Only the Names Have Been Changed: Ability Grouping Revisited

Urban Review

Volumn 42, Issue 4, 2010, Pages 271-295

  Worthy, Jo ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT AUSTIN   (United States)

Author keywords

Ability grouping; Language arts; Middle school; Tracking

Indexed keywords

EID: 78049476209     PISSN: 00420972     EISSN: 15731960     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s11256-009-0134-1     Document Type: Article

References (77)

1. Allington, R. L. (1980). Poor readers don't get to read much in reading groups. Language Arts, 57, 872-876.
2. Allington, R. L. (1983). The reading instruction provided readers of differing reading abilities. The Elementary School Journal, 83, 548-559.
3. Alvarez, D., & Mehan, H. (2006). Whole-school detracking: A strategy for equity and excellence. Theory Into Practice, 45, 82-89.
4. Apple, M. (2001). Comparing neo-liberal projects and inequality in education. Comparative Education, 37, 409-423.
5. Ashton, P. T., & Webb, R. B. (1986). Making a difference: Teachers' sense of efficacy and student achievement. New York: Longman.
6. Auerbach, S. (2002). Why do they give the good classes to some and not to others?" Latino parent narratives of struggle in a college access program. Teachers College Record, 104, 1369-1392.
7. Bakhtin, M. M. (1981). The dialogic imagination: Four essays. Austin, TX: University of Texas Press.
8. Barker Lunn, J. C. (1970). Streaming in the primary school. London, England: National Foundation for Educational Research in England and Wales.
9. Barr, R. (1995). What research says about grouping in the past and present and what it suggests about the future. In M. Radencich & L. McKay (Eds.), Flexible grouping for literacy in the elementary grades (pp. 1-24). Needham Heights, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
10. Barr, R., & Dreeben, R. (1991). Grouping students for reading instruction. In R. Barr, M. L. Kamil, P. Mosenthal, & P. D. Pearson (Eds.), Handbook of reading research (Vol. II, pp. 885-910). New York: Longman.
11. Bartolomé, L. I. (2003). Beyond the methods fetish: Toward a humanizing pedagogy. In A. Darder, M. Baltodano, & R. D. Torres (Eds.), The critical pedagogy reader (pp. 408-429). New York: Routledge/Falmer.
12. Berghoff, B., & Egawa, K. (1991). No more "rocks": Grouping to give students control of their learning. Reading Teacher, 44, 536-541.
13. Blanchett, W. J. (2006). Disproportionate representation of African American students in special education: Acknowledging the role of white privilege and racism. Educational Researcher, 35, 24-28.
14. Brophy, J. E., & Good, T. L. (1970). Teachers' communication of differential expectations for children's classroom performance: Some behavioral data. Journal of Educational Psychology, 61, 365-374.
15. Carbonaro, W. J., & Gamoran, A. (2002). The production of achievement inequality in high school English. American Educational Research Journal, 29, 801-827.
16. Chorzempa, B. F., & Graham, S. (2006). Primary-grade teachers' use of within-class ability grouping in reading. Journal of Educational Psychology, 98, 529-541.
17. Cone, J. K. (2006). Detracked ninth-grade English: Apprenticeship for the work and world of high school and beyond. Theory Into Practice, 45, 55-63.
18. Crosby, M. S., & Owens, E. M. (1993). The disadvantages of tracking and ability grouping: A look at cooperative learning as an alternative. Solutions and Strategies, 5, 1-9.
19. Datnow, A., & Hirschberg, D. (1996). A case study of king middle school: The symbiosis of heterogeneous grouping and multicultural education. Journal of Education for Students Placed at Risk, 1, 115-134.
20. Donelan, R. W., Neal, G. A., & Jones, D. L. (1994). The promise of Brown and the reality of Academic Grouping: The tracks of my tears. The Journal of Negro Education, 63, 376-387.
21. Dreeben, R., & Barr, R. (1988). Classroom composition and the design of instruction. Sociology of Education, 61, 129-142.
