Genres of participation in social networking systems: A study of the 2009 Norwegian parliamentary election

Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics)

Volumn 6229 LNCS, Issue , 2010, Pages 104-114

  Johannessen, Marius ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF AGDER   (Norway)

Author keywords

Election campaign; EParticipation; Genre Repertoire; Genre theory; Social Networking Systems

Indexed keywords

E-PARTICIPATION; ELECTION CAMPAIGN; GENRE REPERTOIRES; GENRE THEORY; SOCIAL NETWORKING; SOCIAL NETWORKING SYSTEMS;

ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE; COMPUTERS;

SOCIAL NETWORKING (ONLINE);

EID: 78049343433     PISSN: 03029743     EISSN: 16113349     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-15158-3_9     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (34)

1. Hestvik, H.: Valgkamp2001.no. Partier, velgere og nye medier. Ny kommunikasjon? In: Aardal, B., Krogstad, A., Narud, H. M. (eds.) I valgkampens hete: strategisk kommunikasjon og politisk usikkerhet. Universitetsforlaget, Oslo (2001)
2. Edelman, The Social pulpit. Barack Obama's social media Toolkit (2009)
3. Østerud, Ø., Engelstad, F., Selle, P.: Makten og demokratiet: en sluttbok fra Makt-og demokratiutredningen. Gyldendal akademisk, Oslos (2003)
4. Sæbø, Ø., Rose, J., Skiftenes Flak, L.: The shape of eParticipation: Characterizing an emerging research area. Government Information Quarterly 25(3), 400-428 (2008)
5. Tambouris, E., Liotas, N., Tarabanis, K.: A Framework for Assessing eParticipation Projects and Tools. In: Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, Hawaii (2007)
6. Brandtzæg, P. B., Lüders, M.: eCitizen 2.0: The Ordinary Citizen as a Supplier of Public Sector Information. Ministry for Government and Administration Reform, Oslo (2008)
7. Dahlberg, L.: The Internet and Democratic Discourse: Exploring The Prospects of Online Deliberative Forums Extending the Public Sphere. Information, Communication & Society 4(4), 615-633 (2001)
8. Sæbø, Ø., Päivârinta, T.: Autopoietic cybergenres for e-Democracy? Genre analysis of a web-based discussion board. In: Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (2005)
9. Komito, L.: e-Participation and Governance: Widening the net. The Electronic Journal of e-Government 3(1), 39-48 (2005)
10. Sanford, C., Rose, J.: Characterizing eParticipation. International Journal of Information Management 27(6), 406-421 (2007)
11. Ekelin, A.: To be or not to be active: Exploring practices of e-participation. Springer, Berlin (2006)
12. Rose, J., Sæbø, Ø.: Democracy Squared: Designing On-Line Political Communities to Accommodate Conflicting Interests Scandinavian. Journal of Information Systems 17(2) (2005)
13. Päivärinta, T., Sæbø, Ø.: Models of E-democracy. Communications of the Association for Information Systems 17(4) (2006)
14. Bughin, J., Manyika, J., Miller, A.: McKinsey global survey results: Building the web 2.0 enterprise. In: McKinsey Quarterly survey on web 2.0 (July 2008)
15. Tapscott, D., Williams, A.: Wikinomics: How mass collaboration changes everything., 2nd edn. Portfolio/Penguin Group, New York (2008)
16. O'Reilly, T.: What is web 2.0? Design patterns and business models for the next generation of software (2005), http://oreilly.com/web2/archive/what-is- web-20.html (cited September 2, 2010)
17. User centric media: Future and challenges in european Research, European Commission: Information society and media (2007)
18. Enders, A., et al.: The long tail of social networking. Revenue models of social networking sites. European Management Journal 26(3) (2008)
19. OECD, Participative web and User-created Content: Web 2.0, wikis and social networking, OECD (2007)
20. Boyd, d.m., Ellison, N. B.: Social Network Sites: Definition, History, and Scholarship. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication 13(1), 210-230 (2008)
21. Anderson, P.: What is Web 2.0? Ideas, technologies and implications for education. In: JISC Technology and Standards Watch (2007)
22. Rose, J., et al.: The role of social networking software in eParticipation, in DEMO-net: D14.3. In: Svendsen, S. B. (ed.) DEMO-net: The Democracy Network (2007)
23. Aardal, B., Krogstad, A., Narud, H. M.: I valgkampens hete: strategisk kommunikasjon og politisk usikkerhet, p. 431. Universitetsforl, Oslo (2004)
24. Aardal, B., Holth, I. J.: Norske velgere: en studie av stortingsvalget 2005, p. 381. Damm, Oslo (2007)
25. Fredriksen, A., Alnes, E.: Valgseier med hjelp av Internett, NRK (2009)
26. Karlsen, R.: Den første internettvalgkampen? Velgernes informasjonskilder. In: Aardal, B., Holth, I. J. (eds.) Norske velgere: en studie av stortingsvalget 2005. Damm, Oslo (2007)
27. Kalnes, Ø.: Norwegian Parties and Web 2.0. Journal of Information Technology and Politics 6(3), 251-266 (2009)
28. Andresen, S.: Valgkamp på nett: partilederes bruk av blogg som politisk kommunikasjonsverktøy i valget 2007. S. Andresen, Oslo (2008)
29. Yates, J., Orlikowski, W. J.: Genres of Organizational Communication: A Structurational Approach to Studying Communication and Media. The Academy of Management Review 17(2), 299-326 (1992)
30. Orlikowski, W. J., Yates, J.: Genre Repertoire: The Structuring of Communicative Practices in Organizations. Administrative Science Quarterly 39(4), 541-574 (1994)
31. Shepherd, M., Watters, C.: The evolution of cybergenres. In: Proceedings of the Thirty-First Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (1998)
32. Päivärinta, T., Halttunen, V., Tyrväinen, P.: A Genre-Based Method for Information Systems Planning. In: Rossi, M., Siau, K. (eds.) Information Modeling in the New Millenium, pp. 70-93. Idea Group Publishing, Hershey (2001)
33. Yoshioka, T., et al.: Genre taxonomy: A knowledge repository of communicative actions. ACM Trans. Inf. Syst. 19(4), 431-456 (2001)
34. Jackson, N. A., Lilleker, D. G.: Building an Architecture of Participation? Political Parties and Web 2.0 in Britain. Journal of Information Technology and Politics 6(3), 232-250 (2009)