Can a single, short continuing professional development workshop cause change in the classroom?

Professional Development in Education

Volumn 35, Issue 1, 2009, Pages 63-82

  Lydon, Susannah ^a   King, Chris ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NOTTINGHAM   (United Kingdom)

^b KEELE UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 78049431075     PISSN: 19415257     EISSN: 19415265     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/13674580802264746     Document Type: Review

References (23)

1. Adey, P. 2004. The professional development of teachers: practice and theory, Boston, MA: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
2. Bolam, R. and McMahon, A. 2004. "Literature, definition and models: towards a conceptual map". In International handbook on the continuing professional development of teachers, Edited by: Day, C. and Sachs, J. 229-237. Maidenhead: Open University Press.
3. Cordingley, P., Bell, M., Rundell, B. and Evans, D. 2003. "The impact of collaborative CPD on classroom teaching and learning". In Research evidence in education library version 1.1, London: EPPI Centre, Social Science Research Unit, Institute of Education, University of London.
4. Cordingley, P., Bell, M., Thomason, S. and Firth, A. 2005a. "The impact of collaborative continuing professional development (CPD) on classroom teaching and learning. Review: how do collaborative and sustained CPD and sustained but not collaborative CPD affect teaching and learning?". In Research evidence in education library, London: EPPI Centre, Social Science Research Unit, Institute of Education, University of London.
5. Cordingley, P., Bell, M., Evans, D. and Firth, A. 2005b. "The impact of collaborative CPD on classroom teaching and learning. Review: what do teacher impact data tell us about collaborative CPD?". In Research evidence in education library, London: EPPI Centre, Social Science Research Unit, Institute of Education, University of London.
6. Day, C. 1999. Developing teachers: the challenges of Lifelong Learning, London: RoutledgeFalmer.
7. Guskey, T. 2000. Evaluating professional development, Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.
8. Harland, J. and Kinder, K. 1997. Teachers' continuing professional development: framing a model of outcomes. British Journal of In-service Education, 23: 71-84.
9. Hansen, K. and Hlawatsch, H. Enactment of earth system education through curriculum material and in-service workshops. Geoscience education: understanding system Earth. GeoSciEd V Conference Abstracts. pp.102Hannover: Deutsche Gesellschaft für Geowissenschaften.
10. Joyce, B. and Showers, B. 1988. Student achievement through staff development, New York: Longman.
11. Kelchtermans, G. 2004. "CPD for professional renewal: moving beyond knowledge for practice". In International handbook on the continuing professional development of teachers, Edited by: Day, C. and Sachs, J. 229-237. Maidenhead: Open University Press.
12. King, C. 2000. The Earth's mantle is solid: teachers' misconceptions about the Earth and plate tectonics. School Science Review, 82(298): 57-64.
13. King, C. 2001. The response of teachers to new content in a National Science Curriculum: the case of the earth-science component. Science Education, 85: 636-664.
14. King, C., Fleming, A., Kennett, P. and Thompson, D. 2002. A report on the earth science content of commonly used secondary science textbooks, 101Keele: The Earth Science Education Unit, Keele University.
15. King, C., Fleming, A., Kennett, P. and Thompson, D. 2005. How effectively do science textbooks teach earth science?. School Science Review, 87(318): 95-104.
16. Muijs, D., Day, C., Harris, A. and Lindsay, G. 2004. "Evaluating CPD: an overview". In International handbook on the continuing professional development of teachers, Edited by: Day, C. and Sachs, J. 229-237. Maidenhead: Open University Press.
17. Office for Standards in Education. 2004. Secondary schools at a glance 2002/03 Available online at: http://www.ofsted.gov.uk/assets/3678.pdf (accessed March 2008)
18. Rebelo, D., Marques, L., Marques, E. and Morgado, M. Teacher training experience towards the improvement of teachers' preparation to develop curricular outdoor activities: a Portuguese perspective. Earth science for the global community. GeoSciEd IV Conference Abstracts. pp.196-197. Calgary: GeoSciEd IV Organising Committee.
19. Rebelo, D., Marques, L., Marques, E. and Morgado, M. Perspectives of Portuguese students and teachers about fieldwork and curriculum materials designed. Earth science for the global community. GeoSciEd IV Conference Abstracts. pp.193-195. Calgary: GeoSciEd IV Organising Committee.
20. Robinson, C. and Sebba, J. 2004. A review of research and evaluation to inform the development of the new postgraduate professional development programme, TTA/University of Sussex Available online at: http://www.tda.gov.uk/ (accessed March 2008)
21. Steadman, S., Eraut, M., Fielding, M. and Horton, A. 1995. Making school-based INSET effective, Brighton: University of Sussex Institute of Education. Research Report No. 2
22. Templin, M. A. and Bombaugh, R. 2005. An innovation in the evaluation of teacher professional development serving reform in science. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 16: 141-158.
23. Wilson, S. M. and Berne, J. 1999. Teacher learning and the acquisition of professional knowledge: an examination of research on contemporary professional development. Review of Research in Education, 24: 173-209.