Characterizing early contrast uptake of ductal carcinoma in situ with high temporal resolution dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI of the breast: A pilot study

Physics in Medicine and Biology

Volumn 55, Issue 19, 2010, Pages

  Jansen, S A ^a,b   Fan, X ^a   Medved, M ^a   Abe, H ^a   Shimauchi, A ^a   Yang, C ^a   Zamora, M ^a   Foxley, S ^a   Olopade, O I ^a   Karczmar, G S ^a   Newstead, G M ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO   (United States)

^b Institut national du cancer du Canada   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CONTRAST MEDIUM; DIAGNOSTIC AGENT;

ADULT; ARTICLE; BREAST TUMOR; HUMAN; INJECTION; KINETICS; METABOLISM; MIDDLE AGED; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; PAGET NIPPLE DISEASE; PATHOLOGY; PILOT STUDY; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY; TRANSPORT AT THE CELLULAR LEVEL;

ADULT; BIOLOGICAL TRANSPORT; BREAST NEOPLASMS; CARCINOMA, DUCTAL, BREAST; CONTRAST MEDIA; HUMANS; INJECTIONS; KINETICS; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; MIDDLE AGED; PILOT PROJECTS; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES;

EID: 78149319483     PISSN: 00319155     EISSN: 13616560     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1088/0031-9155/55/19/N02     Document Type: Article

References (45)

