'Give me a chance!' An experiment in social decision under risk

Experimental Economics

Volumn 13, Issue 4, 2010, Pages 500-511

  Krawczyk, Michal ^a   Le Lec, Fabrice ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WARSAW   (Poland)

^b UNIVERSITÉ CATHOLIQUE DE LILLE   (France)

Author keywords

Inequity aversion; Other regarding preferences; Procedural fairness; Social concern; Social preferences; Social preferences under risk

Indexed keywords

EID: 78049417721     PISSN: 13864157     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s10683-010-9253-5     Document Type: Article

References (17)

1. Andersen, S., Harrsion, G., Lau, M., & Rutstrom, E. (2006). Elicitation using multiple price list formats. Experimental Economics, 9, 383-405.
2. Andreoni, J., & Miller, J. (2002). Giving according to GARP: an experimental test of the consistency of preferences for altruism. Econometrica, 70, 737-754.
3. Bolton, G. E., & Ockenfels, A. (2000). ERC: a theory of equity, reciprocity and competition. American Economic Review, 90, 166-193.
4. Bolton, G. E., Brandts, J., & Ockenfels, A. (2005). Fair procedures: evidence from games involving lotteries. Economic Journal, 115, 1054-1076.
5. Brennan, G., Güth, W., Gonzalez, L., & Levati, M. V. (2008). Attitudes toward private and collective risks in individual and strategic choice situations. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization.
6. Charness, G., & Rabin, M. (2002). Understanding social preferences with simple tests. Quartely Journal of Economics, 117, 817-869.
7. Dana, J., Weber, R., & Kuang, J. (2007). Exploiting moral wriggle room: experiments demonstrating an illusory preference for fairness. Economic Theory, 33, 67-80.
8. Engelmann, D., & Strobel, M. (2004). Inequality aversion, efficiency, and maximin preferences in simple distribution experiments. American Economic Review, 94, 857-869.
9. Fehr, E., & Schmidt, K. M. (1999). A theory of fairness, competition, and cooperation. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 114, 817-868.
10. Fischbacher, U. (2007). z-Tree: Zurich toolbox for ready-made economic experiments. Experimental Economics, 10, 171-178.
11. Gächter, S., & Riedl, A. (2005). Moral property rights in bargaining with infeasible claims. Management Science, 51, 249-263.
12. Güth, W., Levati, V., & Ploner, M. (2008). On the social dimension of time and risk preferences: an experimental study. Economic Inquiry, 46, 261-272.
13. Karni, E., Salmon, T., & Sopher, B. (2008). Individual sense of fairness: an experimental study. Experimental Economics, 11, 174-179.
14. Koch, A. K., & Normann, H.-T. (2008). Giving in dictator games: regard for others or regard by others? Southern Economic Journal, 75, 223-231.
15. Monin, B., & Miller, D. (2001). Moral credentials and the expression of prejudice. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 81, 33-43.
16. Murnighan, J. K., Oeschb, J. M., & Pillutlac, M. (2001). Player types and self-impression management in dictatorship games: two experiments. Games and Economic Behavior, 37, 388-414.
17. Trautmann, S. (2009). A tractable model of process fairness under risk. Journal of Economic Psychology, 30, 803-813.