22. Dreeben, R., & Gamoran, A. (1986). Race, instruction, and learning. American Sociological Review, 51, 660-669.
23. Dweck, C. S., & Leggett, E. L. (1988). A social-cognitive approach to motivation and personality. Psychological Review, 95, 256-273.
24. Eder, D. (1981). Ability grouping as self-fulfilling prophecy: A micro-analysis of teacher-students interaction. Sociology of Education, 54, 151-160.
25. Emerson, R., Fretz, R. I., & Shaw, L. L. (1995). Writing ethnographic fieldnotes. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
26. Erlandson, D. A., Harris, E. L., Skipper, B. L., & Allen, S. D. (1993). Doing naturalistic inquiry. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
27. Esposito, D. (1973). Homogeneous and heterogeneous ability grouping: Principal findings and implications for designing more effective educational environments. Review of Educational Research, 43, 163-179.
28. Faulkner, W. (1971). Requiem for a nun. New York: Vintage.
29. Fine, M., Bloom, J., Burns, A., Chajet, L., Guishard, M., Payne, Y., et al. (2005). Dear Zora: A letter to Zora Neale Hurston 50 years after Brown. Teachers College Record, 107, 496-528.
30. Gambrell, L., Wilson, R. M., & Walter, N. (1981). Classroom observations of task-attending behaviors of good and poor readers. Journal of Educational Research, 74, 400-404.
31. Gamoran, A. (1986). Instructional and institutional effects of ability grouping. Sociology of Education, 59, 185-199.
32. Gamoran, A. (1992). The variable effects of high school tracking. American Sociological Review, 57, 812-828.
33. Gamoran, A., Nystrand, M., Berends, M., & Lepore, P. C. (1995). An organizational analysis of the effects of ability grouping. American Educational Research Journal, 32, 687-715.
34. Gay, G. (2002). Preparing for culturally responsive teaching. Journal of Teacher Education, 53, 110-116.
35. Good, T. L., & Brophy, J. E. (1972). Behavioral expression of teacher attitudes. Journal of Educational Psychology, 63, 617-624.
36. Goodlad, J. (1984). A place called school: Prospects for the future. New York: McGraw-Hill.
37. Goodlad, J. (1985). Forward to keeping track: How schools structure inequality (Oakes J.).. New Haven, CT: Yale University.
38. Graue, M. E., & Walsh, D. J. (1998). Studying children in context: Theories methods and ethics. Thousand Oaks: Sage.
39. Gregory, R. P. (1984). Streaming, setting, and mixed ability grouping in primary and secondary schools: Some research findings. Educational Studies, 10, 209-226.
40. Gutiérrez, K. D., & Rogoff, B. (2003). Cultural ways of learning: Individual traits or repertoires of practice. Educational Researcher, 32, 19-25.
41. Haberman, M. (1991). The pedagogy of poverty versus good teaching. Phi Delta Kappan, 73, 290-294.
42. Ireson, J., & Hallam, S. (1999). Raising standards: Is ability grouping the answer? Oxford Review of Education, 25, 343-358.
43. Kulik, C. C., & Kulik, J. A. (1982). Research synthesis on ability grouping. Educational Leadership, 82, 619-622.
44. Labov, W. (1972). Language in the inner city: Studies in the Black English vernacular. Philadelphia, PA: University of Pennsylvania Press.
45. Ladson-Billings, G. (1995). But that's just good teaching! The case for culturally relevant pedagogy. Theory into Practice, 34, 159-165.
46. LeTendre, G. K., Hofer, B. K., & Shimizu, H. (2003). What is tracking? Cultural expectations in the United States, Germany, and Japan. American Educational Research Journal, 40, 43-89.
47. Lucas, S. R. (1999). Tracking inequality: Stratification and mobility in American high schools. New York: Teachers College Press.
48. Marsh, H. W. (1984). Relationships among dimensions of self-attribution, dimensions of self-concept, and academic achievements. Journal of Educational Psychology, 78, 190-200.
49. McCarthey, S. J. (2001). Identity construction in elementary readers and writers. Reading Research Quarterly, 36, 122-151.
50. Mehan, H. (1979). "What time is it, Denise?" Asking known information questions in classroom discourse. Theory Into Practice, 18, 285-294.