1. Allegra C J et al 2009 National Institutes of Health State-of-the-Science Conference statement: diagnosis and management of ductal carcinoma in situ September 22-24, 2009 JNCI J. Natl. Cancer Inst. 102 161-9
2. Bluemke D A et al 2004 Magnetic resonance imaging of the breast prior to biopsy JAMA 292 2735-42
3. Boetes C, Barentsz J O, Mus R D, Van der Sluis R F, van Erning L J, Hendriks J H, Holland R and Ruys S H 1994 MR characterization of suspicious breast lesions with a gadolinium-enhanced TurboFLASH subtraction technique Radiology 193 777-81
4. Boetes C, Strijk S P, Holland R, Barentsz J O, Van der Sluis R F and Ruijs J H 1997 False-negative MR imaging of malignant breast tumors Eur. Radiol. 7 1231-4
5. Eng J 2005 Receiver operating characteristic analysis: a primer Acad. Radiol. 12 909-16
6. Erbas B, Provenzano E, Armes J and Gertig D 2006 The natural history of ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast: a review Breast Cancer Res. Treat. 97 135-44
7. Esserman L J et al 2006 Magnetic resonance imaging captures the biology of ductal carcinoma in situ J. Clin. Oncol. 24 4603-10
8. Facius M, Renz D M, Neubauer H, Bottcher J, Gajda M, Camara O and Kaiser W A 2007 Characteristics of ductal carcinoma in situ in magnetic resonance imaging Clin. Imaging 31 394-400
9. Fan X, Medved M, Karczmar G S, Yang C, Foxley S, Arkani S, Recant W, Zamora M A, Abe H and Newstead G M 2007 Diagnosis of suspicious breast lesions using an empirical mathematical model for dynamic contrastenhanced MRI Magn. Reson. Imaging 25 593-603
10. Fan X, Medved M, River J N, Zamora M, Corot C, Robert P, Bourrinet P, Lipton M, Culp R M and Karczmar G S 2004 New model for analysis of dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI data distinguishes metastatic from nonmetastatic transplanted rodent prostate tumors Magn. Reson. Med. 51 487-94
11. Fietkau R 2004 Ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast. Increasing importance of radiotherapy as a part of the therapy approach Strahlenther. Onkol. 180 682-9
12. Furman-Haran E, Schechtman E, Kelcz F, Kirshenbaum K and Degani H 2005 Magnetic resonance imaging reveals functional diversity of the vasculature in benign and malignant breast lesions Cancer 104 708-18
13. Gaddis G M and Gaddis M L 1990 Introduction to biostatistics: part 5. Statistical inference techniques for hypothesis testing with nonparametric data Ann. Emerg. Med. 19 1054-9
14. Gilles R, Zafrani B, Guinebretiere J M, Meunier M, Lucidarme O, Tardivon A A, Rochard F, Vanel D, Neuenschwander S and Arriagada R 1995 Ductal carcinoma in situ: MRimaging-histopathologic correlation Radiology 196 415-9
15. Groves A M, Warren R M, Godward S and Rajan P S 2005 Characterization of pure high-grade DCIS on magnetic resonance imaging using the evolving breast MR lexicon terminology: can it be differentiated from pure invasive disease? Magn. Reson. Imaging 23 733-8
16. Guidi A J, Fischer L, Harris J R and Schnitt S J 1994 Microvessel density and distribution in ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast J. Natl Cancer Inst. 86 614-9
17. Heywang-Kobrunner S H et al 2001 International investigation of breast MRI: results of a multicentre study 11 sites) concerning diagnostic parameters for contrast-enhanced MRI based on 519 histopathologically correlated lesions Eur. Radiol. 11 531-46
18. Hulka C A, Edmister W B, Smith B L, Tan L, Sgroi D C, Campbell T, Kopans D B and Weisskoff R M 1997 Dynamic echo-planar imaging of the breast: experience in diagnosing breast carcinoma and correlation with tumor angiogenesis Radiology 205 837-42
19. Hulka C A, Smith B L, Sgroi D C, Tan L, Edmister W B, Semple J P, Campbell T, Kopans D B, Brady T J and Weisskoff R M 1995 Benign and malignant breast lesions: differentiation with echo-planar MR imaging Radiology 197 33-8
20. Jansen S A, Conzen S D, Fan X, Markiewicz E J, Newstead G M and Karczmar G S 2009a Magnetic resonance imaging of the natural history of in situ mammary neoplasia in transgenic mice: a pilot study Breast Cancer Res. 11 R65
21. Jansen S A, Fan X, Karczmar G S, Abe H, Schmidt R A, Giger M and Newstead G M 2008a DCEMRI of breast lesions: Is kinetic analysis equally effective for both mass and nonmass-like enhancement? Med. Phys. 35 3102-9
22. Jansen S A, Fan X, Karczmar G S, Abe H, Schmidt R A and Newstead G M 2008b Differentiation between benign and malignant breast lesions detected by bilateral dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI: a sensitivity and specificity study Magn. Reson. Med. 59 747-54
