Overview of the working group for the development of Regional Earthquake Likelihood Models (RELM)

Seismological Research Letters

Volumn 78, Issue 1, 2007, Pages 7-16

  Field, Edward H ^a  

^a U S GEOLOGICAL SURVEY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 34248673702     PISSN: 08950695     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1785/gssrl.78.1.7     Document Type: Review

References (51)

1. Bird, P., and Y. Y. Kagan (2004). Plate-tectonic analysis of shallow seismicity: Apparent boundary width, beta, corner magnitude, coupled lithosphere thickness, and coupling in seven tectonic settings. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America 94, 2,380-2,399, plus electronic supplement.
2. Bird, P., and Z. Liu (2007). Seismic hazard inferred from tectonics: California. Seismological Research Letters 78 (1), 37-48.
3. Bowman, D. D., and G. C. P King (2001). Accelerating seismicity and stress accumulation before large earthquakes. Geophysical Research Letters 28, 4,039-4,042.
4. Burnham, K. P., and D. R. Anderson (2002). Model Selection and Multimodel Inference: A Practical Information-Theoretic Approach. New York: Springer.
5. Console, R., and M. Murru (2001). A simple and testable model for earthquake clustering. Journal of Geophysical Research 106, 8,699-8,711.
6. Console, R., M. Murru, and F. Catalli (2006). Physical and stochastic models of earthquake clustering. Tectonophysics 417, 141-153.
7. Console, R., M. Murru, F. Catalli, and G. Falcone (2007). Real time forecasts through an earthquake clustering model constrained by the rate-and-state constitutive law: Comparison with a purely stochastic ETAS model. Seismological Research Letters 78 (1), 49-56.
8. Dieterich, J. H. (1994). A constitutive law for rate of earthquake production and its application to earthquake clustering. Journal of Geophysical Research 99, 2,601-2,618.
9. Ebel, J., D. W. Chambers, A. L. Kafka, and J. A. Baglivo (2007). Non-Poissonian earthquake clustering and the hidden Markov model as bases for earthquake forecasting in California. Seismological Research Letters 78 (1), 57-65.
10. Evison, F. F., and D. A. Rhoades (2004). Demarcation and scaling of long-term seismogenesis. Pure and Applied Geophysics 161, 21-45.
11. Field, E. H., T. H. Jordan, and C. A. Cornell (2003). OpenSHA: A developing community-modeling environment for seismic hazard analysis. Seismological Research Letters 74, 406-419.
12. Frankel, A. D., M. D. Petersen, C. S. Mueller, K. M. Haller, R. L. Wheeler, E. V. Leyendecker, R. L. Wesson, S. C. Harmsen, C. H. Cramer, D. M. Perkins, and K. S. Rukstales (2002). Documentation for the 2002 Update of the National Seismic Hazard Maps. USGS Open-File Report 02-420.
13. Gardner, J. K., and L. Knopoff (1974). Is the sequence of earthquakes in southern California with aftershocks removed Poissonian? Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America 64, 1,363-1,367.
14. Gerstenberger, M., S. Wiemer, L. M. Jones, and P. A. Reasenberg (2005). Real-time forecast of tomorrow's earthquakes in California. Nature 435, 328-331.
15. Gerstenberger, M. C., L. M. Jones, and S. Wiemer (2007). Short-term Aftershock Probabilities: Case Studies in California 78 (1), 66-77.
16. Gutenberg, B., and C. F. Richter (1944). Frequency of Earthquakes in California, Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America 34, 137-160.
17. Helmstetter, A., Y. Y. Kagan, and D. D. Jackson (2007). High-resolution Time-independent Grid-based Forecast for m ≥ 5 Earthquakes in California. Seismological Research Letters 78 (1), 78-86.
18. Holliday, J. R., C. Chen, K. F. Tiampo, J. B. Rundle, D. L. Turcotte, and A. Donnellan. (2007). A RELM Earthquake Forecast Based on Pattern Informatics. Seismological Research Letters 78 (1), 87-93.
19. Jackson, D. D. (1996). The case for huge earthquakes. Seismological Research Letters 67, 3-5.
20. Jackson, D. D., and Y. Y. Kagan (2006). The 2004 Parkfield earthquake, the 1985 prediction, and characteristic earthquakes: Lessons for the future. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America 96, S397-S409.
21. Joliffe, I. T., and D. B. Stephenson (2003). Forecast Verification - A Practitioner's Guide in Atmospheric Science. Chichester, England, and Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons.
22. Jordan, T. H. (2006). Earthquake predictability, brick by brick. Seismological Research Letters 77, 3-6.
23. Kagan, Y. Y., and D. D. Jackson (1994). Long-term probabilistic forecasting of earthquakes, Journal of Geophysical Research 99, 13,685-13,700.
24. Kagan, Y. Y., and D. D. Jackson (1995). New seismic gap hypothesis: Five years after. Journal of Geophysical Research 100, 3,943-3,959.
25. Kagan, Y. Y., D. D. Jackson, Y. Rong (2007). A Testable Five-year Forecast of Moderate and Large Earthquakes in Southern California based on Smoothed Seismicity. Seismological Research Letters 78 (1), 94-98.
