Evoked potential and behavioral outcomes for experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis in Lewis rats

Neurological Sciences

Volumn 31, Issue 5, 2010, Pages 595-601

  All, Angelo H ^a   Agrawal, Gracee ^a   Walczak, Piotr ^a   Maybhate, Anil ^a   Bulte, Jeff W M ^a   Kerr, Douglas A ^a,b  

^a JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^b JOHNS HOPKINS BLOOMBERG SCHOOL OF PUBLIC HEALTH   (United States)

Author keywords

BBB score; Cytokine ethidium bromide; Focal experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis (EAE); MOG IFA immunization; Rat model; Somatosensory evoked potential

Indexed keywords

ALLERGIC ENCEPHALOMYELITIS; ANIMAL BEHAVIOR; ANIMAL EXPERIMENT; ANIMAL MODEL; ANIMAL TISSUE; ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; EVOKED SOMATOSENSORY RESPONSE; FEMALE; INJURY SEVERITY; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; LEWIS RAT; MOTOR PERFORMANCE; NEUROPHYSIOLOGY; NONHUMAN; RAT; RELIABILITY; SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS; SENSORY EVALUATION;

ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; ANIMALS; BEHAVIOR, ANIMAL; DISEASE MODELS, ANIMAL; ELECTRIC STIMULATION; ENCEPHALOMYELITIS, AUTOIMMUNE, EXPERIMENTAL; EVOKED POTENTIALS, SOMATOSENSORY; EXTREMITIES; FEMALE; MOVEMENT; MYELIN-ASSOCIATED GLYCOPROTEIN; RATS; RATS, INBRED LEW; REACTION TIME; SEVERITY OF ILLNESS INDEX; SPINAL CORD; TIME FACTORS;

EID: 78049333531     PISSN: 15901874     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s10072-010-0329-y     Document Type: Article

References (19)

1. National Multiple Sclerosis Society, http://www.nationalmssociety.org/ index.aspx
2. CM Poser DW Paty L Scheinberg WI McDonald FA Davis GC Ebers KP Johnson WA Sibley DH Silberberg WW Tourtellotte 2004 New diagnostic criteria for multiple sclerosis: guidelines for research protocols Ann Neurol 13 227 231 10.1002/ana.410130302
3. CH Polman SC Reingold G Edan M Filippi HP Hartung L Kappos FD Lublin LM Metz HF McFarland PW O'Connor MS Wollheim AJ Thompson BG Weinshenker JS Wolinsky 2005 Diagnostic criteria for multiple sclerosis: 2005 revisions to the "McDonald Criteria" Ann Neurol 58 840 846 10.1002/ana.20703 16283615 (Pubitemid 41746873)
4. BA Hart S Amor M Jonker 2004 Evaluating the validity of animal models for research into therapies for immune-based disorders Drug Discov Today 9 517 524 10.1016/S1359-6446(04)03030-2 15183159 (Pubitemid 38479682)
5. M Kerschensteiner C Stadelmann BS Buddeberg D Merkler FM Bareyre DC Anthony C Linington W Bruck ME Schwab 2004 Targeting experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis lesions to a predetermined axonal tract system allows for refined behavioral testing in an animal model of multiple sclerosis Am J Pathol 164 1455 1469 15039233
6. CA DeBoy J Zhang S Dike I Shats M Jones DS Reich S Mori T Nguyen B Rothstein RH Miller JT Griffin DA Kerr PA Calabresi 2007 High resolution diffusion tensor imaging of axonal damage in focal inflammatory and demyelinating lesions in rat spinal cord Brain 130 2199 2210 10.1093/brain/awm122 17557778 (Pubitemid 47236617)
7. D Basso M Beattie J Bresnahan 1995 A sensitive and reliable locomotor rating scale for open field testing in rats J Neurotrauma 12 1 21 1:STN:280:DyaK2Mzgt1GhtQ%3D%3D 10.1089/neu.1995.12.1 7783230
8. D Basso M Beattie J Bresnahan 1996 Graded histological and locomotor outcomes after spinal cord contusion using the NYU weight-drop device versus transaction Exp Neurol 139 244 256 1:STN:280:DyaK283jt1eiuw%3D%3D 10.1006/exnr.1996.0098 8654527 (Pubitemid 26228093)
9. W Young 1996 Secondary injury mechanisms in acute spinal cord injury J Emerg Med 11 13 22
10. NB Finnerup C Gyldensted A Fuglsang-Frederiksen FW Bach TS Jensen 2004 Sensory perception in complete spinal cord injury Acta Neurol Scand 109 194 199 1:STN:280:DC%2BD2c%2Fmt1ylsg%3D%3D 10.1034/j.1600-0404.2003.00219.x 14763957 (Pubitemid 38270875)
11. G Agrawal NV Thakor AH All 2009 Evoked potential versus behavior to detect minor insult to spinal cord in rat model J Clin Neurosci 16 8 1052 1055 10.1016/j.jocn.2008.08.009 19419872
12. GD Dawson 1947 Cerebral response to electrical stimulation of peripheral nerve in man J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 10 137 140
13. Grundy BL (1984) Intraoperative monitoring of sensory evoked potentials. In: Nodar RH, Barber C (eds) Evoked Potentials II. Butterworth, Boston, p 624
14. Chiappa K (1990) Evoked potentials in clinical medicine, 2nd edn. Raven Press, New York
15. MR Nuwer 1998 Spinal cord monitoring with somatosensory techniques J Clin Neurophysiol 15 183 193 1:STN:280:DyaK1czksVyrsw%3D%3D 10.1097/00004691- 199805000-00002 9681556 (Pubitemid 28376419)
16. MR Nuwer 1998 Fundamentals of evoked potentials and common clinical applications today Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 106 142 148 1:STN:280:DyaK1cvht1yjtA%3D%3D 10.1016/S0013-4694(97)00117-X 9741775 (Pubitemid 28133394)
17. Sherman DL, Atit MK, Geocadin RG, Venkatesha S, Hanley DF, Natarajan AL, Thakor NV (2002) Diagnostic instrumentation for neurological injury. IEEE Instru Measur Mag 28-35
18. RH Brown CL Nash JA Berilla MD Amaddio 1984 Cortical evoked potential monitoring: a system for intraoperative monitoring of spinal cord function Spine 9 256 261 1:STN:280:DyaL2c3isVamuw%3D%3D 10.1097/00007632-198404000-00006 6729590
19. DH York RJ Chabot RW Gaines 1987 Response variability of somatosensory evoked potentials during scoliosis surgery Spine 12 864 876 1:STN:280: DyaL1c7lvFersw%3D%3D 10.1097/00007632-198711000-00007 3441833