51. Mehan, H., Villanueva, L., Hubbard, L., & Lintz, A. (1996). Constructing school success: The consequences of untracking low-achieving students. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
52. Nieto, S. (1995). Affirming diversity: The sociopolitical context of multicultural education. White Plains, NY: Longman.
53. Nieto, S. (2000). Puerto Rican students in U S. schools.. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
54. Nystrand, M., & Gamoran, A. (1991). Instructional discourse, student engagement, and literature achievement. Research in the Teaching of English, 25, 261-290.
55. Oakes, J. (1985). Keeping track: How school systems structure inequality. New Haven, CN: Yale University Press.
56. Oakes, J. (2005). Keeping track: How school systems structure inequality (2nd ed.). New Haven, CN: Yale University Press.
57. Oakes, J., Wells, A., Jones, M., & Datnow, A. (1997). Detracking: The social construction of ability, cultural politics, and resistance to reform. Teachers College Record, 98, 482-511.
58. Orfield, G., & Lee, C. (2004). Brown at 50: King's dream or Plessy's nightmare?. Cambridge, MA: The Civil Rights Project, Harvard University.
59. Pallas, A., Entwistle, D., Alexander, K., & Stluka, F. (1994). Ability group effects: Instructional, social, or institutional? Sociology of Education, 67, 27-46.
60. Radencich, M. C., & McKay, L. J. (1995). Flexible grouping for literacy in the elementary grades. Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
61. Rogers, K. (2004). The academic effects of acceleration. In N. Colangelo, S. Assouline, & M. Gross (Eds.), A nation deceived: How schools hold back America's brightest students (pp. 47-57). Iowa City, IA: The Belin Blank Center for Gifted Education and Talent Development.
62. Rosenbaum, J. (1976). Making inequality: The hidden curriculum of high school tracking. New York: Wiley.
63. Rosenthal, R., & Jacobson, L. (1968). Pygmalion in the classroom: Teacher Expectation and Pupil's Intellectual Development. New York: Holt, Rhinehart, and Winston.
64. Rowan, B., & Miracle, A. W. (1983). Systems of ability grouping and the stratification of achievement in elementary schools. Sociology of Education, 56, 133-144.
65. Rubin, B. (2006). Tracking and detracking: Debates, evidence, and best practices for a heterogeneous world. Theory Into Practice, 45, 4-14.
66. Rubin, B. C., & Noguera, P. A. (2004). Tracking and detracking: Sorting through the dilemmas and possibilities of detracking in practice. Equity and Excellence in Education, 37, 92-101.
67. Schafer, W. E., & Olexa, C. (1971). Tracking and opportunity. Scranton, PA: Chandler.
68. Schön, D. (1982). The reflective practitioner. New York: Basic Books.
69. The American Heritage Dictionary. (1982). The American Heritage Dictionary. Boston, MA: Houghton-Mifflin.
70. Watanabe, M. (2006). Some people think this school is tracked and some people don't: Using inquiry groups to unpack teachers' perspectives on detracking. Theory Into Practice, 45, 24-31.
71. Wells, A. S., & Oakes, J. (1996). Potential pitfalls of systemic reform: Early lessons from research on detracking. Sociology of Education, 69, 135-143.
72. Wells, A. S., & Serna, I. (1996). The politics of culture: Understanding local political resistance to detracking in racially mixed schools. Harvard Educational Review, 66, 93-118.
73. Welner, K., & Burris, C. C. (2006). Alternative approaches to the politics of detracking. Theory into Practice, 45, 90-99.
74. Wheelock, A. (1992). Crossing the tracks. New York: New World Press.
75. Wheelock, A. (1993). From tracking to untracking in the middle grades. Equity and Choice, 9, 44-50.
76. Worthy, J., Hungerford, H., & Hampton, A. (2009). Tracking and ability grouping. In L. Christenbury, R. Bomer, & P. Smagorinsky (Eds.), Handbook of research on adolescent literacy. New York: Guilford Press.
77. Yonezawa, S., & Jones, M. (2006). Students' perspectives on tracking and detracking. Theory Into Practice, 45, 15-23.