23. Jansen S A, Fan X, Yang C, Shimauchi A, Karczmar G and Newstead G M 2010 Relating dose of contrast media administered to uptake and washout of malignant lesions on DCEMRI of the breast Acad. Radiol. 17 24-30
24. Jansen S A, Newstead G M, Abe H, Shimauchi A, Schmidt R A and Karczmar G S 2007 Pure ductal carcinoma in situ: kinetic and morphologic MR characteristics compared with mammographic appearance and nuclear grade Radiology 245 684-91
25. Jansen S A, Paunesku T, Fan X, Woloschak G E, Vogt S, Conzen S D, Krausz T, Newstead G M and Karczmar G S 2009b Ductal carcinoma in situ: x-ray fluorescence microscopy and dynamic contrast-enhanced MR imaging reveals gadolinium uptake within neoplastic mammary ducts in a murine model Radiology 253 399-406
26. Kuhl C K, Schrading S, Bieling H B, Wardelmann E, Leutner C C, Koenig R, Kuhn W and Schild H H 2007 MRI for diagnosis of pure ductal carcinoma in situ: a prospective observational study Lancet 370 485-92
27. Leach M O 2009 Breast cancer screening in women at high risk using MRI NMR Biomed. 22 17-27
28. Lehman C D, DeMartini W, Anderson B O and Edge S B 2009 Indications for breast MRI in the patient with newly diagnosed breast cancer J. Natl Compr. Cancer Netw. 7 193-201
29. Medved M, Karczmar G, Yang C, Dignam J, Gajewski T F, Kindler H, Vokes E, MacEneany P, Mitchell M T and Stadler W M 2004 Semiquantitative analysis of dynamic contrast enhanced MRI in cancer patients: variability and changes in tumor tissue over time J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 20 122-8
30. Menell J H, Morris E A, Dershaw D D, Abramson A F, Brogi E and Liberman L 2005 Determination of the presence and extent of pure ductal carcinoma in situ by mammography and magnetic resonance imaging Breast J. 11 382-90
31. Mokbel K and Cutuli B 2006 Heterogeneity of ductal carcinoma in situ and its effects on management Lancet Oncol. 7 756-65
32. Moon M, Cornfeld D and Weinreb J 2009 Dynamic contrast-enhanced breast MR imaging Magn. Reson. Imaging Clin. N. Am. 17 351-62
33. Neubauer H, Li M, Kuehne-Heid R, Schneider A and Kaiser W A 2003 High grade and non-high grade ductal carcinoma in situ on dynamic MR mammography: characteristic findings for signal increase and morphological pattern of enhancement Br. J. Radiol. 76 3-12
34. Orel S G, Mendonca M H, Reynolds C, Schnall M D, Solin L J and Sullivan D C 1997 MR imaging of ductal carcinoma in situ Radiology 202 413-20
35. Orel S G and Schnall M D 2001 MR imaging of the breast for the detection, diagnosis, and staging of breast cancer Radiology 220 13-30
36. Oshida K, Nagashima T, Ueda T, Yagata H, Tanabe N, Nakano S, Nikaidou T, Funatsu H, Hashimoto H and Miyazaki M 2005 Pharmacokinetic analysis of ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast using dynamic MR mammography Eur. Radiol. 15 1353-60
37. Oto A, Fan X, Mustafi D, Jansen S A, Karczmar G S, Rubin D T and Kayhan A 2009 Quantitative analysis of dynamic contrast enhanced MRI for assessment of bowel inflammation in Crohn's disease pilot study Acad. Radiol. 16 1223-30
38. Sardanelli F, Rescinito G, Giordano G D, Calabrese M and Parodi R C 2000 MR dynamic enhancement of breast lesions: high temporal resolution during the first-minute versus eight-minute study J. Comput. Assist. Tomogr. 24 724-31
39. Schnall M D et al 2006 Diagnostic architectural and dynamic features at breast MR imaging: multicenter study Radiology 238 42-53
40. Tofts P S, Berkowitz B and Schnall M D 1995 Quantitative analysis of dynamic Gd-DTPA enhancement in breast tumors using a permeability model Magn. Reson. Med. 33 564-8
41. To f ts P S et al 1999 Estimating kinetic parameters from dynamic contrast-enhanced T1)-weighted MRI of a diffusable tracer: standardized quantities and symbols J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 10 223-32
42. Tsikitis V L and Chung M A 2006 Biology of ductal carcinoma in situ classification based on biologic potential Am. J. Clin. Oncol. 29 305-10
43. Van Goethem M, Schelfout K, Kersschot E, Colpaert C, Weyler J, Verslegers I, Biltjes I, De Schepper A and Parizel P M 2005 Comparison of MRI features of different grades of DCIS and invasive carcinoma of the breast JBR-BTR 88 225-32
44. Veltman J, Stoutjesdijk M, Mann R, Huisman H J, Barentsz J O, Blickman J G and Boetes C 2008 Contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging of the breast: the value of pharmacokinetic parameters derived from fast dynamic imaging during initial enhancement in classifying lesions Eur. Radiol. 18 1123-33
45. Viehweg P, Lampe D, Buchmann J and Heywang-Kobrunner S H 2000 In situ and minimally invasive breast cancer: morphologic and kinetic features on contrast-enhanced MR imaging Magma 11 129-37