New Zealand Earthquake Forecast Testing Centre

Pure and Applied Geophysics

Volumn 167, Issue 8-9, 2010, Pages 877-892

  Gerstenberger, Matthew C ^a   Rhoades, David A ^a  

^a GNS SCIENCE   (New Zealand)

Author keywords

Earthquake forecasting; New Zealand; Statistical seismology

Indexed keywords

CALIFORNIA; COLLABORATIVE PROCESS; COLLABORATORIES; DATA COLLECTION; EARTHQUAKE FORECAST; EARTHQUAKE FORECASTING; NEW MODEL; NEW ZEALAND; NEW ZEALAND REGION; STATISTICAL SEISMOLOGY; TEST REGIONS; TESTING METHOD; TIME VARYING;

EARTHQUAKES; LIBRARIES; TESTING;

FORECASTING;

EARTHQUAKE CATALOGUE; EARTHQUAKE EPICENTER; EARTHQUAKE MAGNITUDE; EARTHQUAKE MECHANISM; EARTHQUAKE PREDICTION; EARTHQUAKE RECURRENCE;

NEW ZEALAND;

EID: 78049460802     PISSN: 00334553     EISSN: 14209136     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s00024-010-0082-4     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. Anderson, H., and Webb, T. (1994), New Zealand seismicity-Patterns revealed by the upgraded National-Seismograph-Network, N. Z. J. Geol. Geophys. 37, 477-493.
2. Console, R., and Murru, M. (2001), A simple and testable model for earthquake clustering. J. Geophys. Res. 106, 8699-8711.
3. Console, R., Murru, M., and Lombardi, A. M. (2003), Refining earthquake clustering models, J. Geophys. Res. 108, 2468, doi: 10. 1029/2002JB002130.
4. Console, R., Rhoades, D. A., Murru, M., Evison, F. F., Papadimitriou, E. E., and Karakostas, V. G. (2006), Comparative performance of time-invariant, long-range and short-range forecasting models on the earthquake catalogue of Greece, J. Geophys. Res. 111, B09304, doi: 10. 1029/2005JB004113.
5. Evison, F. F., and Rhoades, D. A. (2002), Precursory scale increase and long-term seismogenesis in California and Northern Mexico, Ann. Geophys. 45, 479-495.
6. Evison, F. F., and Rhoades, D. A. (2004), Demarcation and scaling of long-term seismogenesis, Pure Appl. Geophys. 161, 21-45.
7. Field, E. H. (2007), Overview of the Working Group for the Development of Regional Earthquake Likelihood Models (RELM), Seismol. Res. Lett. 78(1), 7-16.
8. Gerstenberger, M. (2003), Earthquake Clustering and Time-dependent Probabilisitic Seismic Hazard Analysis for California, Dissertation submitted to the Swiss Federal Institute of Technology for the degree of Doctor of Science, Zürich.
9. Gerstenberger, M., Wiemer, S., Jones, L. M., and Reasenberg, P. A. (2005), Real-time forecasts of tomorrow's earthquakes in California, Nature 435, 328-331.
10. Gutenberg, B., and Richter, C. F., (1944), Frequency of earthquakes in California, Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am. 34, 185-188.
11. Harte, D., Feng-Dong, L., Vreede, M., Vere-Jones, D., Wang, Q. (2007), Quantifying the M8 algorithm: model, forecast, and evaluation, New Zealand, J. Geol. Geophys. 50, 117-130.
12. Jackson, D. D., and Kagan, Y. Y. (1999), Testable Earthquake Forecasts for 1999, Seismol. Res. Lett. 70(4), 393-403.
13. Jordan, T. H. (2006), Earthquake predictability, brick by brick, Seismol. Res. Lett. 77(1), 3-6.
14. Keilis-Borok, V. I., and Kossobokov, V. G. (1990), Premonitory activation of earthquake flow: algorithm M8, Phys. Earth. Planet. Inter. 61, 73-83.
15. Ogata, Y. (1988), Statistical models for earthquake occurrences and residual analysis for point processes, J. Am. Stat. Assoc. 83, 9-27.
16. Ogata, Y. (1989), Statistical models for standard seismicity and detection of anomalies by residual analysis, Tectonophysics 169, 159-174.
17. Ogata, Y. (1998), Space-time point process models for earthquake occurrence, Ann. Inst. Stat. Math. 50, 379-402.
18. Reasenberg, P. A. (1985), Second-order moment of central California seismicity, 1969-1982, J. Geophys. Res. 90, 5479-5496.
19. Reasenberg, P. A., and Jones, L. M. (1989), Earthquake hazard after a mainshock in California, Science 243, 1173-1176.
20. Rhoades, D. A. (2007), Application of the EEPAS model to forecasting earthquakes of moderate magnitude in Southern California, Seismol. Res. Lett. 78(1), 110-115.
21. Rhoades, D. A., and Evison, F. F. (2004), Long-range earthquake forecasting with every earthquake a precursor according to scale, Pure Appl. Geophys. 161, 47-71.
22. Rhoades, D. A., and Evison, F. F. (2005), Test of the EEPAS forecasting model on the Japan earthquake catalogue, Pure Appl Geophys. 162, 1271-1290.
23. Rhoades, D. A., and Evison, F. F. (2006), The EEPAS forecasting model and the probability of moderate-to-large earthquakes in the Kanto region, Central Japan, Tectonophysics 417, 119-130.
24. Rhoades, D., and Gerstenberger, M. (2009), Mixture models for improved short-term earthquake forecasting, Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am. 99, 636-646, doi: 10. 1785/0120080063.
25. Robinson, R., and Benites, R. (1996), Synthetic Seismicity Models for the Wellington Region, New Zealand: Implications for the Temporal Distribution of Large Events, J. Geophys. Res. 101, 27833-27845.
26. Schorlemmer, D., and Gerstenberger, M. C. (2007), RELM Testing Center, Seismol. Res. Lett. 78(1), 30-36.
27. Schorlemmer, D., Gerstenberger, M. C, Wiemer, S., Jackson, D. D., and Rhoades, D. A. (2007), Earthquake likelihood model testing, Seismol. Res. Lett. 78(1), 17-29.
28. Stern, T. A., Stratford, W. R., and Salmon, M. L. (2006), Subduction evolution and mantle dynamics at a continental margin: Central North Island, New Zealand, Rev. Geophys. 44, RG4002, doi: 10. 1029/2005RG000171.
29. Stirling, M. W., McVerry, G. H., and Berryman, K. R. (2002), A new seismic hazard model for New Zealand, Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am. 92, 1878-1903.
30. Wessel, P., and Smith, W. H. F. (1995), New version of the generic mapping tools released, EOS Trans. Am. Geophys. U. 76, 329.