26. Kostrov, B. V. (1974). Seismic moment and energy of earthquakes, and seismic flow of rock. Izvestiya Academy of Sciences of the USSR (Physics of Solid Earth) 1, 23-40.
27. Ogata, Y. (1983). Estimation of the parameters in the modified Omori formula for aftershock frequencies by the maximum likelihood procedure. Journal of Physics of the Earth 31, 115-124.
28. Ogata, Y. (1998). Space-time point-process models for earthquake occurrences. Annals of the Institute of Statistical Mathematics 50, 379-402.
29. Molchan, G. M. (1997). Earthquake predictions as a decision-making problem. Pure and Applied Geophysics 149, 233-247.
30. Petersen, M. D., T. Cao, K. W. Campbell, and A. D. Frankel (2007). Time-independent and Time-dependent Seismic Hazard Assessment for the State of California: Uniform California Earthquake Rupture Forecast Model 1.0. Seismological Research Letters 78 (1), 99-109.
31. Reasenberg, P. A., and L. M. Jones (1989). Earthquake hazard after a mainshock in California. Science 243, 1,173-1,176.
32. Reasenberg, P. A., and L. M. Jones (1990). California aftershock hazard forecast. Science 247, 345-346.
33. Reasenberg, P. A., and L. M. Jones (1994). Earthquake aftershocks: Update. Science 265, 1,251-1,252.
34. Rhoades, D. A. (2007). Application of the EEPAS Model to Forecasting Earthquakes of Moderate Magnitude in Southern California. Seismological Research Letters 78 (1), 110-115.
35. Rundle, J. B. (1988). A physical model for earthquakes, 2, Application to southern California. Journal of Geophysical Research 93, 6,255-6,274.
36. Rundle, J. B., P. B. Rundle, A. Donnellan, and G. C. Fox (2004). Gutenberg-Richter statistics in topologically realistic system-level earthquake stress-evolution simulations. Earth, Planets and Space 56, 761-771.
37. Schorlemmer, D., M. C. Gerstenberger, S. Wiemer, D. D. Jackson, and D. A. Rhoades (2007) Earthquake Likelihood Model Testing. Seismological Research Letters 78 (1), 17-29.
38. Schorlemmer, D., and M. C. Gerstenberger (2007). RELM Testing Center. Seismological Research Letters 78 (1), 30-36.
39. Schwartz, D. P., and K. J. Coppersmith (1984). Fault behavior and characteristic earthquakes: Examples from the Wasatch and San Andreas fault zones. Journal of Geophysical Research 89, 5,681-5,698.
40. Schwartz, D. P. (1996). Opinion letter. Seismological Research Letters 67, 5-6.
41. Shen, Z.-K., D. D. Jackson, and Y. Y. Kagan (2007). Implications of geodetic strain rate for future earthquakes, with a five-year forecast of M5 earthquakes in southern California. Seismological Research Letters 78 (1), 116-120.
42. SSHAC, Senior Seismic Hazard Analysis Committee (1997). Recommendations for Probabilistic Seismic Hazard Analysis: Guidance on Uncertainty and Use of Experts. U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, U.S. Dept. of Energy, Electric Power Research Institute; NUREG/CR-6372, UCRL-ID-122160, Vol. 1-2. Also a review of the document by National Academy Press, Washington, DC, 73 pp.
43. Steacy, S., J. Gomberg, and M. Cocco (2005). Introduction to special section: Stress transfer, earthquake triggering, and time-dependent seismic hazard. Journal of Geophysical Research 110, B05SO1, doi:10.1029/2005JB003692.
44. Stein, R. S., A. A. Barka, and J. H. Dieterich (1997). Progressive failure on the North Anatolian fault since 1939 by earthquake stress triggering. Geophysical Journal International 128, 594-604.
45. Toda, S., R. S. Stein, K. Richards-Dinger, and S. Bozkurt (2005). Forecasting the evolution of seismicity in southern California: Animations built on earthquake stress transfer. Journal of Geophysical Research 110, B05S16, doi:10.1029/2004JB003415.
46. Ward, S. N. (1997). Dogtails versus rainbows: Synthetic earthquake rupture models as an aid in interpreting geological data. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America 87, 1,422-1,441.
47. Ward, S. N. (2000). San Francisco Bay area earthquake simulations: A step toward a standard physical earthquake model. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America 90, 370-386.
48. Ward, S. N. (2007). Methods for evaluating earthquake potential and likelihood in and around California. Seismological Research Letters 78 (1), 121-133.
49. Wiemer, S., and D. Schorlemmer (2007). ALM: An asperity-based likelihood model for California. Seismological Research Letters 78 (1), 134-140.
50. WGCEP, Working Group on California Earthquake Probabilities [Jackson, D. D.; Aki, K.; Cornell, C. A.; Dieterich, J, H.; Henyey, T. L.; Mahdyiar, M.; Schwartz, D.; Ward, S. N.] (1995). Seismic hazards in southern California: Probable earthquakes, 1994-2024. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America 85, 379-439.
51. WGCEP, Working Group on California Earthquake Probabilities (2003). Earthquake Probabilities in the San Francisco Bay Region: 2002-2031. USGS Open-File Report 03-214.