Modeling and optimization of membrane fabrication using artificial neural network and genetic algorithm

Separation and Purification Technology

Volumn 76, Issue 1, 2010, Pages 33-43

  Madaeni, S S ^a   Hasankiadeh, N Tavajohi ^a   Kurdian, A R ^a   Rahimpour, A ^b  

^a RAZI UNIVERSITY   (Iran)

^b BABOL NOSHIRVANI UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Iran)

Author keywords

Artificial neural network; Genetic algorithm; Membrane; Modeling; Optimization

Indexed keywords

2-PROPANOL; ADDITIVE CONCENTRATIONS; ARTIFICIAL NEURAL NETWORK; EXPERIMENTAL DATA; EXPERIMENTAL SECTION; MAXIMUM FLUX; MEMBRANE FABRICATION; MEMBRANE PERFORMANCE; MEMBRANE PREPARATION; MODELING; MODELING AND OPTIMIZATION; N ,N-DIMETHYLACETAMIDE; NON-SOLVENTS; OPTIMUM CONCENTRATION; POLYETHERSULFONES; POLYVINYL PYRROLIDONE; QUATERNARY SYSTEMS; RELATIVE ERRORS; SEM MICROGRAPHS; THERMAL PROPERTIES;

ADDITIVES; GENETIC ALGORITHMS; MECHANICAL PROPERTIES; MEMBRANES; OPTIMIZATION; POLYMERS; SOLVENTS; THERMODYNAMIC PROPERTIES;

NEURAL NETWORKS;

EID: 78149280764     PISSN: 13835866     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.seppur.2010.09.017     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. J. Barzin, C. Feng, K.C. Khulbe, T. Matsuura, S.S. Madaeni, and H. Mirzadeh Characterization of polyethersulfone hemodialysis membrane by ultrafiltration and atomic force microscopy J. Membr. Sci. 237 2004 77 85
2. A. Rahimpour, S.S. Madaeni, and S. Mehdipour-Ataei Synthesis of a novel poly (amide-imide) (PAI) and preparation and characterization of PAI blended polyethersulfone (PES) membranes J. Membr. Sci. 311 2008 349 359
3. A. Rahimpour, S.S. Madaeni, and Y. Mansourpanah The effect of anionic, non-ionic and cationic surfactants on morphology and performance of polyethersulfone ultrafiltration membranes for milk concentration J. Membr. Sci. 296 2007 110 121
4. M. Al-Abri, and N. Hilal Artificial neural network simulation of combined humic substance coagulation and membrane filtration Chem. Eng. J. 141 2008 27 34
5. M.A. Razavia, A. Mortazavia, and M. Mousavi Application of neural networks for cross flow milk ultrafiltration simulation Int. Dairy J. 14 2004 69 80
6. H. Al-Zoubia, N. Hilala, N.A. Darwishb, and A.W. Mohammad Rejection and modeling of sulphate and potassium salts by nanofiltration membranes: neural network and Spiegler-Kedem model Desalination 206 2007 42 60
7. S. Curcio, G. Scilingo, V. Calabr'o, and G. Iorio Ultrafiltration of BSA in pulsating conditions: an artificial neural networks approach J. Membr. Sci. 246 2005 235 247
8. W.R. Bowen, M.G. Jones, and H.N.S. Yousef Dynamic ultrafiltration of proteins - a neural network approach J. Membr. Sci. 146 1998 225 235
9. W.R. Bowen, M.G. Jones, and H.N.S. Yousef Prediction of the rate of cross flow membrane ultrafiltration of colloids: a neural network approach Chem. Eng. Sci. 53 22 1998 3793 3802
10. M. Dornier, M. Decloux, G. Trystram, and A. Lebert Dynamic modeling of cross flow microfiltration using neural networks J. Membr. Sci. 98 1995 263 273
11. H. Niemi, A. Bulsari, and S. Palosaari Simulation of membrane separation by neural networks J. Membr. Sci. 102 1995 185 191
12. N. Delgrange, C. Cabassuda, M. Cabassudb, L. Durand-Bourlierc, and J.M. Laine Neural networks for prediction of ultrafiltration transmembrane pressure - application to drinking water production J. Membr. Sci. 150 1998 111 123
13. W.R. Bowen, M.G. Jones, J.S. Webfoot, and H.N.S. Yousef Predicting salt rejection at nanofiltration membranes using artificial neural networks Desalination 129 2000 147 162
14. C. Teodosiu, O. Pastravanu, and M. Macoveanu Neural network models for ultrafiltration and backwashing Water Res. 34 18 2000 4371 4380
15. M.A. Razavi, A. Mortazavi, and M. Mousavi Dynamic modelling of milk ultrafiltration by artificial neural network J. Membr. Sci. 220 2003 47 58
16. S. Curcio, V. Calabr'o, and G. Iorio Reduction and control of flux decline in cross-flow membrane processes modeled by artificial neural networks J. Membr. Sci. 286 2006 125 132
17. H. Chen, and A.S. Kim Prediction of permeate flux decline in cross flow membrane filtration of colloidal suspension: a radial basis function neural network approach Desalination 192 2006 415 428
18. G.B. Sahoo, and C. Ray Predicting flux decline in cross flow membranes using artificial neural networks and genetic algorithms J. Membr. Sci. 283 2006 147 157
19. Y. Zhao, J.S. Taylor, and S. Chellam Predicting RO/NF water quality by modified solution diffusion model and artificial neural networks J. Membr. Sci. 263 2005 38 46
20. P. Rai, G.C. Majumdar, S. DasGupta, and S. De Modeling the performance of batch ultrafiltration of synthetic fruit juice and mosambi juice using artificial neural network J. Food Eng. 71 3 2005 273 281
21. 2 using a synthesized PDMS membrane: experimental and neural network modeling J. Membr. Sci. 346 2010 59 70
22. M.T. Hagan, and H.B. Demuth Neural Network Design 1996 PWS Publishing Company, a Division of Thomas Learning United States of America
23. S. Rajasekaran, and G.A.V. Pai Neural Networks, Fuzzy Logic, and Genetic Algorithms 2007 Prentice-Hall India
24. X. Chen, and N. Wang A DNA based genetic algorithm for parameter estimation in the hydrogenation reaction Chem. Eng. J. 150 2009 527 535
25. J.L.C. Santos, A.M. Hidalgo, R. Oliveira, S. Velizarov, and J.G. Crespo Analysis of solvent flux through nanofiltration membranes by mechanistic, chemometric and hybrid modeling J. Membr. Sci. 300 2007 191 204
26. N.A. Ochoa, P. Prandanos, L. Palacio, C. Pagliero, J. Marches, and A. Hernandez Pore size distributions based on AFM imaging and retention of multidisperse polymer solutes: characterization of polyethersulfone UF membrane with dope containing different PVP J. Membr. Sci. 187 2001 227 237
27. J.M. Margolis Engineering Plastics Handbook 2006 McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc.
28. M. Ian, and Smallwood Handbook of Organic Solvent Properties 1996 Co published by Halsted Press and John Wiley & Sons Inc. United States of America
29. J.E. Mark Polymer Data Handbook 1998 Oxford University Press, Inc.