The internationalisation of public sector research through international joint laboratories

Science and Public Policy

Volumn 37, Issue 8, 2010, Pages 559-570

  Jonkers, Koen ^a   Cruz Castro, Laura ^a  

^a The Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas   (Spain)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

GLOBALIZATION; INSTITUTIONAL FRAMEWORK; LABORATORY METHOD; PUBLIC SECTOR; QUALITATIVE ANALYSIS; RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT;

EID: 78049519065     PISSN: 03023427     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3152/030234210X12767691861056     Document Type: Article

References (31)

1. Aksnes, D W, N Frølich and S Slipersæter 2008, Science policy and the driving forces behind the internationalisation of science: the case of Norway. Science and Public Policy, 35(6), 445-457.
2. Amanatidou, E 2002. Foreign policy and international R&D collaboration policy in Greece. Science and Public Policy, 29(6), 439-450.
3. Beerkens, E and M Derwende 2007. The paradox in international cooperation: institutionally embedded universities in a global environment. Higher Education, 53(1), 61-79.
4. Beaver D 2001. Reflections on scientific collaboration (and its study): past, present, and future. Scientometrics, 52(3), 365-377.
5. Bonnema, A B, Z Lin, L Qu, and E Jacobsen 2006. Developing institutional collaboration between Wageningen University and the Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences. NJAS - Wageningen Journal of Life Sciences, 53(3/4), 369-386.
6. Carayannis, E G and P Laget 2004. Transatlantic innovation infrastructure networks: public-private, EU-US R&D partnerships. R&D Management, 34(1), 17-31.
7. Chung, S C 2002. Catching up through international linkages: science, technology and the Korean experience. Science and Public Policy, 29(6), 431-437.
8. CNRS 2009a. Affaires Européennes et Relations Internationales - International Joint Units, UMI. Available at >https:// dri-dae.cnrs-dir.fr/spip.php?article1142<, last accessed January 2009.
9. CNRS 2009b. Affaires Européennes et Relations Internationales - LEA/LIA. Available at >https://dri-dae.cnrs-dir.fr/spip.php? article1142<, last accessed January 2009.
10. European Commission 2008. A strategic European framework for international science and technology cooperation. Communication from the Commission to the Council and the European Parliament, European Commission Director General for Research, Brussels. Available at >http://ec.europa.eu/research/ iscp/pdf/com_2008_588_en.pdf<, last accessed June 2009.
11. Finholt, T A 2003. Collaboratories as a new form of scientific organization. Economics of Innovation and New Technology, 12(1), 5-25.
12. Georghiou, L 1998. Global cooperation in research. Research Policy, 27(6), 611-626.
13. Geuna, A 1998 The internationalisation of European universities. A return to medieval roots. Minerva, 36(3), 253-270.
14. Glänzel, W and A Schubert 2004. Analysing scientific networks through co-authorship. In Handbook of Quantitative Science and Technology Research; the Use of Publication and Patent Statistics in Studies of S&T Systems, H F Moed, W Glänzel and U Schmoch, eds., pp 257-276. Dordrecht, the Netherlands: Kluwer.
15. Greenaway, F 1996. Science International. A History of ICSU. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
16. Grumbach, S 2007. EU-China mobility, the contribution of a joint laboratory in IT. Conference for the 10th anniversary of LIAMA, Beijing. Available at >http://ec.europa.eu/research/ iscp/eu-china/pdf/grumbach_en.pdf< last accessed January 2009.
17. Gulati, R and M Gargiulo 1999. Where do interorganizational networks come from? American Journal of Sociology, 104(5), 1439-1493.
18. Jappe, A 2007. Explaining international collaboration in global environmental change research. Scientometrics, 71(3), 367-390.
19. Jonkers, K 2009. Emerging ties: factors underlying China's copublication patterns with Western European and North American research systems in three molecular life science subfields. Scientometrics, 80(3), 775-795.
20. Jonkers, K 2010. Mobility, Migration and the Chinese Scientific Research System. Abingdon, UK: Routledge.
21. Katz, J S and B Martin 1997. What is research collaboration? Research Policy, 26(1), 1-18.
22. Leydesdorff, L and C S Wagner 2005. Network structure, self-organization, and the growth of international collaboration in science. Research Policy, 34(10), 1608-1618.
23. Max-Planck-Gesellschaft 2007. Kooperation mit China. Available at >http://www.mpg.de/ueberDieGesellschaft/wissenschaftlicheKooperationen/kooperationAusland/bilateraleKooperationen/china/index.html<, last accessed January 2009.
24. Max-Planck-Gesellschaft 2008. Die Kooperation der Max-Planck- Gesellschaft in Indien. Available at >http://www.mpg.de/ueber DieGesellschaft/wissenschaftlicheKooperationen/kooperationAusland/bilateraleKooperationen/indien/index.html<, last accessed January 2009.
25. Max-Planck-Gesellschaft 2009. Partner groups: mission and profile. Available at >http://www.mpg.de/english/institutes ProjectsFacilities/partner-groups/aboutPgrp/index.html<, last accessed January 2009.
26. Sakakibara, M 1997. Evaluating government-sponsored R&D consortia in Japan: who benefits and how? Research Policy, 26(4/5), 447-473.
27. Smith, D and J S Katz 2000. Collaborative approaches to research, HEFCE Fundamental Review of Research Policy and Funding, Final Report, University of Sussex, Brighton, UK. Available at >http://www.sussex.ac.uk/Users/sylvank/pubs/collc.pdf<, last accessed January 2009.
28. Stein, J A 2002. Science, technology and European foreign policy: European integration, global interaction. Science and Public Policy, 29(6), 463-477.
29. Wagner, C S 2002. The elusive partnership: science and foreign policy. Science and Public Policy, 29(6), 409-417.
30. Wagner, C S 2005. Six case studies of international collaboration in science. Scientometrics, 62(1), 3-26.
31. Zedtwitz von, M and O Gassmann 2002. Market versus technology drive in R&D internationalization: four different patterns of managing research and development. Research Policy, 31(4), 569-588.