Audience response systems as a data collection method in organizational research

Journal of Management and Organization

Volumn 15, Issue 1, 2009, Pages 122-131

  McCarter, Matthew W ^a   Caza, Arran ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT URBANA CHAMPAIGN   (United States)

Author keywords

Audience response system; Audience response technology; Data collection techniques; Data collection technology; Organizational research methods; Personal response system

Indexed keywords

EID: 78149254019     PISSN: 18333672     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.5172/jmo.837.15.1.122     Document Type: Article

References (49)

1. Armstrong JS and Sperry T (1994) Business school prestige: Research versus teaching, Interfaces 24: 13-43.
2. Barber M and Njus D (2007) Clicker evolution: Seeking intelligent design, CBE-Life Science Education 6: 1-20.
3. Boyer EL (1990) Scholarship reconsidered: Priorities of the professoriate. Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching, Princeton NJ.
4. Bryman A (2000) Research methods and organization studies. Routledge, London UK.
5. Bunz U (2005) Using scantron versus an audience response system for survey research: Does methodology matter when measuring computer-mediated communication competence? Computers & Human Behaviour 21: 343-359.
6. Byrd GG, Coleman S and Werneth C (2004) Exploring the universe together: Cooperative Quizzes with and without a Classroom Performance System in Astronomy 101, Astronomy Education Review 3: Retrieved 10 October 2007, from http://aer.noao.edu/cgibin/article.pl?id=91%3E%3Cimg%20src=.
7. Caldwell J (2006) Clickers in the large classroom: Current research and best-practice tips, CBE-Life Science Education 6: 9-20.
8. Cohen J (1988) Statistical power analysis for the behavioural sciences. Erlbaum, Hillsdale NJ.
9. Czaja S, Sharit J, Nair S and Rubert M (1998) Understanding sources of user variability in computer-based data entry performance, Behaviour & Information Technology 17: 282-293.
10. D'Arcy CJ, Eastburn DM and Mullally K (2007) Effective use of a personal response system in a general education plant pathology class, Planet Earth Instructor. Retrieved 10 October 2007, from http://www.apsnet.org/education/InstructorCommunication/TeachingArticles/PRSPathology/default.htm.
11. Diekmann A (1985) Volunteer's dilemma, Journal of Conflict Resolution 29: 605-610.
12. Dillmam A (2007) Mail and internet surveys: The tailored design method. Wiley, Hoboken NJ.
13. Draper S, Cargill J and Cutts Q (2002) Electronic enhanced classroom interaction, Australian Journal of Education Technology 18: 13-23.
14. Duncan D (2006) Clickers: A new teaching aid with exceptional promise, Astronomy Education Review 5: 70-88.
15. Eden D (2003) Critical management studies and the academy of management journal: Challenge and counterchallenge, Academy of Management Journal 46: 390-394.
16. Eid M and Diener E (2005) Handbook of multi-method measurement in psychology. American Psychological Association, Washington DC.
17. Feng S (2004) Detecting errors in the current population survey: a matching approach, Economics Letters 82: 189-194.
18. Fies C and Marshall J (2006) Classroom response systems: A review of the literature, Journal of Science Education & Technology 15: 101-109.
19. Fox KJ and Milbourne R (1999) What determines research output of academic economists? Economic Record 75: 256-267.
20. Franzen A (1995) Group size and one-shot collective action, Rationality & Society 7: 183-200.
21. Gamito E, Burhansstipanov L, Krebs L, Bemis L and Bradley A (2005) The use of an electronic audience response system for data collection, Journal of Cancer Education 20: 80-86.
22. Hansen J and Hill N (1998) Control and audit of electronic data interchange, MIS Quarterly 13: 402-413.
23. Hatch S (2003) ARS systems: creativity and planning required, Corporate Meetings & Incentives 22: 35-36.
24. Hattie J and Marsh HW (1996) The relationship between research and teaching: A meta-analysis, Review of Educational Research 66: 507-542.
25. Heckathorn D (1996) The dynamics and dilemmas of collective action, American Sociological Review 61: 250-277.
26. Homme J, Asay G and Morgenstern B (2004) Utilisation of an audience response system, Medical Education 38: 575.
27. James C (1990) Evaluating the cost effectiveness of hand-held computer technology, Public Productivity & Management Review 13: 201-213.
28. Kerr S (1975) On the folly of rewarding A, while hoping for B, Academy of Management Journal 18: 769-783.
29. Krantz M (2004) Audience response system = marketing tool, Meeting News 28: 5.
30. Liebrand W (1983) A classification of social dilemma games, Simulation & Games 14: 123-138.
31. Magolda MB (1999) Creating contexts for learning and self-authorship. Vanderbilt University Press, Nashville TN.
32. Miller R, Ashar B and Getz K (2003) Evaluation of an audience response system for continuing education of health professionals, Journal of Continuing Education in the Health Professions 23: 109-116.
33. Murnighan JK, Kim JW and Metzger AR (1993) The volunteer dilemma, Administrative Science Quarterly 38: 515-538.
34. Murphy FH (1994) Don't let shallow reporters set the agenda: A comment on Armstrong & Sperry (1994) Interfaces 24: 25-26.
35. Olson M (1965) The logic of collective action: Public goods and the theory of groups. Harvard University Press, Cambridge MA.
36. Pedhazur E and Schmelkin L (1991) Measurement, design, and analysis: An integrated approach. Erlbaum, Hillsdale NJ.
37. Rogelberg S, Church A, Waclawski J and Stanton J (2002) Organizational survey research. In Rogelberg S (ed) Handbook of Research Methods in Industrial and Organizational Psychology, pp.141-161, Blackwell Publishing, Boston MA.
38. Rosenthal R (1994) Science and ethics in conducting, analyzing, and reporting psychological research, Psychological Science 5: 127-134.
39. Scandura T and Williams E (2000) Research methodology in management: Current practices, trends, and implications for future research, Academy of Management Journal 43: 1248-1264.
40. Sen A (1985) Goals, commitment, and identity, Journal of Law Economics & Organizations 1: 341-355.
41. Siegel S (1956) Nonparametric statistics for the behavioural sciences. McGraw-Hill, New York.
42. Shadish WR, Cook TD and Campbell DT (2002) Experimental and quasi-experimental designs for generalized causal inference. Houghton Mifflin, Boston MA.
43. Smith W (1967) Accuracy of manual entries in data collection devices, Journal of Applied Psychology 51: 362-368.
44. Sproull LS (1986) Using electronic mail for data collection in organizational research, Academy of Management Journal 29: 159-169.
45. Starbuck WH (2004) Why I stopped trying to understand the real world, Organization Studies 27: 1233-1254.
46. Stone-Romero E (2002). The relative validity and usefulness of various empirical research designs, in Rogelberg S (ed) Handbook of Research Methods in Industrial and Organizational Psychology, pp.77-98, Blackwell Publishing, Boston MA.
47. Task Force on Teaching and Career Development (2007) A compact to enhance teaching and learning at Harvard. Harvard University Press, Cambridge MA.
48. Training and Development (2006) Improving business decisions and strategic planning, 60: 63-65.
49. Webb E, Campbell D, Schwartz R and Sechrest L (2000) Unobtrusive measures: Revised edition. Sage, London.