An innovation in the evaluation of teacher professional development serving reform in science

Journal of Science Teacher Education

Volumn 16, Issue 2, 2005, Pages 141-158

  Templin, Mark A ^a   Bombaugh, Ruth ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TOLEDO   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF NEW MEXICO   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 22544475628     PISSN: 1046560X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s10972-005-2654-1     Document Type: Article

References (19)

1. American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS). (1993). Project 2061: Benchmarks for science literacy. New York: Oxford University Press.
2. Anderson, K., & Mitchener, C. P. (1994). Research on science teacher education. In D. L. Gabel (Ed.), Handbook of research on science teaching and learning (pp. 3-44). New York: Macmillan.
3. Avard, M. M., & Clark, B. K. (2001). Globe in preservice and inservice teacher education. Journal of Geosciences Education, 49, 461-466.
4. Ball, D. L., & Cohen, D. K. (1999). Developing practice, developing practitioners. In L. Darling-Hammond & G. Sykes (Eds.), Teaching as the learning profession. Handbook of policy and practice (pp. 3-32). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
5. Beyer, L. E., & Apple, M. W. (1988). Values and politics in the curriculum. In L. E. Beyer & M. W. Apple (Eds.), The curriculum: Problems, politics, and possibilities (pp. 3-16). Albany: State University of New York Press.
6. Cohen, D. K., & Ball, D. L. (1990). Policy and practice: An overview. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 12, 233-239.
7. Global Learning and Observations to Benefit the Environment (GLOBE). (1997). Partnership manual. Washington DC: Author.
8. Guskey, T. R. (1986). Staff development and the process of teacher change. Educational Researcher, 15(5), 5-12.
9. Marton, F. (1988). Phenomenography: Exploring different conceptions of reality. In D. M. Fetterman (Ed.), Qualitative approaches to evaluation in education: The silent revolution (pp. 176-201). New York: Praeger.
10. Millar, R., & Osborne, J. (Eds.). (1998). Beyond 2000: Science education for the future. London: King's College.
11. National Research Council. (1996). National science education standards. Washington DC: Author.
12. Norris, N. (1984). Understanding educational evaluation. New York: St. Martin's Press.
13. Schmidt, W. H., McKnight, C. C., & Raizen, S. (Eds.). (1997). A splintered vision: An investigation of U.S. science and mathematics education. Dordrecht/Boston/London: Kluwer.
14. Schwab, J. J. (1964). The structure of the natural sciences. In G. W. Ford & L. Pugno (Eds.), The structure of knowledge and the curriculum (pp. 31-49). Chicago: Rand-McNally.
15. Smylie, M. A. (1989). Teachers' views of the effectiveness of sources of learning to teacher. The Elementary School Journal, 89, 543-558.
16. Supovitz, J. A., & Turner, H. M. (2000). The effects of professional development on science teaching practices and classroom culture. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 37, 963-980.
17. Van Driel, J. H., Beijaard, D., & Verloop, N. (2001). Professional development and reform in science education: The role of teachers' practical knowledge. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 38, 137-158.
18. Werner, W. (1978). Evaluation: Sense-making in school programs. In T. Aoki (Ed.), Curriculum evaluation in a new key. Monograph Series No. 1. Vancouver: University of British Columbia, Center for the Study of Curriculum and Instruction, Faculty of Education. (ED 153 907)
19. Wilson, B. L., & Corbett, H. D. (1990). Statewide testing and local improvements: An oxymoron? In J. Murphy (Ed.), The educational reform movement of the 1980s (pp. 243-263). Berkeley, CA: McCutchan.