). Educational research: The hardest science of all. Educational Researcher, 31(8), 18-20.
3. Boaler, J. (2008). When politics took the place of inquiry: A response to National Mathematics Advisory Panel's review of instructional practices. Educational Researcher, 39(9), 588-594. 10.3102/0013189X08327998.
4. Boote, D. (2008). Notes toward a naturalistic study of education research methodology. Interchange, 39(3), 303-325. doi:10.1007/ s10780-008-9068-x.
5. Borko, H., Liston, D., & Whitcomb, J. (2007). Genres of empirical research in teacher education. Journal of Teacher Education, 58(1), 3-11.
6. Borko, H., & Whitcomb, J. (2008). Teachers, teaching, and teacher education: Comments on the National Mathematics Advisory Panel's Report. Educational Researcher, 37(9), 565-572. 10.3102/0013189X08328877.
7. Brophy, J., & Good, T. (1986). Teacher behavior and student achievement. In M. Wittrock (Ed.), Handbook of research on teaching (pp. 328-375). New York, NY: Macmillan.
8. Carter, K. (1992). The place of story in the study of teaching and teacher education. Educational Researcher, 22(1), 5-12.
9. Cobb, P., & Jackson, K. (2008). The consequences of experimentalism in formulating recommendations for policy and practice in mathematics education. Educational Researcher, 39(9), 573-581. doi:10.3102/0013189X08327826.
10. Cochran-Smith, M. (2001). Constructing outcomes in teacher education: Policy, practice and pitfalls. Education Policy Analysis, 9(11), 1068-2341.
11. Cochran-Smith, M., & Fries, M. (2005). The AERA Panel on Research and Teacher Education: Context and goals. In M. Cochran-Smith & K. Zeichner (Eds.), Studying teacher education: The report of the AERA Panel on Research and Teacher Education (pp. 37-68). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
12. Cochran-Smith, M., & Zeichner, K. (Eds.). (2005). Studying teacher education: The report of the AERA Panel on Research and Teacher Education. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
13. Doyle, W. (1977). Paradigms for research on teacher effectiveness. Review of Research in Education, 5, 163-198.
14. Dunkin, M.J., & Biddle, B.J. (1974). The study of teaching. New York, NY: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.
15. Erickson, F., & Gutierrez, K. (2002). Culture, rigor, and science in educational research. Educational Researcher, 31(8), 21-24.
16. Feuer, M.J., Towne, L., & Shavelson, R. (2002). Scientific research and educational research. Educational Researcher, 31(8), 4-14.
17. Floden, R.E. (1985). The role of rhetoric in changing teachers' beliefs. Teaching and Teacher Education, 1(1), 19-32.
18. Greeno, J.G., & Collins, A. (2008). Commentary on the final report of the National Mathematics Advisory Panel. Educational Researcher, 39(9), 618-623. doi:10.3102/0013189X08327997.
19. Grossman, P. (2008). Responding to our critics: From crisis to opportunity in research on teacher education. Journal of Teacher Education, 59(10), 10-23. doi:10.1177/0022487107310748.
20. Hodson, D. (2008). Towards scientific literacy: A teacher's guide to the history, philosophy and sociology of science. Rotterdam, Netherlands: Sense.
21. Johnson, R.B. (2009). Toward a more inclusive scientific research in education. Educational Researcher, 38(6), 449-457. doi:10.3102/0013189X09344429.
22. Kaestle, C.F. (1993). The awful reputation of educational research. Educational Researcher, 22(1), 26-31.
23. Kuhn, T.S. (1970). The structure of scientific revolutions (2nd ed.). Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
24. Labaree, D. (1998). Educational researchers: Living with a lesser form of knowledge. Educational Researcher, 27(8), 4-12.
25. Levine, A. (2007). Educating researchers. Washington, DC: Education Schools Project.
26. Lobato, J. (2008). On learning processes and the National Mathematics Advisory Panel report. Educational Researcher, 39(9), 595-601. doi:10.3102/0013189X08327999.
27. McDonald, F., & Elias, P. (1976). The effects of teacher performance on pupil learning: Beginning teacher evaluation study: Phase II, final report (Vol. 1). Princeton, NJ: Educational Testing Service.
28. Moss, P.A., Pellegrino, J.W., Schneider, B.L., Duran, R.P., Eisenhart, M.A., Erickson, F.D.,. . . Levine, F.J. (2006). Standards for reporting on empirical social science research in AERA publications: American Educational Research Association. Educational Researcher, 35(6), 33-40.
29. National Mathematics Advisory Panel. (2008). Foundations for success: The final report of the National Mathematics Advisory Panel. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education.
30. National Research Council. (2002). Scientific research in education (R. J. Shavelson & L. Towne, Eds.). Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
31. No Child Left Behind Act, Pub. L. No. 107-110, 115 Stat. 1425 (2002).
32. Putnam, R.T., & Borko, H. (2000). What do new views of knowledge and thinking have to say about research on teacher learning? Educational Researcher, 29(1), 4-15.
33. Shepard, L. (2008). Commentary on the National Mathematics Advisory Panel recommendations on assessment. Educational Researcher, 39(9), 602-609. doi:10.3102/0013189X08328001.
34. Shulman, L.S. (1986). Paradigms and research programs in the study of teaching. In M. Wittrock (Ed.), Handbook of research on teaching (pp.1-36). New York, NY: Macmillan.
35. Sloane, F.C. (2008). Randomized trials in mathematics education: Recalibrating the proposed high watermark. Educational Researcher, 39(9), 624-630. doi:10.3102/0013189X08328879.
36. Strauss, S. (2005). Teaching as a natural cognitive ability: Implications for classroom practice and teacher education. In D. Pillemer and S. White (Eds.), Developmental psychology and social change (pp. 368-388). New York: Cambridge University Press.
37. Sykes, G., & Bird, T. (1992). Ch. 10 Teacher education and the case idea. In G. Grant (Ed.), Review of research in education (Vol. 18, pp. 457-521). Washington, DC: American Educational Research Association. doi: 10.3102/0091732X018001457.
38. Thompson, P.W. (2008). On professional judgment and the National Mathematics Advisory Panel report: Curricular content. Educational Researcher, 39(9), 582-587. doi:10.3102/ 0013189X08328000.
39. U.S. Department of Education, Office of Policy Planning and Innovation. (2003). Meeting the highly qualified teachers challenge: The secretary's second annual report on teacher quality. Washington, DC: Author.
40. Weber, S. (1993). The narrative anecdote in teacher education. Journal of Education for Teaching, 19(1), 71-82.
41. Wilson, S.M., Floden, R.E., & Ferrini-Mundy, J. (2001). Teacher preparation research: Current knowledge, gaps, and recommendations. Seattle, WA: Center for the Study of Teaching and Policy.
42. Zeichner, K.M. (1999). The new scholarship in teacher education. Educational Researcher, 28(9), 4-15.
43. Zeichner, K. (2005). A research agenda for teacher education. In M. Cochran-Smith & K. Zeichner (Eds.), Studying teacher education: The report of the AERA Panel on Research and Teacher Education (pp. 737-759). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.