Modification of the convexity prior but not the light-from-above prior in visual search with shaded objects

Journal of Vision

Volumn 7, Issue 13, 2007, Pages

  Champion, Rebecca A ^a,b   Adams, Wendy J ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHAMPTON   (United Kingdom)

^b CARDIFF UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

3D shape; Adaptation; Convexity prior; Haptics; Learning; Light from above prior; Re calibration; Shading; Visual search

Indexed keywords

ADAPTATION; ADULT; ARTICLE; CALIBRATION; DECISION MAKING; DEPTH PERCEPTION; HUMAN; LIGHT; METHODOLOGY; PATTERN RECOGNITION; PERCEPTION; PHOTOSTIMULATION; PHYSIOLOGY; VISION;

ADAPTATION, PHYSIOLOGICAL; ADULT; CALIBRATION; DEPTH PERCEPTION; FORM PERCEPTION; HUMANS; JUDGMENT; LIGHT; PERCEPTUAL MASKING; PHOTIC STIMULATION; VISUAL PERCEPTION;

EID: 35648937959     PISSN: None     EISSN: 15347362     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1167/7.13.10     Document Type: Article

References (19)

1. Adams, W. J. (in press). Frames or reterence for the light-from-above prior in visual search and shape judgements. Cognition.
2. Adams, W. J. (2007). A common light-prior for visual search, shape and reflectance judgements. Journal of Vision, 7(11):11, 1-7, http://journalofvision.org(7/11/11/, doi: 10. 116717.11.11.
3. Adams, W. J., Graf, E. W., & Ernst, M. O. (2004). Experience can change the "light-from-above" prior. Nature Neuroscience, 7, 1057-1058.
4. Aks, D. J., & Enns, J. T. (1992). Visual search for direction of shading is influenced by apparent depth. Perception & Psychophysics, 52, 63-74.
5. Aks, D. J., & Enns, J. T. (1996). Visual search for size is influenced by a background texture gradient. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 22, 1467-1481.
6. Brewster, D. (1826). On the optical illusion of the conversion of cameos into intaglios, and of intaglios into cameos, with an account of other analogous phenomena. Edinburgh Journal of Science, 4, 99-108.
7. Chacón, J. (2004). Perceived contrast explains asymmetries in visual-search tasks with- shaded stimuli. Perception, 33, 1499-1509.
8. Enns, J. T., & Rensink, R. A. (1990). Influence of scene-based properties on visual search. Science, 247, 721-723.
9. He, Z. J., & Nakayama, K. (1992). Surfaces versus features in visual search. Nature, 359, 231-233.
10. Kleffner, D. A., & Ramachandran, V. S. (1992). On the perception of shape from shading. Perception & Psychophysics, 52, 18-36.
11. Langer, M. S., & Bülthoff, H. H. (2001), A prior for global convexity in local shape-from-shading. Perception, 30, 403-410.
12. Mamassian, P., & Goutcher, R. (2001). Prior knowledge on the illumination position. Cognition, 81, B1-B9.
13. Ramachandran, V. S. (1988) Perception of shape from shading. Nature, 331, 163-166.
14. Rauschenberger, R., & Yantis, S. (2001). Masking unveils pre-amodal completion representation in visual search. Nature, 410, 369-372.
15. Rushton, S. K., Bradshaw, M. F., & Warren, P. A. (2007). The pop-out of scene-relative object movement against retinal motion due to self-movement. Cognition, 105, 237-245.
16. Santhi, N., & Reeves, A. (2004). The roles of distractor noise and target certainty in search: A signal detection model. Vision Research, 44, 1235-1256.
17. Sun, J., & Perona, P. (1996). Early computation of shape and reflectance in the visual system, Nature, 379, 165-168.
18. Sun, J., & Perona, P. (1997). Shading and stereo in early perception of shape and reflectance. Perception, 26, 519-529.
19. Sun, J., & Perona, P. (1998). Where is the sun? Nature Neuroscience, 1, 183-184.