Extracting concealed information from groups

Journal of Forensic Sciences

Volumn 55, Issue 6, 2010, Pages 1607-1609

  Meijer, Ewout H ^a   Smulders, Fren T Y ^a   Merckelbach, Harald L G J ^a  

^a MAASTRICHT UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

CIT; Concealed information test; Forensic science; Guilty Knowledge Test; Lie detection; Network analysis; Polygraph; Terrorism

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; ARTICLE; CROWDING; DECEPTION; ELECTRODERMAL RESPONSE; FORENSIC MEDICINE; FORENSIC PSYCHIATRY; HUMAN; MALE;

ADULT; ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; DECEPTION; FORENSIC PSYCHIATRY; GALVANIC SKIN RESPONSE; HUMANS; LIE DETECTION; MALE; MASS BEHAVIOR;

EID: 78149342459     PISSN: 00221198     EISSN: 15564029     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1556-4029.2010.01474.x     Document Type: Article

References (11)

1. Lykken DT. The GSR in the detection of guilt. J Appl Psychol 1959;43:385-8.
2. Lykken DT. A tremor in the blood. New York, NY: Plenum Press, 1998.
3. Verschuere B, Crombez G, De Clercq A, Koster EH. Autonomic and behavioral responding to concealed information: differentiating orienting and defensive responses. Psychophysiology 2004;41:461-6.
4. Ben-Shakhar G, Elaad E. The validity of psychophysiological detection of information with the Guilty Knowledge Test: a meta-analytic review. J Appl Psychol 2003;88:131-51.
5. Hira S, Furumitsu I. Polygraphic examinations in Japan: application of the guilty knowledge test in forensic investigations. Int J Police Sci Manag 2002;4:16-27.
6. Nakayama M. Practical use of the concealed information test for criminal investigation in Japan. In: Kleiner M, editor. Handbook of polygraph testing. San Diego, CA: Academic Press, 2002;49-86.
7. Raskin DC. Polygraph techniques for the detection of deception. In: Raskin DC, editor. Psychological methods in criminal investigation and evidence. New York, NY: Springer, 1989;247-96.
8. Williams EJ. Experimental designs balanced for the estimation of residual effects of treatments. Aust J Sci Res 1949;2:149-68.
9. Ben-Shakhar G. Standardization within individuals: a simple method to neutralize individual differences in skin conductance. Psychophysiology 1985;22:292-9.
10. Meijer EH, Smulders FTY, Johnston JE, Merckelbach HLGJ. Combining skin conductance and forced choice in the detection of deception. Psychophysiology 2007;44:814-22.
11. Borgatti SP, Mehra A, Brass DJ, Labianca G. Network analysis in the social Sciences. Science 2009;323:892-5.