To name or not to name? An overview of the social and ethical issues raised by removing anonymity from sperm donors

Asian Journal of Andrology

Volumn 12, Issue 6, 2010, Pages 801-806

  Burr, Jennifer A ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SHEFFIELD   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

anonymity; disclosure; ethics; genetic origins; secrecy; sperm donation

Indexed keywords

ARTIFICIAL INSEMINATION; BIOETHICS; FAMILY DECISION MAKING; FERTILIZATION IN VITRO; HUMAN RELATION; HUMAN RIGHTS; KNOWLEDGE; PARENT; SHORT SURVEY; SOCIAL ASPECT; SOCIAL ATTITUDE; SOCIAL SECURITY; SPERM DONOR;

ASIA; ATTITUDE; CHILD; CONFIDENTIALITY; EUROPE; FEMALE; HOMOSEXUALITY, FEMALE; HUMANS; INSEMINATION, ARTIFICIAL, HETEROLOGOUS; MALE; PRIVACY; SELF DISCLOSURE; SPERMATOZOA; TISSUE AND ORGAN PROCUREMENT; TISSUE DONORS; TRUTH DISCLOSURE;

EID: 78049514672     PISSN: 1008682X     EISSN: 17457262     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1038/aja.2010.60     Document Type: Short Survey

References (52)

1. Gong D, Liu YL, Zheng Z, Tian YF, Li Z. An overview on ethical issues about sperm donation. Asian J Androl 2009;11:645-52.
2. Haimes E, Daniels K. International social science perspectives on donor insemination: an introduction. In: Daniels K, Haimes E, editors. Donor Insemination International Social Science Perspectives. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 1998.
3. Daniels KR, Lewis GM. Donor insemination: the gifting and selling of semen. Soc Sci Med 1996;42:1521-36.
4. Becker G. The Elusive Embryo: How Women And Men Approach New Reproductive Technology. Berkeley: University of California Press; 2000.
5. Hargreaves K. Constructing families and kinship through donor insemination. Sociol Health Illn 2006;28:261-83.
6. Grace V, Daniels K. The (ir) relevance of genetics: engendering parallel worlds of procreation and reproduction. Sociol Health Illn 2007;29:692-710.
7. Burr J. Fear, fascination and the sperm donor as 'abjection' in interviews with heterosexual recipients of donor insemina tion. Sociol Health Illn 2009;31:705-18.
8. Donovan C. It's not really seen as an issue, you know, lesbian infertility its kind of 'what's that?': lesbians' unsuccessful experiences of medicalised donor insemination. Med Sociol Online 2008;3:15-24.
9. Schenker JG, Shushan A. Ethical and legal aspects of assisted reproduction practice in Asia. Hum Reprod 1996;4:908-11.
10. McWhinnie A. Gamete donation and anonymity. Hum Reprod 2001;16:807-17.
11. Warnock Report. The Report of the Committee of Inquiry into Human Fertilisation and Embryology. London: HMSO; 1984.
12. Haimes E. Recreating the family? Policy considerations relating to the 'new' reproductive technologies. In: McNeil M, Varcoe I, Yearly S, editors. The New Reporductive Technologies. Basingstoke: Macmillan; 1990.
13. Available from: http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/science/ article4215440.ece. June 26, 2008 [cited 29 March 2010].
14. Sheldon S. Fragmenting fatherhood: the regulation of reproductive technologies. Mod Law Rev 2005;68:523-55.
15. Blyth E, Hunt J. Sharing genetic origins information in donor assisted conception: views from licensed centres on HREA donor information form 4. Hum Reprod 1998;13:3274-7.
16. Frith L. Gamete donation and anonymity: the ethical and legal debate. Hum Reprod 2001;16:818-24.
17. Snowden R, Mitchell GD, Snowden EM. Artificial Reproduction: A Social Investigation. London: George Allen and Unwin, 1983.
18. Bellis M, Hughes K, Hughes S, Ashton J. Measuring paternal discrepancy and its public health consequences. J Epidemiol Community Health 2005;59:749-54.
19. Shenfeld F, Steele DJ. What are the effects of anonymity and secrecy on the welfare of the child in gamete donation? Hum Reprod 1997;12:392-5.
20. Blyth E, Frith L. The UK's gamete donor 'crisis' - a critical analysis. Crit Soc Policy 2008;28:74-95.
21. Adams J, Pease E, Lieberman B. Donor recruitment: change attitudes not the law. Bionews, 16 October 2006. [cited 12 June 2010]. Available from: http://www.bionews.org.uk/page-37904.asp).
22. Brewaeys A, Golombok S, Naaktgeboren N, de Bruyn J, van Hall E. Donor insemination: Dutch parents' opinions about confidentiality and donor anonymity and the emotional adjustment of their children. Hum Reprod 1997;12:1591-7.
23. Brewaeys A. Donor insemination, the impact on family and child development. J Psychosom Obstet Gynaecol 1996;17:1-13.
24. Leiblum SR, Aviv AL. Disclosure issues and decisions of couples who conceived via donor insemination. J Psychosom Obstet Gynaecol 1997;18:292-300.
25. Golombok S, Breaeys A, Giavazzi MT, Guerra D, MacCallum F, Rust J. The European study of assisted reproduction families: The transition to adolescence. Hum Reprod 2002;17:830-40.
26. Söderström-Anttila V, Foudila T, Ripatti UR, Siegberg R. Embryo donation: outcome and attitudes among embryo donors and recipients. Hum Reprod 2001;16:1120-8.
27. Cook R, Golombok S, Bish A, Murray C. Disclosure of donor insemination: parental attitudes. Am J Orthopsychiatry 1995;65:549-59.
28. Gottlieb C, Lalos O, Lindblad F. Disclosure of donor insemination to the child: the impact of Swedish legislation on couples' attitudes. Hum Reprod 2000;15:2052-6.
29. Walker A, Gregson S, McLaughlin E. Attitudes towards donor insemination-a post Warnock survey. Hum Reprod 1987;2:745-50.
30. Daniels KR, Taylor K. Secrecy and openness in donor insemination. Politics Life Sci 1993;12:155-70.
31. Klock SC, Jacob NC, Maier DA. A prospective study of donor insemination recipients: secrecy, privacy, and disclosure. Fertil Steril 1994;62:477-84.
32. Purdie A, Peek JC, Irwin R, Ellis J, Graham FM, Fisher PR. Identifable semen donors-attitudes of donors and recipient couples. NZ Med J 1992;105:27-8.
33. Brewaeys A, Ponjaert-Kristoffersen I, Van Steirteghem A, Devroey P. Children from anonymous donors: an inquiry into homosexual and heterosexual parents' attitudes. J Psychosom Obstet Gynaecol 1993;14:23-35.
34. Snowden R, Mitchell G. The artifcial family: a consideration of artificial insemination by donor. London: George Allen and Unwin; 1981.
35. Snowden R, Snowden E. The Gift of a Child. Exeter: University of Exeter Press; 1993.
36. Baran A, Pannor R. Lethal Secrets. New York: Warner Books; 1989.
37. McWhinnie A. Creating children: the medical and social dilemmas of assisted reproduction. Early Child Dev Care 1992;81:39-54.
38. McWhinnie A. Families from assisted conception: ethical and psychological issues. Hum Fertil 2000;13:13-9.
39. Burr J, Reynolds P. Thinking the right to genetic inheritance: liberal rights, communitarianism and the right to privacy for parents of DI children. J Med Ethics 2008;34:281-4.
40. Daniels KR, Lewis GM, Gillet W. Telling donor insemination offspring about their conception: the nature of couples' decision-making. Soc Sci Med 1995;40:1213-20.
41. Looi K. Donor Insemination: Which Families Tell? In: Jansen R, Mortimer D, editors. Towards Reproductive Certainty: Fertility and Genetics Beyond 1999. Lancashire: Parthenon; 1999. pp145-56.
42. Miall C. The stigma of involuntary childlessness. Soc Probl 1986;33:268.
43. Kirkman M. Parents' contributions to the narrative identity of offspring of donor-assisted conception. Soc Sci Med 2003;57:2229-42.
44. Rowland R. The social and psychological consequences of secrecy in artifcial insemination by donor (AID) programmes. Soc Sci Med 1985;21:391-6.
45. Nachtigall RD, Tschann JM, Quiroga SS, Pitcher L, Becker G. Stigma, disclosure, and family functioning among parents of children conceived through donor insemination. Fertil Steril, 1997;68:83-9.
46. Pennings G. The 'double track' policy for donor anonymity. Hum Reprod 1997;12:2839-44.
47. Kovacs G. The Use of Donor Insemination. The Subfertility Handbook: A Clinicians' Guide. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 1997. pp139-50.
48. Golombok S, Cook R, Bish A, Murray C. Families created by the new reproductive technologies: quality of parenting and social and emotional development of the children. Child Dev 1995;64:285-8.
49. Golombok S, Brewaeys A, Cook R, Giavazzi MT, Guerra D, et al. The European study of assisted reproduction families: family functioning and child development. Hum Reprod 1996;11:101-8.
50. Snowden R. Snowden E. Families created through donor insemination. In: Daniels K, Haimes E, editors. Donor Insemination: International Social Science Perspectives. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 1998.
51. Haimes E. Issues of gender in gamete donation. Soc Sci Med 1993;36:85-93.
52. Jadva V, Freeman T, Kramer W, Golombok S. The experiences of adolescents and adults conceived by sperm donation: comparisons by age of disclosure and family type. Hum Rprod 2009;24:1909-19.